Steinsaltz on Genesis
Steinsaltz on Genesis somebodySteinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 01
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 01 somebodyIn the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. The opening verse takes the existence of God as a given. It does not address questions about God’s origin or nature; rather, God is understood to be the absolute existence from which everything begins. Already at the beginning of the account of Creation, heaven and earth appear as distinct entities and as a framework for all of creation, as detailed in the rest of the chapter.
The earth was unformed and empty [ tohu vavohu ]. The earth was completely lacking any structure or order. The heavens too were unformed and empty, but the verse initially focuses on the earth, its structure and content. Although these two terms appear together in other places in the Bible, the precise meaning of the word vohu is difficult to ascertain; it is even uncertain whether vohu refers to a distinct concept. And darkness was upon the face of the deep. The deep may refer to deep waters, or to the unstructured universe, that existed at the time. At this early stage of Creation, nothing had yet to receive definite shape; nothing had been revealed. Therefore, the darkness upon the face of the deep was merely the absence of the light that was about to be created. Some commentaries maintain that the darkness was not the absence of light, but an entity in itself, based on the verse “I form the light, and create darkness.” And the spirit of God hovered over the surface of the water. Water is the first actual substance mentioned in the Torah, as the heaven and the earth are not substances but general entities or zones. The verse does not discuss the creation of the primeval substance that served as the foundation for all of existence. In any case, the Torah indicates that God’s power, or will, exists in some form in this reality. God is not located within these entities, and He certainly is not to be identified with them; rather, He hovers close by while remaining separate from them.
The process of Creation begins: God said: Let there be light, and there was light. It is difficult to understand the meaning or significance of the phrase “God said.” The most that can be understood from this cryptic description is that God transmitted a kind of message that there should be light, and His instruction came to pass. Light was the first creation to emerge from tohu vavohu . It was unlike any form of light known to mankind; it did not emanate from a prior source. Perhaps it was not even a physical light, but a unique phenomenon.
God saw the light that it was good. As soon as the light emerged from the unformed universe, God evaluated it and distinguished between good and bad. And God divided between the light and the darkness. Once light was created and discerned as good, the next phase of its creation began, namely, the stage of separation, which established the light as a clearly defined entity. The act of discerning and separating between good and bad would continue till the end of time and manifest itself also in human history and civilization.
God called the light day. From the inception of the concepts of light and day, there was some measure of synonymy between them. Nevertheless, they are clearly and independently defined. Aside from day’s association with daylight, the day denotes a specific period of time. At this early stage of the Creation, with the formation of light comes the establishment of time. Until this point, the universe was in a raw state, completely unstructured and undefined; even space and time were not yet defined. These concepts came into being when God willed it. And to the darkness He called night. Darkness as well is removed from its previous status as a description of space alone and placed in a framework of time. The concepts of day and night as they appear in this verse express what the Sages called the order of time, in other words, the notions of before and after, relative concepts that did not apply when the earth was still unformed and empty. The verse introduces additional new concepts: It was evening and it was morning, one day. The essence of time is comprised of evening, which is related to darkness and night, and morning, which is related to light and day. After the passage of evening and morning, one day comes to an end. Therefore, the term “day,” which previously referred specifically to the hours of light and was even identified with light, now receives an additional meaning: A unit of time that includes both the hours of light and darkness. The verse refers to this first day of Creation as “one day” instead of the first day, as the day itself is a distinct entity. In other words, the existence of one day did not indicate the existence of a second. The acts of creation that followed occurred spontaneously. Consequently, the next day may be considered the second day only in the sense that there was already one day preceding it; its existence did not derive from the existence of the first day. The creation of light, therefore, was unique, as its appearance allowed for the basic arrangement of space and time.
God said: Let there be a firmament in the midst of the water. This was not a geographical division, but a metaphysical one. And let it divide between water and water. The breaking up of the all-encompassing primordial waters was vital to the continuation of Creation. These waters would be confined and transformed into two separate entities, with the firmament separating them from one another.
God made the firmament and divided between the water that was under the firmament and the water that was above the firmament; and it was so. This division served to separate between the material and spiritual planes. From this point forward, physical matter and spirit became distinguishable from one another. They would now exist separately, in some ways interconnected but essentially independent from one another.
God called the firmament heavens [ shamayim ]. Some expound the word shamayim as sham mayim , meaning “water is there.” However, it is more likely that shamayim is the double form of sham , there there, meaning that it is located beyond. The second day of Creation also brought with it an element of measurement not with regard to space but with regard to time: It was evening and it was morning, a second day. On this day, the universe achieved a new structure. Although it did not yet resemble the universe as we know it, it now contained a hierarchical structure in addition to light.
God said: Let the water under the heavens be gathered. This refers to the physical water under the firmament, similar to the water of today. The lower waters were called upon to be gathered to one place, and let the dry land appear. When the water was collected in one place, the dry land underneath would be exposed. And it was so.
God called the dry land earth. It should not be inferred from these verses that the dry land already existed as a distinct entity, albeit under water. Rather, it seems more likely that just as the light burst forth from within the darkness, so too the dry land was initially incorporated within the water, as it were. Only on the third day did the land dry, consolidate, and become a separate entity that would now be called earth. And the gathering of the waters He called seas. The place in which the waters gathered would become a distinct entity. This includes not only actual seas, but also discrete bodies of water, such as lakes of any size. Even the basin in the Temple, which King Solomon fashioned so the priests could wash their hands and feet, is known as a sea. From this point forward, the earth and the sea would be the two largest entities in the world. And God saw that it was good. Unlike the mystifying creation of the first day, or the traumatic separation of the second, the creations of the third day were already the beginnings of the fully formed universe. The earth and the seas were given their own space and unique characteristics that would enable the flourishing of those creatures that would inhabit each of them respectively. The existence of the earth and the seas was possible only because they had been separated from each other. This combination of dry land and water, and their subsequent division, was seen by God as good.
From an outsider’s perspective, the exposure of dry land, with its tall mountains, plains, and ravines, would have seemed a most dramatic event. However, on the very same day there was another creation, even more significant for humanity: God said: Let the earth sprout grasses. The earth was commanded to bring forth various types of vegetation. If until now the Torah dealt with metaphysics and physics, the third day introduced the concept of biology. The novelty of this creation was not in the actual growth or spread of the grass; such processes occur even in a puddle of water or a mound of earth. Rather, the sprouting of the grass was unique in that it contained within it a novelty known in classical philosophy as the vegetative soul. The grass was the basis for all higher life forms that would be created later, not only because the latter depend upon vegetation in order to survive, but because they are themselves more advanced forms of things that grow. The creation of biology includes not only growth but also proliferation: Vegetation yielding seed, and fruit tree bearing fruit in its kind, in which there is its seed, upon the earth. The definition of the biological system according to a process in which a cell or group of cells start to grow, and indeed to propagate, is not new. Although this phenomenon of growth and reproduction runs counter to all considerations of physics, as it violates the laws of entropy, it is nevertheless the very definition of life. And it was so.
The earth produced grasses, vegetation yielding seed in its kind, and a tree bearing fruit in which there was its seed in its kind. The Torah does not classify the various species of vegetation; it does not even provide the criteria for categorizing them. The verse instead emphasizes that each of these creations was a species to itself; the creation of plant life was a deliberate, ordered process. And God saw that it was good. In addition to being the day on which the dry land was exposed, the third day was the day on which life was first brought forth. The significance of the emergence of life on the third day is expressed in the double appearance of the phrase “it was good” (see verse 10). Before the third day, the universe consisted only of inanimate entities; on the third day life began, even if it was not yet intelligent. Although vegetation does not share all the characteristics of more complex life forms, it possesses the foundation and source of life, namely, the ability to tend to its own survival, to grow, and to multiply.
It was evening and it was morning, a third day.
God said: Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens. From this point objects would exist that would generate and emit light. These were distinct from light itself, which was created on the first day. The addition on the fourth day of entities responsible for the light was part of the continued structuring and ordering of the universe. These lights would exist to distinguish between the day and the night. The division between day and night was significant not only from a celestial perspective, but also in establishing the rhythm of time. The function of the lights is first and foremost to measure time and divide it into segments. Specifically, let them be for signs, phenomena which occur in heaven and on earth, and for seasons, and for days and years.
Let them be for lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light upon the earth; and it was so.
God made the two great lights, as they appear today: the greater light, the sun, to rule the day, and the lesser light, the moon, to rule the night, and the stars.
God set them in the firmament of the heavens to give light upon the earth
and to rule during the day and during the night. The sun and moon appear to human beings as rulers over day and night, as it is impossible for one to fail to notice the presence of the sun or its absence, and it is likewise impossible to miss the appearance or disappearance of the moon. And these lights also serve to divide between the light and the darkness. Although earlier verses already referred to day and night, and to morning and evening, and connected them to light and darkness, these entities were not completely defined until now. And God saw that it was good.
It was evening and it was morning, a fourth day.
From vegetation and the heavenly bodies, the verse addresses the creation of animals: God said: Let the water swarm with swarms [ sheretz ] of living creatures [ nefesh ĥaya ]. These creatures would not grow and develop blindly, like vegetation, but would have the ability to move and some measure of will. The word sheretz may allude to wanting, retziya , or running, ritza . Note that the first appearance of the phrase nefesh ĥaya is in connection with aquatic creatures; it appears again only later with regard to land animals. Perhaps this is because water is the first source for creation and for the continued existence of life. And let birds fly above the earth on the face of the firmament of the heavens.
God created the great serpents [ taninim ]. In several places in the Bible, the tanin is identified with the livyatan or some creature resembling it. In modern Hebrew, livyatan refers to a whale while tanin refers to an alligator, but these are not their biblical meanings. Rather, the tanin and livyatan are mysterious aquatic creatures that were created in the water and whose relationship to our world is unclear. In several places in the Bible they are depicted as enormously powerful monsters, which at times do not accept the authority even of God. And every living creature that crawls, with which the water swarmed in their kinds. The variety of living creatures ranges from tiny fish that fill rivers, lakes, and streams to powerful sharks, and even to the great sea monsters, whose existence borders on the abstract and which may possess some form of intelligence. And every winged bird in its kind, a myriad of species. And God saw that it was good.
God blessed them, saying: Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the water in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth. Vegetation propagates automatically; it does not require action on its own part to multiply. By contrast, the reproductive processes of animals, whether flying, aquatic, or amphibious, involve the search for a mate. Consequently, they required a special blessing that would instill within them the active drive to be fruitful and multiply.
It was evening and it was morning, a fifth day.
Up to this point, God had created aquatic creatures and birds, the latter being either more advanced forms of sea life or creatures formed from swamps, a combination of land and sea. On the sixth day, God created land creatures: God said: Let the earth produce living creatures in its kind, animals of many types, not just domesticated ones, and crawling creatures. This is not meant as a zoological definition, but as a description of animal life from a human perspective. That is to say, the term “crawling creatures” refers to the small animals that swarm on the ground, such as mice and snakes. And let the earth produce beasts of the earth in its kind. The Torah distinguishes between animals [ behema ] and beasts [ ĥaya ]. Some suggest that ĥaya refers to predatory animals, whereas behema refers to herbivores. And it was so.
God made the beasts of the earth in its kind, and the animals in its kind, and every creature that crawls upon the ground in its kind; and God saw that it was good.
This verse is the climax of the entire account of Creation: God said: Let Us make Man in Our image, in Our likeness. Although in a physiological sense man is very similar to other living creatures, he is nevertheless a category of being to himself. Unlike other creations, man was fashioned in the image of God, not in terms of his appearance, but in terms of his essence. Aside from man’s superior intelligence, this likeness is expressed principally in man’s freedom to choose. This quality is unique to man and God. The rest of creation moves within its respective circles, always subject to a long chain of cause and effect. Humans are not bound by these chains. And let them dominate over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the heavens, and over the animals, and over all the earth, meaning over the inanimate substances, and over every crawling creature that crawls upon the earth.
God created man in His own image, granting him freedom and the capacity to expand and alter his surroundings; in the image of God He created him. The verse notes: Male and female He created them. The Torah will later elaborate on this statement. In theory, man could have been created as one, just as God is one. The fact that man was created male and female indicates that mankind is part of the world’s system of living creatures. The Torah’s emphasis on this fact indicates that it does not refer to man as an individual, but as a species, whose beginnings are described in this verse. On the other hand, although the other creatures were also created male and female, the Torah mentions the creation of male and female counterparts only with regard to mankind. This serves to emphasize that the difference between man and woman is not merely biological, but fundamental as well.
God blessed them; and God also said to them: Be fruitful, and multiply. Since the propagation of mankind, unlike that of plants, requires a conscious reproductive act, this was the first command addressed to man as a subject with free will. The second commandment is: And fill the earth. It is not enough for man to be fruitful and multiply. He must also spread out across the entire planet, settle it, and subdue it. Of course this does not negate the presence of other creatures on the earth. Nevertheless, man has a special obligation to populate the world, to cultivate and tame it. And finally, you must rule over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the heavens, and over every living creature that crawls upon the earth.
God said: Behold, I have given you, for now at least, all vegetation yielding seed that is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in which there is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for food. You may take your sustenance from all types of plants, herbs, vegetables, and fruit, as you see fit.
And to every beast of the earth, and to every bird of the heavens, and to everything that crawls upon the earth, in which there is a living soul, I have given all green vegetation for food. And it was so. It is possible that when all life forms were first created, they were herbivorous. However, perhaps there was no prohibition against receiving sustenance from living creatures or their carcasses, only against killing living creatures. It is permitted for man and beast to derive their sustenance from vegetation, because they each possess an animate soul, making them superior to plants.
God saw everything that He had made, in its entirety, from light to man, and, behold, it was very good. It was evening and it was morning, the sixth day.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 02
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 02 somebodyThe heavens and the earth and their entire host, the abundance of creatures contained within them, with all their abilities and roles, were completed.
God completed on the seventh day His works that He had made on the previous six days; He rested on the seventh day from all His works that He had made. Concluded is the process in which new, unique creations were formed on each day. From this point forward, the world will continue its existence according to the order that has been determined for it.
Due to the unique nature of the Sabbath, God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it with additional holiness; because on it He rested from all His works that God created to make.
This is the legacy of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, on the day that the Lord God made earth and heaven.
At this stage the world was still incomplete, as no shrub of the field was yet in the earth, and no vegetation of the field had yet sprouted; because the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth. Although rain is a part of the natural order of the world, it was not mentioned in the previous chapter alongside the formation of the seas, dry land, or vegetation. Since it had not yet rained, the plants were unable to fully grow. The Sages teach that the plants initially only barely emerged from the ground. When the first man was created, he prayed for them, and the first rains came, causing the plants to sprout and grow. And there was no man to till the ground. People can work the land even when there is no rainfall, by drawing water from elsewhere. Without man, however, the land remained unworked.
A mist would rise from the earth, and water the entire surface of the ground. The essence of rain already existed, but the complete hydrological cycle was not yet in place. The Torah here describes a primordial water cycle: Mist would rise from the earth, condense, and fall to water the ground.
The creation of vegetation, which occurred on the third day of Creation, will soon be described in detail. But first the Torah elaborates on the creation and actions of a far more important entity, man, whose formation was previously depicted only in general terms: The Lord God formed man of dust from the ground. Unlike the other created beings, which were fashioned in one step, God created man in stages: First he was a lump of earth, a purely physical entity known by the Sages as a golem . And He then breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, giving life to this inanimate object. Man became a living creature. The soul of man is living not only in the sense that it is not dead, but also in that it contains a special vitality: It is a speaking soul. The breath of life within man is not just an abstract entity or form of sanctity concealed inside him; rather, it radiates outward from within him.
As part of the Creation process, the Lord God planted a garden, in the place known as Eden to the east . Although Eden refers to a place, the word itself means pleasure. The ambiguity and mystery regarding this location is further accentuated by the fact that the verse describes it as located eastward without offering any point of reference. This place is a lost world outside the realm of our current experience. He placed there the man whom He had formed.
The Lord God grew from the ground in the Garden of Eden every tree that is pleasant to the sight and good for food, and the tree of life, which will be discussed later, in the midst of the garden, in the center, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
A river emerged from Eden to water the garden; and from there it, the river, would part and would become four headwaters.
The name of the one is Pishon; it is that which encircles the entire land of Havila, where the gold is found. Pishon is generally identified with the Nile.
The gold in the deposits of that land is of particularly good quality; there is also bdellium and the onyx stone.
The name of the second river is Gihon; it is that which encircles the entire land of Kush. It is possible that Kush is modern-day Ethiopia. Some identify Kush as the mountain range known today as the Hindu Kush, which stretches between modern-day Afghanistan and Pakistan.
The name of the third river is Tigris; it is that which goes east of Ashur. The Tigris is an immense river in Mesopotamia, known even today by this name. And the fourth river is Euphrates. There is no need for the verse to elaborate on the location of the Euphrates, as throughout virtually the entire Bible, whenever a verse mentions a river without further specification, it refers to the Euphrates. This river serves as the border between the lands of the Middle East and the surrounding lands. This is also the meaning of the expression “beyond the river,” which appears throughout the Bible and rabbinic literature, as well as in archaeological findings.
The Lord God took the man, and placed him in the Garden of Eden to cultivate it and to keep it. In contrast to the other creations scattered throughout the garden, the man was placed there for a particular purpose, namely, to cultivate the ground and to keep it. Just as in the previous chapter man was commanded to rule over the entire world, here man is given responsibility over a part of this otherworldly place. The world was not yet functioning in its fixed manner; perhaps rain never fell in the Garden of Eden, which instead drew all its sustenance from the river flowing through it and required the care of man. Consequently, it was of great importance for the man to cultivate the garden and to protect it from harm.
The Lord God commanded the man, saying: From every tree of the garden you may eat, and from them you shall draw your sustenance.
But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, you shall not eat; for on the day that you eat of it you shall die. If you eat from this tree, you will die.
The Lord God said: It is not good that the man shall be alone. All living creatures were created male and female, and they were meant to multiply. Only man was created without a mate. Is one to conclude, then, that man was never meant to procreate? Perhaps God created man in His image, with intelligence and free will, as His parallel in this world. If so, just as God is alone above, man was likewise alone below, and this is how he was meant to fulfill his duties. To rule out this understanding, the Torah states that it is not good, neither for man himself nor for the world, for him to be alone. God continued: Therefore, I will make for him a helper alongside him, someone who completes him. Man requires a partnership with another being; this partnership would signify the beginning of humanity.
To that end, the Lord God formed from the ground every beast of the field and every bird of the heavens and brought them to the man, master of creation below, to see what he would call it. Whatever the man would call every living creature, that was its name.
The man called names for every animal, and for the birds of the heavens and for the beasts of the field; but after all the animals passed before him to receive their names, it became apparent that for Adam, he did not find a helper to be alongside him; there was no other human being. In a world without nomenclature, each entity was completely unique and uncategorized. The ability to categorize similar creatures into groups and species and apply names to them is contingent on the cognitive abilities of association. Before he began to use these faculties, it is possible that Adam was unaware that he was alone. He lived in a world without classification and considered himself to be just another one of a myriad of creatures. Once Adam began to categorize the types of vegetation and male and female animals, he became acutely aware of his aloneness, as he realized that none of the individual creatures he encountered was suitable for him.
The Lord God cast a deep sleep upon the man, and he slept; He took one of his sides [ tzalotav ]. Although many commentaries interpret the word tzela as rib, it seems more likely tzela refers to a whole side of the body. If so, one must conclude that the man was originally created with a double body, one half of which was separated from him now. And God closed with flesh in its place, where He had removed this side.
The Lord God built the side that He took from the man into a woman, whose form differed from that of a man, and brought her to the man after he awakened.
Before the man fell into a deep sleep the woman was part of him. Only at this point, the man said: This time, this particular entity, is a bone from my bones, and flesh from my flesh. On the one hand, the man realized that the woman was a part of his original composition; on the other hand, he knew that she was a stranger to him. What was once a single being was now divided into two separate entities that were capable of relating to one another. This shall be called woman [ isha ], because this was taken from man [ ish ]. The linguistic similarity between the terms representing man and woman, ish and isha , attests to the resemblance between them.
Since man and woman were not created as separate beings, their relationship is unique among creations. Unlike the males and females of the animal world, which have always been separate entities that develop independently, man and woman were once a single person. This unique status is what creates the special bond of love between a man and a woman and gives meaning to the institution of marriage. Therefore, a man shall leave his father and his mother, and he shall cleave to his wife, and they shall become one flesh. Initially, the strongest bond between members of a family is the bond between a child and his parents. Nevertheless, the bond between husband and wife surpasses even the bond between a person and the family of his childhood. One’s bond with one’s parents certainly remains even after marrying, but it grows weaker.
The verse provides some background for events that will be described below: They were both naked, the man and his wife, and they were not ashamed. Like the other living creatures, the man and his wife did not need clothing in the Garden of Eden. As part of the natural world, humanity was originally bare and exposed.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 03
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 03 somebodyThe serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field that the Lord God had made. The serpent was clever; it possessed intelligence. Although the word “cunning” [ arum ] usually has negative connotations in modern Hebrew, in the Bible it is a neutral term. Furthermore, this primeval serpent was not the same as the diminished snake we know today, but a wholly intelligent creature. He said to the woman: Did God actually say: You shall not eat of any tree of the garden? Perhaps the serpent chose to address the woman because God did not speak directly to her but to the man, reasoning that since she had heard of the prohibition only through an intermediary, it would be easier to incite and deceive her. Although when God forbade man from partaking of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil the woman was still a part of him, one must conclude that only the male side heard the command directly from God.
The woman said to the serpent: From the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat. God did not prohibit us from eating the fruit of the garden.
But from the fruit of the tree that is in the midst, the middle, of the garden, God said: You shall not eat of it, nor shall you touch it, lest you die. This is a dangerous tree. It is prohibited for us to eat from this tree, or even to touch it, as death resides within it.
In response to this claim, the serpent said to the woman: You will not die. There is no need for you to fear that you might die, as the tree of the knowledge of good and evil does not cause death. The serpent could speak to the woman about this matter with the confidence of being a reliable source, because man was created last, and consequently all the other creatures had more life experience than he had.
The serpent now revealed the ostensible motivation for the divine prohibition: For God knows that on the day you eat from it, then your eyes shall be opened, and you shall be as God, knowers of good and evil. God does not want you to eat from this tree, not because it is dangerous, but because by consuming it you will be raised to a higher level. God seeks to prevent you from acquiring the knowledge of good and evil that He possesses.
The woman saw that the tree was good for eating. The woman began to submit to temptation, thus marking the beginning of the sin. Of course the root of this sin preceded its execution; it was based on the willingness to even consider the possibility of violating a divine command. This did not occur to the woman on her own; it was the serpent who presented her with the option of defiance. Perhaps before the serpent spoke to her she was afraid of the tree and refrained from gazing at it or from reflecting on its nature and the effect of its fruit. But after it spoke to her she saw that the tree was as good as all the others, and that it was an enticement to the eyes, and that the tree was attractive to apprehend. There was something intriguing about this tree that made one desire to approach and understand it. She took from its fruit and ate; she also gave to her husband with her, and he ate. In the manner of a good wife who loves her husband, she immediately shared her great discovery with him.
The eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked. Obviously, the man and woman were always aware of their nakedness. Indeed, their nakedness is already mentioned, as a matter of fact, at the end of the previous chapter. However, at first they were not ashamed of their naked state, just as people are not embarrassed to expose their noses or their eyes. Like the animals, all parts of their bodies were considered equal in their eyes. Partaking of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil injected something new into their consciousness: A separation of the various forms of good, namely, aesthetics, pleasure, utility, and morality. This new awareness does not mean that until this point they were unaware of their sexuality. However, before eating of the fruit of the tree, they engaged in the sexual act as animals do, with complete innocence and unselfconsciousness. Now they became aware of the unique nature of human sexuality, and into their world was introduced a new sort of inclination. Unlike the sexual drive of animals, which is part of their biological compulsion and limited by objective factors of need and satiation, the human sexual urge is based on a potentially boundless erotic desire. The man and woman were suddenly faced with their ability to choose to what extent to indulge these newly discovered inclinations, and thus found themselves before a gaping chasm. Consequently, they sewed fig leaves, and made themselves loincloths. Since their nakedness was no longer a neutral state but a source of provocation and temptation, it was not to be publicly displayed; they therefore hurried to cover themselves.
It is difficult to appreciate the severity of the sin of the first man, who violated the sole command God had imposed upon him. From this point forward, humanity’s penchant for sinning would fall to the greatest depths. Perhaps the first man foresaw this and recoiled. It is possible that the man and woman were perplexed, even dazed and intoxicated, by the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. They heard the voice of the Lord God as though it were moving in the garden with the day breeze. The Divine Presence was particularly manifest in the Garden of Eden. The man and his wife hid from the presence of the Lord God among the trees of the garden. Before sinning, the man and his wife were like young children, who do only what they are supposed to do and are therefore not ashamed of their actions. For the first time, they sensed that they had acted improperly and felt ashamed and sought to hide.
The Lord God called to the man, and said to him: Where are you? This question is, of course, not designed to elicit information. It is a summons: Where are you? Stand before Me!
He, the man, apologized and said: I heard Your voice in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked, and I hid. I am not standing in the open, because I am confused and ashamed. I hid because I did not want to be seen in my nakedness.
He, God, said: Who told you that you were naked, that there is something wrong with your nakedness? You were naked beforehand as well, and yet you were not ashamed. Clearly, God was not referring to man’s physical nakedness, as even an animal could have discerned this. Did you eat from the tree from which I commanded you not to eat? This was also a rhetorical question, meant to test the man’s response.
Despite all he had learned about good and evil, the man had not yet learned how to lie. His response was therefore not a distortion of reality. However, it was also not a direct response. Having internalized the serpent’s cunning, the man did not respond: Yes, or: I sinned. Rather, the man said: The woman whom You gave to be with me, she gave me from the tree, and I ate. You created a woman for me, and she gave me the fruit. By referring to his wife as the woman whom God gave to be with him, the man shirked responsibility for his actions and sought to shift the blame onto her and onto God.
The Lord God said to the woman: What is this you have done? Why did you consume the fruit, and why did you give it to your husband? The woman said: The serpent enticed me, and I ate. She also absolved herself of responsibility, although her response was indeed very close to the truth. The woman claimed that she herself would never have conceived of such a deed. Rather, another entity, the serpent, persuaded her with its crafty ways to eat from the fruit. Nevertheless, the woman did not seek to blame God.
The Lord God said to the serpent. God did not ask the serpent why it behaved as it did, because unlike the man and his wife, the serpent had no justification for its actions. It acted out of a profound wickedness whose purpose was to break open the depths of evil, or simply for its amusement. Even if the serpent did not intend to bring about the tremendous upheaval in the world that resulted from its actions or the expulsion from the Garden of Eden, the serpent’s words stemmed from the malicious thought: Perhaps we should do the very opposite of God’s wishes. God therefore cursed the serpent: Because you did this, cursed are you from among all the animals, and from all the beasts of the field; upon your belly shall you go, and dust shall you eat all the days of your life. It can be inferred from the verse that the serpent previously walked on legs.
God declared an additional punishment: I will place enmity between you and the woman, and between your descendants and her descendants. If, for whatever reason, you sought to establish a connection with the woman, your efforts will be unsuccessful. Henceforth, an irrational hatred will prevail between you and the woman, and between your descendants and hers. This hatred will be expressed by the fact that he shall strike your head, and you shall strike his heel.
To the woman He said. The curses placed upon the woman distinguish the female human from the females of the animal kingdom: I will increase your suffering; your life will involve much pain. Some explain this as a reference to the menstrual cycle, which has no counterpart in most animals and which is unpleasant and sometimes even painful. And I will increase the difficulty of your pregnancy. Human pregnancy is not as simple or straightforward as that of other creatures. This is partly due to human psychology and partly due to physiology. The same applies to childbirth: In pain you shall give birth to children. And furthermore, your desire shall be for your husband. Since you initiated this action, that is, you were proactive in tempting your husband and attempting to create a new reality, you will henceforth yearn for your husband. Although this is not an adverse state of affairs, it involves a measure of passivity on the woman’s part. And he shall rule over you, not necessarily in terms of a social order, but in the context of sexual relations. The woman was cursed that man and woman would no longer be equal partners. Since the woman wanted to know evil, she would experience suffering; since she sought to lead her husband, she would now be led by him.
And to Adam He said: Because you heeded the voice of your wife, and ate from the tree that I commanded you, saying: You shall not eat from it, your sin is more severe, as you heeded the voice of your wife despite hearing the prohibition directly from Me. Therefore, cursed is the ground on your account. No longer will the ground be like the fertile soil of the Garden of Eden, which gave forth produce without any toil on your part, and which you only had to protect from damage. From now on, mankind’s relationship with the ground will be different: In suffering, through toil, shall you eat of it all the days of your life.
And unlike in the Garden of Eden, if you wait for the ground to produce its fruit spontaneously, then thorns and thistles shall it grow for you; and you shall eat the vegetation of the field, which will not always be edible in its natural state.
In order for the vegetation of the field to be fit for consumption, you will have to toil over its growth. You will no longer be able to consume all produce in its natural state. Rather, by the sweat of your brow shall you eat bread. Until now you have lived in a world in which everything was prepared for you. Henceforth, you will have to exert great effort to produce your food, until you return to the ground; for from it were you taken. Ultimately, you will die. For you are dust, and to dust shall you return.
The man called the name of his wife Eve [Ĥavva]. Before the man imagined that other people would inhabit the earth, there was no reason for him to give his wife a name. He was man and she was woman, and that was sufficient. After learning of their mortality and that the woman would give birth to other people who would replace them, he gave her a name. He chose this name because she was the mother of all living [ ĥai ]. There is much affection and love in the selection of this particular name. Adam could have chosen many other names; he could even have given her a name that reflected some resentment toward her. Despite everything, he called her Ĥavva, as if to say to her: From you life will come to the world.
The Lord God made for Adam and for his wife hide tunics and clothed them. God took into account the shame and vulnerability that Adam and Eve felt in the wake of their sin. He wished to assist them on their new path, so He clothed them.
The Lord God said: Behold, the man has become as one of us, like one of the heavenly beings, as he has the capacity to know good and evil. Man no longer acts solely based on instinct or what he is told, but in accordance with his own free will. And now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also from the tree of life, and eat, and live forever. Although the tree of life was in the garden the entire time, it seems that it did not attract the attention of Adam or Eve. Unlike the enticing tree of the knowledge of good and evil, whose fruits were particularly desirable, perhaps the tree of life was a simple tree whose fruit was unimpressive. However, following man’s recent dramatic awareness of his mortality, he might have sought ways to avoid death. It is possible that no prohibition or threat would prevent him from making use of that which could grant him eternal life.
Therefore, the Lord God sent him out from the Garden of Eden, to cultivate the ground from which he was taken. Man returned to the unremarkable land outside the Garden of Eden.
The man was not sent from the garden in a leisurely manner; rather, He, God, banished the man; He stationed the cherubs, a type of angel, east [ kedem ] of the Garden of Eden. Perhaps the entrance to the garden was on its eastern side, as was the case in the Temple. Alternatively, kedem simply refers to the front of the garden, in whatever direction it may have been. And He placed the blade of the ever-turning sword, which blocked the way, to guard the path to the tree of life, at least for the time being, until God decides to return the man to the Garden of Eden. Angels and heavenly forces of deterrence removed the possibility of immortality from man’s grasp. The man understood that he could no longer return to the garden, and that he had to seek his destiny elsewhere.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 04
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 04 somebodyThe man had been intimate with Eve his wife while they were still in the Garden of Eden. Since Eve gave birth after their banishment, the verse relates the entire story here. And she conceived and gave birth to Cain and said: I have acquired [ kaniti ] a man with the Lord. Eve was amazed by the first human birth, at the fact that she, together with God, created a man that until now did not exist. Eve felt that she could not create man by herself; she was instead a partner with God in giving birth to this new being. To this day, women in labor, and indeed people in general, express similar astonishment at the wonder of childbirth.
She continued to give birth to his brother, who was called Abel. In contrast to Cain, no reason is given for the choice of Abel’s name. Many explain that the name alludes to Abel’s sad demise; like hevel , vapor, nothing was left of him. His name can also be interpreted in a positive manner, as a reference to a breath of wind, as if the birth of Abel revealed something of a spiritual nature. If so, this passage touches on the foundations of human existence: The first child, Cain, sparked amazement at the birth process itself, whereas the second child, Abel, revealed the wonder of diversity, which is inherent in the human spirit. Although mankind would eventually become accustomed to these marvels, for Adam and Eve the fact that such diverse children could emerge from the same parents was truly remarkable. It is unknown how these two children differed from one another at birth, although the differences between them eventually manifested themselves in behavior: Abel was a shepherd; he would milk the sheep and shear their wool, but he did not eat their meat; and Cain was a cultivator of the ground.
It happened, after some time, perhaps years later. According to one opinion, this occurred forty years after the birth of Cain and Abel. Cain brought from the fruit of the ground an offering to the Lord. In contrast to various theories claiming otherwise, this episode indicates the fundamental nature of bringing an offering and that this concept was not introduced by foreign cultures. From the very beginnings of humanity, people felt the need to bring gifts to God. Later, these gift offerings would be called burnt offerings, as they were burnt in their entirety in God’s honor. These offerings were not considered a tax; they were not even obligatory. Although the Recipient of the gift has no need for it, the gift offering allows the giver to express his feelings toward Him.
And Abel, he too brought an offering to God from the firstborn of his flock and from the choicest of them; and the Lord turned toward Abel and to his offering. The verse does not explain how this acceptance expressed itself. Perhaps a fire descended from heaven upon Abel’s offering, as occurred in other instances, or perhaps it was evident that Abel’s offering was accepted because he was in high spirits or experienced some euphoric state.
But toward Cain and to his offering He did not turn. The two brothers were presumably close in age and had similar characteristics. God’s preference for one brother over the other was therefore highly upsetting for the one who was rejected. Cain was very incensed, and his face became downcast. Understood literally, this expression is an accurate and straightforward description of the behavior of a shamed, disappointed, and angry individual, who lowers his face toward the ground.
The Lord said to Cain: Why are you incensed, and why did your face become downcast? While it is true that I chose Abel, why are you angry? Although you were not chosen, I did not harm you. Why, then, do you feel despised and ashamed? God reproved Cain for his jealousy, an emotion that easily leads to unjustified rage.
Truly, if you do good, you will be elevated. If you improve your deeds and behave properly, you will be elevated. This phrase might be an indication that Cain did not bring his offering wholeheartedly, or that he did not select his choicest produce, as expounded by the Sages. And if you do not do good, remember that sin crouches at the entrance. Beyond the very existence of evil is the concept of sin, which is the introduction of evil into the world through the deeds of man. In this figurative representation, sin is depicted as a living creature that prowls at an entrance and seeks to enter. Behind this verse lies the perception that when a person acts properly, he thereby prevents sin from controlling him, while if he does not, even if he does not actually perform evil, sin crouches at the entrance. And its desire is for you. In contrast to the common perception of man as the one who desires to sin, the verse describes the personified sin as seeking to control man. But you may rule over it. It is within man’s potential to rule over sin. He must keep in mind that sin is ever present, and that it seeks to build itself and grow powerful by attaching itself to him. As long as man is the one in control, and he does not let it conquer him, his existence is assured.
Although Cain heard the words of God, he did not internalize them at all and held firm to his jealousy: Cain said to Abel his brother. The verse does not specify what Cain said to Abel. Perhaps he suggested that they travel somewhere together. Maybe he leveled harsh accusations against him or informed him of God’s statement. In any case, there was some conversation between Cain and Abel that amplified the friction between them: It happened when they were in the field, when they happened to be alone, that Cain arose against Abel his brother and killed him. In his overpowering rage, Cain fell upon Abel and killed him.
At the dawn of humanity, man was still capable of hearing the word of God directly: The Lord said to Cain: Where is Abel your brother? Similar to the question posed to Adam on the heels of his transgression: Where are you? God turned to Cain with a question following his sin. There were many possible responses to God’s question. Cain could have broken down in tears and admitted that he had committed a terrible crime. Instead, he feigned ignorance: He said: I do not know. It is unknown what Cain did with Abel’s body after killing him. Perhaps he threw it aside, or buried it, or maybe he simply left it untouched. It is entirely possible that Cain’s response was sincere, as this was the first human death. If so, his response bears relevance to one of mankind’s burning questions: What happens to a person after he dies? Nevertheless, the conclusion of his response indicates a denial of responsibility: Am I my brother’s keeper?
He, God, said to Cain: What have you done? Think about your actions. Do not behave like those individuals, and this includes criminals, who attempt to justify or rationalize their behavior by claiming: It happened spontaneously, or: I lost my temper. The voice of your brother’s blood cries out to Me from the ground. The murder itself calls out with the cry of unfulfilled life. The spilled blood screams out not only over the pain and the injustice but also for the loss of life itself.
Now, cursed are you from the ground that opened its mouth to take your brother’s blood from your hand. In contrast to the various midrashim that discuss how the blood of certain murder victims was not swallowed up by and continued to bubble up on the ground, Abel’s blood was accepted by the ground, as it were, and absorbed by it. The ground is therefore involved in Cain’s curse.
When you cultivate the ground, it shall not continue giving its strength to you. The ground is cursed on your account; it shall cease to be a source of life for you. Instead, restless and itinerant shall you be on the earth. You shall wander the earth and suffice with what you find during your travels. You are not banished from the ground itself, but from its produce. You no longer have any share in the life stored in the ground.
Cain said to the Lord: My punishment [ avoni ] is greater than I can bear. Although the word avon is usually interpreted as iniquity, it seems more likely that Cain was referring to his punishment rather than the deed itself. Indeed, there are many instances in which the words avon , iniquity, ĥet , transgression, and pesha , sin, are used in reference to a punishment instead of a deed. This interpretation suits the continuation of Cain’s statement:
Behold, You have banished me this day from the face of the land. The ground no longer accepts me, and I feel as though the land is burning beneath my feet. Consequently, I cannot settle anywhere. And from Your face shall I be hidden. How will I be able to present myself before You? Cain was warned that sin crouches at the entrance (4:7). Now, after allowing sin to control him to such an extent that he killed his brother, he was too ashamed to bare his face before God. I shall be restless and itinerant on the earth, and anyone who finds me will kill me. I am now exposed to all the dangers of the world. I will find no security anywhere on earth; I cannot even take shelter in Your presence, and I am unprotected from other living creatures. Cain’s statement expresses the loneliness of a murderer, who feels that the entire world despises him.
The Lord said to him: Therefore, anyone who kills Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. Although you sinned, you will not be punished with immediate death. Rather, you shall be provided with some form of protection, so that you will be able to continue living. The Lord placed a sign for Cain, so that anyone who finds him shall not smite him. This sign, whatever it was, somehow enabled Cain to bear his punishment.
Cain departed from the presence of the Lord and lived in the land of Nod, east of Eden. Some commentaries hold that this was an actual land called Nod. Others interpret the verse as meaning that Cain attempted to settle in various lands, but he was cast out of each one. Consequently, he was left to wander [ noded ] from land to land. According to this explanation, the emphasis on the fact that Cain dwelled east of Eden serves to further highlight Cain’s broken state: Cain was from the second generation following the banishment from the Garden of Eden, and now he himself had been exiled.
At this stage, the propagation of the human race was effected through marriage between siblings. Adam and Eve begot girls, who became their brothers’ wives: Cain was intimate with his wife and she conceived, and gave birth to a son called Hanokh; he, Cain, was the builder of a city. Cain was not just the cursed son; he was also the creative son. As the preceding verses will describe, this creativity was apparent in his descendants as well. And he, Cain, called the name of the city after the name of his son Hanokh. This name alludes to ĥanikha , beginning. Cain chose this name for the city because it marked the beginning of the craft of building. It may also serve as an indication that Cain became educated [ hitĥanekh ]. However, Cain’s central motive in building a city was his desire to connect to a place and establish roots within it. However, due to the curse imposed upon him, he was unable to actually live in this city. Indeed, the Torah refers to Cain’s construction of the city in the progressive tense, indicating that it was never definitely completed. Rather, throughout his wanderings to and from the land of Nod, he would return to this place to add a stone or two. In this manner, the city was slowly built.
The verse lists Cain’s descendants. A son called Irad was born to Hanokh; and Irad begot Mehuyael; and Mehuyael begot Metushael; and Metushael begot Lemekh. A comparison with the genealogy in the following chapter reveals that the descendants of Seth had names that were similar to those of the descendants of Cain. Apparently, in those times, many children born in the same generation were called by similar names.
The verse momentarily dwells on Lemekh on account of his unique behavior: Lemekh took for himself two wives. This is possibly the first instance of polygamy. At first each man married just one woman. This was never explicitly commanded by God, but arose from a basic intuition. Still, by taking two wives Lemekh breached the existing boundaries. This is a further expression of the ambition of Cain’s family to grow and create, although it is possible that Lemekh simply lusted after more than one woman or that he married his second wife because the first had yet to produce children. The name of one was Ada, and the name of the other Tzila.
Ada gave birth to Yaval; he was the forerunner of those who dwell in tents and raise livestock. Yaval, like his father Lemekh, introduced a new practice. Perhaps he was trying to continue Abel’s legacy; indeed, even their names are similar. Although shepherding was already introduced by Abel, he left no descendants, vanishing from the world like hevel , vapor. As a result, a culture of shepherding had yet to develop. By contrast, Cain sought to establish a stable agricultural society, and it can be assumed that his sons followed him and cultivated the ground as well. In addition, Cain sought to build a city, a permanent settlement. Here, one of Cain’s descendants returned to the practice of shepherding and developed it into a distinct culture, thus becoming the forerunner of those who dwell in tents and among livestock.
And the name of his brother was Yuval. Yuval, like many of Cain’s progeny, was a creative individual; he was the forerunner of all those who grasp the harp and pipe. He was the first musician, the inventor of the first musical instruments.
And Tzila, she too gave birth to Tuval Cain. Just as the names Yaval and Yuval are reminiscent of Abel, the name Tuval Cain combines Abel with Cain, patriarch of this family. Tuval Cain was the forger of every sharp instrument of bronze and iron; he was the first metalworker. Until Tuval Cain, people relied on the simplest materials that were readily available in nature. Tuval Cain’s revolutionary discovery was the extraction of copper and iron from the earth. Although some have criticized Tuval Cain for being responsible for introducing armaments into the world, the verse refers explicitly only to the creative act of metalworking, with no mention of weapons. And the sister of Tuval Cain was Naama.
Lemekh said to his wives. This is the first poem in the Torah. It is structured in the form of parallels between pairs of phrases, as is common in the poetry of the Bible: Ada and Tzila, hear my voice; wives of Lemekh, listen to my speech; for I have slain a man for my wound and a child for my injury. The Torah does not provide the background for Lemekh’s poem. According to one midrash, Lemekh killed Cain unwittingly, and the phrase “I have slain a man” is Lemekh’s confession. Some commentaries maintain that Lemekh’s statement is not an expression of regret but a boast, as if to say: One who wounds me or bruises me I will kill. It is possible that Lemekh was confessing to his wives that he too participated in some act of killing, not necessarily the murder of Cain, but that he acted unwittingly.
Therefore, as Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, and Lemekh seventy-seven-fold. If God had pity upon Cain and assured him that he would be avenged sevenfold, then I, who killed unwittingly, deserve even greater protection than that provided to Cain (verse 15).
At first, Adam and Eve had two sons, until one killed the other. It is possible that because of this terrible tragedy of the first murder in the first family, the couple did not immediately want to reproduce. Perhaps they wondered whether they even wanted to bring another child into the world. It took some time until they recovered, after which Adam was intimate with his wife again and she gave birth to a son, and she called his name Seth [Shet]: As God has provided [ shat ] me with another offspring in place of Abel, as Cain killed him. From the continuation of the record of human history, it emerges that Seth was the foundation of mankind. All of humanity descended from him, effectively making him the father of the human race. This is why the Bible uses the expression “sons of Seth” as a synonym for sons of Adam, or people.
And to Seth too a son was born; and he called his name Enosh. The name Enosh is also used as a synonym for mankind. Then commenced [ huĥal ] proclaiming the name of the Lord. There are two opposing interpretations of this statement. According to one opinion, this means that during the period of Enosh, people began to institute prayer and organized worship. Previously, Cain and Abel brought offerings out of a spontaneous religious awakening, without any temple or established structure for worship. Only in the generation of Enosh, when human society grew, did there develop an orderly forum for calling in the name of God. According to the second opinion, the term huĥal relates to the words ĥullin , non-sacred, and ĥillul , desecration. That is, in the days of Enosh people began to desecrate the name of God by introducing idol worship. Initially, idolaters believed in the oneness of God, but they thought that entities through which His power is expressed, either through impressive force, beauty, or some unique quality, were also worthy of reverence. It is only a short leap from such a belief to deifying the entities themselves. The calling of various objects and powers in the name of God, whether this occurred at once or as a gradual process of deterioration that merely began in the generation of Enosh, is at the root of idol worship.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 05
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 05 somebodyThis is the book of the legacy of Adam. Although the Torah already discussed the events of Adam’s life, that was not a historical record with any chronological context. Until here, the Torah has presented fundamental paradigms: the Garden of Eden, the sin and its punishment, choosing evil, the first children, sibling rivalry, the first murder, and regret. This chapter provides a short survey of many generations, beginning with the dawn of human history. This process began on the day that God created man, in the likeness of God He made him. The uniqueness of man is that he was created in the likeness of God, and his history therefore merits special attention.
Male and female He created them. Earlier, the Torah detailed the complex process of creating man. Here it simply states that the male and the female were initially created together. Though this might seem to contradict the previous account, wherein the woman was built from the man while he was in a deep sleep (2:21–22), that was merely a procedure in which the theretofore unified male and female forms were separated from one another. He blessed them, and He called their name Man [Adam], on the day they were created. Of the various terms for human beings, including Adam, ish , Enosh, and gever , Adam is the primary name for the human race and most representative of its essence, both because man was created from the adama , ground (2:7), and because he was formed in the demut , likeness, of God (see verse 1; 1:26). Indeed, this is how the Sages explain the verse: “I will be like [ edammeh ] the Most High.”
Adam lived one hundred and thirty years, and begot a son in his likeness, after his image. Some commentaries maintain that before this time, he begot defective offspring who were not in his likeness or after his image. However, the plain meaning of the text is that the child born after 130 years resembled Adam, and this has no bearing on any kind of defect in other offspring. And he called his name Seth [Shet]. This name resembles the word tashtit , foundation, as humanity was founded upon him.
The Torah now provides an extremely brief list of the generations until the time of the flood: The days of Adam after he begot Seth were eight hundred years; and during this time he begot sons and daughters. The Torah does not provide the names of these children or any details of their lives, as they have no importance for the reader.
All the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years; and he died.
Seth lived one hundred and five years, and he begot Enosh.
Seth lived after he begot Enosh eight hundred and seven years; and he begot sons and daughters.
All the days that Seth lived were nine hundred and twelve years; and he died. It is unknown if all the sons listed by name in this genealogical record were specifically firstborn offspring. It is possible that the Torah mentions only the first son by name, as his birth divides the father’s life into two periods, before becoming a father and after. There may be other reasons why each son is mentioned by name. In any case, the family line continues through each of these sons until the birth of Noah.
Enosh lived ninety years, and he begot Kenan. This name, like Cain’s, relates to ownership and acquisition [ kinyan ].
Enosh lived after he begot Kenan eight hundred and fifteen years; and he begot sons and daughters.
All the days of Enosh were nine hundred and five years; and he died.
Kenan lived seventy years, and he begot Mahalalel.
Kenan lived after he begot Mahalalel eight hundred and forty years; and he begot sons and daughters.
All the days of Kenan were nine hundred and ten years; and he died.
Mahalalel lived sixty-five years, and he begot Yered.
Mahalalel lived after he begot Yered eight hundred and thirty years; and he begot sons and daughters.
All the days of Mahalalel were eight hundred and ninety-five years; and he died.
Yered lived one hundred and sixty-two years, and he begot Hanokh.
Yered lived after he begot Hanokh eight hundred years; and he begot sons and daughters.
All the days of Yered were nine hundred and sixty-two years; and he died.
Hanokh lived sixty-five years, and he begot Methuselah.
Hanokh walked with God after he begot Methuselah three hundred years; and he begot sons and daughters. The concept of walking with God appears throughout the Bible, and denotes a close relationship with God. Hanokh was close to God and was occupied with His worship. Hanokh was possibly a prophet or an exceedingly righteous man.
All the days of Hanokh were three hundred and sixty-five years, far fewer than those of his father or his son.
Hanokh walked with God and he was not, for God took him. Hanokh was an exceptional and mysterious figure. It is possible that God took him up to Heaven alive just as He took the prophet Elijah. Indeed, various sources state that to this day, Hanokh remains in Heaven, as a kind of angel, similar to Elijah. Perhaps God brought him into His court because he did not belong in this world.
Methuselah lived one hundred and eighty-seven years, and he begot Lemekh.
Methuselah lived after he begot Lemekh seven hundred and eighty-two years; and he begot sons and daughters.
All the days of Methuselah were nine hundred and sixty-nine years; and he died. Methuselah is the oldest person recorded in the Bible.
Lemekh lived one hundred and eighty-two years, and he begot a son.
He called his name Noah, saying: This shall relieve us from the suffering of our work and from the misery of our hands, from the ground, which the Lord has cursed. Noah received this name because already from birth he was recognized as special. The commentaries and midrashim discuss what might have made Noah so unique. Noah was named after a prophecy, or after the hope, or as a prayer, that there would be relief from the toil and suffering. Indeed, the events of his life proved that Noah was the hope of humanity. Nevertheless, he did not provide relief for all of humanity, as only Noah and his family were spared during the flood. He did not bring salvation to the rest of mankind.
Lemekh lived after he begot Noah five hundred and ninety-five years; and he begot sons and daughters.
All the days of Lemekh were seven hundred and seventy-seven years; and he died.
Noah was five hundred years old; and Noah begot Shem, Ham, and Yefet. The Sages debate whether this listing reflects the order of their births. The verse marks the conclusion of the book of the descendants of Adam, which contains the names of representatives of the ten generations from Adam to Noah, but it provides almost no information about them. This “book of the legacy of Adam” concludes in a generation that underwent a great transformation. For this reason, the Torah goes into detail with regard to Noah and notes that already at his birth he was made a locus for humanity’s hope, by a prophecy that through him the world would be rectified. A new world would indeed begin with him, albeit in an unexpected manner.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 06
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 06 somebodyIt was, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born to them;
the sons of the great ones [ benei ha’elohim ] saw that the daughters of man were fair. Some explain that with the proliferation of the human race came the development of a social hierarchy. The term benei ha’elohim refers to members of an upper class that grew apart from the rest of humanity. According to this understanding, the daughters of man were women of the lower classes. According to another interpretation, the sons of God were angels who arrived in this world and were granted human bodies and qualities as a kind of test, which they failed. Although they ceased to be angels, they still retained their supernatural powers alongside their human urges. According to this opinion, the daughters of man refers to mortal women. And they took for themselves wives, from whomever they chose, whether young or old, single or married, without consideration for laws of any kind.
Society turned a blind eye to lawlessness. No one interfered with or objected to the breaching of boundaries. Therefore, the Lord said: My spirit shall not abide in man forever. According to many commentaries, the verse means: My spirit shall not fight and complain about man forever, for he too is flesh. Man has repeatedly failed to actualize his superiority over other creatures; therefore, he too is only flesh. And his days shall be one hundred and twenty years. I will grant mankind an extension of 120 years before sealing its fate. If man does not change, humanity will cease to exist in its current form.
The verse notes: The giants [ nefilim ] were on the earth in those days, and also thereafter. It is possible that they were called nefilim because they fell [ nafelu ] from their position of greatness, or because they were more wondrous [ nifla ] than the rest of humanity. The nefilim are mentioned much later as well, some as mythical creatures, others as actual people, perhaps remnants of the primeval giants mentioned in this verse. The nefilim were born when the sons of the great ones consorted with the daughters of man, and they bore them children. Although the nefilim were not themselves “sons of the great ones” in either sense mentioned above, as their children they were nonetheless great and powerful. Although few in number, the nefilim ruled over many places in the world. For example, Og, king of Bashan, was described as one of the last surviving descendants of these giants. He was killed by the children of Israel in his kingdom, the Bashan, in the present-day Golan Heights. They were the mighty who were from ancient times, the men of renown, those who made a name for themselves and were remembered by later generations. When people spoke of the mighty men of yore, they were referring to these nefilim .
The Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil all the time. One’s inclinations are not necessarily evil; they are the proactive and creative force within man, which can lead him in various directions. Indeed, the Sages speak of a good inclination. The verse, however, refers to an inclination that is completely evil. That is, man chose to utilize his inclination exclusively for evil.
The Lord regretted, as it were, that He had made man on the earth. The hopes placed upon man, who was granted free will, were dashed. And He was saddened in His heart. The verse employs anthropomorphic expressions toward God, meant to convey that the creation of man was a failure. Some explain the verse as follows: The Lord considered and decided with regard to the man that He had made on the earth, and He brought sadness to the heart of man.
The Lord said: I will obliterate man whom I have created from the face of the earth; from man to animal, to crawling creatures, to birds of the heavens; for I regret that I made them. Man is not simply the pinnacle of creation, but the very purpose of it. Only man can direct the many objects and creatures of the world to their collective purpose. Consequently, in his absence, all of creation loses its reason for being. The Sages teach a parable to illustrate this idea: A man fashioned a wedding canopy for his son and prepared many types of food for the wedding feast. Sometime later, before the wedding, his son died. The father then dismantled the canopy, saying: I fashioned all this only for my son. Now that he is dead, why do I need a wedding canopy? Similarly, the Holy One, blessed be He, said: I created all the animals only for man. Now that man sins, why do I need these creatures?
But from the entire human race, only Noah found favor in the eyes of the Lord. After being disappointed by the rest of Adam’s descendants, God chose Noah as the father of the new humanity, due to his special qualities.
This is the legacy of Noah, the story of his life in brief. Noah was a righteous, wholehearted man in his generations; in contrast to those surrounding him, Noah walked with God. Noah was connected to God, as he contemplated Him and lived with an awareness of the Divine. During this period, when mankind had not yet received God’s commandments, one’s relationship with God was not expressed in mandated actions. It is stated about Noah, as well as Hanokh before him and Abraham after him, that they walked with or before God (5:22, 17:1). This means that God was the subject of their lives, and they had a special relationship with Him.
Noah begot three sons: Shem, Ham, and Yefet.
After a brief description of Noah as a private individual, the focus returns to the history of the world and Noah’s important role in the unfolding events. The earth was corrupted before God, and the earth was filled with villainy. The absence of law and order, described above in relation to men taking women as they chose (verse 2), was not limited to the sexual sphere. This corruption also found expression in the manner in which the powerful exerted control over the weak, as people began to steal and snatch property from one another without compunction. As a result, the very possibility of possession and ownership was eliminated.
God saw the earth, and behold, it was corrupted, as all flesh corrupted its path upon the earth. People’s lives in the environment of the time were apparently quiet and comfortable, with abundant food and water. 1 However, instead of being happy with their lot, the people exploited the abundance that was in easy reach by stealing from one another and refusing to recognize property laws and social conventions. Limits and boundaries did not exist for them.
God said to Noah: The end of all flesh has come before Me. According to My reckoning, the end of all living creatures has arrived, as the earth is filled with villainy because of them; and behold, I will destroy them with the earth. I will destroy them together with the earth itself. However, you have been chosen to continue humanity.
Therefore, make for you an ark of the relatively light gopher wood; separate compartments shall you make the ark, and you shall coat it within and without with pitch, a kind of tar from which asphalt is produced. The tar will serve as a waterproofing substance.
And this is how you shall make it: Three hundred cubits shall be the length of the ark, fifty cubits its breadth, and thirty cubits its height. This is a huge structure, of exceptional proportions even in comparison to structures built on land.
You shall make a window for the ark, to allow the entrance of light. And to a cubit shall you complete it at the top; the sides of the ark shall form a kind of trapezoid, with the roof of the ark one cubit long. And the entrance of the ark you shall place in its side, for entering and exiting. Lower, second, and third stories you shall make it; the ark shall have three floors.
And behold, I am bringing the flood [ mabbul ]. The term mabbul is commonly translated as flood, based on the context. 2 However, it is likely that the word actually means “judgment” or “sentence.” 3 In other words, God is bringing a sentence of judgment in the form of water upon the earth to destroy all flesh in which there is the breath of life, from under the heavens. In those waters, everything that is on the earth, everything that is generally found on dry land, shall perish.
But at this juncture I will keep My covenant with you, which will be confirmed and fulfilled at a later point (see 9:9–11). You shall come to the ark: you, and your sons, and your wife, and your sons’ wives with you.
From every living being of all flesh, two of each you shall bring to the ark to keep alive with you; they shall be male and female. You must bring into the ark the living beings that will form the basis of the future existence of both mankind and the animal kingdom.
From the birds according to their kind, and from the animals according to their kind, from every crawling creature of the ground according to its kind, two of each shall come to you. You are not commanded to hunt them; rather, I will make them come to you in pairs. 4 The aim is to keep all of the species of the world alive from them. Although you are not required to gather the animals into the ark, there is another duty which you are obligated to perform:
You, take for you from all food that is eaten. You must collect enough appropriate food for you and all the animals that will be living in the ark. And gather it to you; and it shall be for you and for them for food.
Noah did according to all that God had commanded him; so he did. It should not be inferred from the brevity of the account that this was a simple process. Various midrashim describe at length Noah’s difficulties during the years of the construction of the ark. 5 For over one hundred years Noah was occupied with building an enormous structure. 6 The ark that he built did not have a steering wheel, mast, sail, or oar. It resembled neither a ship nor a building. It was not meant to sail in any particular direction, but merely to float. It is easy to imagine the practical and social difficulties of this effort, and the halting efforts that Noah might have made to explain the purpose of his work to others.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 07
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 07 somebodyThe Lord said to Noah: Come you and your entire household into the ark, for I have seen you to be righteous before Me in this generation. Unlike the animals, who were selected at random to enter the ark, you were chosen from all humans because of your righteousness.
From every pure animal you shall take to you seven pairs, each pair composed of a male and his mate. It is commonly explained that this is referring to animals that would later be considered pure, kosher according to halakha . It is possible, however, that the distinction between pure and impure animals is an ancient one, which predates the giving of the Torah. And of the animals that are not pure, two, a male and his mate; literally, a man and his wife. Since the Torah is speaking of specific pairs of animals, who are to be the sole survivors of that species, it refers to the male and female animal with the unusual expression of a man and his wife.
Also from the birds of the heavens, take with you seven each, male and female, in order to keep offspring alive on the face of all the earth.
For in seven more days, I will make it rain upon the earth forty days and forty nights, and I will obliterate all existence that I made, everything that lives, from the face of the earth.
Noah did according to all that the Lord had commanded him. Although Noah had not yet seen any actual flooding, he still entered the ark in obedience with God’s command, as he believed His word.
Noah was six hundred years old at that time, and the flood, or sentence of judgment, was water upon the earth.
Noah, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons’ wives with him, came into the ark, because of the water of the flood.
From the pure animal, and from the animal that is not pure, and from the birds, and from every creature that crawls upon the ground,
two at a time they came by themselves to Noah into the ark, male and female, as God had commanded Noah. In the case of most species they came in pairs, while from certain species there were sets of seven pairs. It is these animals that survived in the ark.
It was after the passage of seven days that the water of the flood was upon the earth. The water began to cover the earth.
In the six hundredth year of the life of Noah, during the second month: It is possible that this is referring to the second month after Noah’s birthday. However, the Sages maintain that it means the second month of the calendar year, which follows the Creation of the world. They disagree whether this is the month of Iyar, which is second after Nisan, or Marĥeshvan, which follows Tishrei. 7 On the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the wellsprings of the great depth, which ordinarily flow slowly and in moderation, were breached, and the windows of the heavens were opened. This was not a sprinkle, as water gushed out and inundated the land.
The rain was upon the earth for forty consecutive days and forty nights.
On that very day, Noah, and Shem, and Ham, and Yefet, the sons of Noah, and Noah’s wife, and the three wives of his sons with them, entered into the ark;
they, and every beast according to its kind, and every animal according to its kind, and every crawling creature that crawls upon the earth according to its kind, and every flying thing according to its kind , every bird, every winged creature, even winged insects. 8
They came to Noah to the ark, two each from all flesh in which there is the breath of life.
And they that came, male and female from all flesh came, as God had commanded him; and the Lord shut it for him. Due to the unparalleled intensity of the waters of the flood, which came from above and below, God’s own special closing of the ark, as it were, was required to prevent water from penetrating inside.
The flood was forty days upon the earth; and the water increased, and lifted the ark, and it was raised above the earth. After forty days of incessant flooding, the ark, which was undoubtedly very heavy, began to rise above the earth.
The water accumulated and increased greatly upon the earth, and the ark went upon the face of the water. The ark began to float. Since it was not a ship and there was no way to direct it, the ark simply drifted along, drawn by the flow and movement of the water.
The water accumulated exceedingly upon the earth, and all the high mountains under the entire heavens were covered.
Fifteen cubits upward the water accumulated, and the mountains were covered.
All flesh that crawls upon the earth, of the birds, and of the animals, and of the beasts, and of all the swarming creatures that swarm upon the earth, and all mankind, perished.
All in whose nostrils was the breath of the spirit of life, from all that was on the dry land, died. All creatures living in dry places passed away. 9 The force of the water, its quantity, and according to the Sages, even its heat, 10 destroyed all the living creatures. Presumably the animals that could swim tried to do so, but they could not withstand the overpowering water. The people certainly tried to find a hiding place or grab onto planks to stay afloat, but all such material was washed away.
He obliterated all existence that was upon the face of the earth, from man, to animal, to crawling creature, to birds of the heavens; they were obliterated from the earth. Only Noah remained and they that were with him in the ark.
The water accumulated upon the earth one hundred and fifty days. Over the course of these one hundred and fifty days, perhaps the rain continued to fall, and the wellsprings did not stop up, but the force of the water weakened. During this period, everything flowed and intermingled: The oceans surged past the coastline and the seas broke their boundaries. For almost half a year, there was nothing in the world except for water and the ark floating somewhere upon it. Its occupants did not know where they were, and possibly they could not even know how much time had elapsed since they had shut themselves in the ark, as time calculations in those days depended on the celestial bodies. It is doubtful whether they could even distinguish between day and night. 11
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 08
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 08 somebodyGod remembered Noah and all the beasts and all the animals that were with him in the ark; God caused a wind to pass over the earth, and the water subsided. The water rested from its rage and did not descend anymore in the form of rain nor surge from the depths.
The wellsprings of the depth and the windows of the heavens were dammed, closed, and the rain from the heavens was terminated.
The water receded from upon the earth gradually. The water that had swelled and risen above the mountains descended into the valleys, from where it flowed into the sea. These processes took time, as the entire world was inundated with water. And the water was diminished at the end of one hundred and fifty days. After one hundred and fifty days of flooding, the water began to diminish.
The ark rested during the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, at the conclusion of one hundred and fifty days starting from the second month, upon the mountains of Ararat. The water level receded until the ark rested once again on the earth, although not in the place where Noah had built it. The ark was presumably constructed in a then-inhabited area, in or around modern-day Iraq, and it drifted a considerable distance to the high mountains of Ararat, which are likely close to the mountains called by that name today. 12
And the water gradually receded until the tenth month; during the tenth month, on the first of the month, the peaks of the mountains were revealed and seen. Since the ark was exceedingly heavy and deeply immersed in the water, it took additional time from when it rested on the peak until the mountains themselves were exposed.
It was at the end of forty days from the time that the tops of the mountains could first be seen. Only after the mountaintops became visible could it be known with certainty that the water was gradually receding. Noah opened the window of the ark that he made.
He sent the raven. Noah chose to send a raven, on the assumption that a bird which feeds on carrion would be the first to find itself something to eat. Were it to find food, Noah would know that the water level had diminished. 13 And it went to and fro, without bringing back any sign, until the drying of the water from upon the earth.
He sent the dove from him, as this bird is also capable of flying long distances, to see if the waters had abated from upon the surface of the ground.
But the dove did not find rest for its foot, and it returned to him to the ark, as water was on the face of the entire earth; and he extended his hand and took it, and brought it to him to the ark.
He waited yet another seven days and again sent the dove from the ark.
The dove came in to him at evening time, after it had been sent off in the morning, and behold, it had plucked 14 an olive leaf in its mouth. Since olive leaves are relatively tough, they did not rot in the water. And Noah knew that the waters had abated [ kallu ], that they had become light [ kal ] and diminished from upon the earth.
He waited yet another seven days and sent the dove, and it did not return again to him anymore, as it found rest in one of the spots that had dried up in the meantime.
It was in the six hundred and first year, during the first month on the first of the month; the water dried from upon the earth, those areas that had been dry land prior to the flood. Noah removed the cover of the ark, as apparently the window was very small and he was able to see out only after removing the cover; and he saw, and behold, the surface of the ground dried. The water had disappeared, but the ground was still sodden.
During the second month, on the twenty-seventh day of the month, the earth dried. It took a long time until the ground fully dried up, to the extent that it was possible to tread upon it.
Nevertheless, Noah remained in the ark. Just as he did not enter the ark of his own initiative, so too, now he waited for a divine command to exit it. 15 And indeed, God spoke to Noah, saying:
Go out of the ark: You, and your wife, and your sons, and your sons’ wives with you.
Every living being that is with you from all flesh, of the birds, and of the animals, and of every crawling creature that crawls on the earth, bring out with you. Remove them forcibly, as the animals had become accustomed to life in the ark. Although they were confined there, they had easy access to food. Moreover, some of them may have been in a state of hibernation due to the conditions. It was therefore necessary to compel them to leave. And they will teem [ veshartzu ] on the earth, by increasing greatly in number so that they will be found everywhere, like creeping animals [ sheratzim ], 16 and be fruitful and multiply upon the earth. In this manner the world will be populated afresh.
Noah emerged, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons’ wives with him.
Every beast, every crawling creature and every bird, every creature that crawls on the earth, after their families, emerged from the ark.
Noah built an altar to the Lord, and he took from every pure animal and from every pure bird, and sacrificed burnt offerings on the altar.
The Lord smelled the pleasing aroma. This is a symbolic expression, which appears elsewhere in connection with offerings. Its plain meaning is satisfaction. And the Lord said in His heart, an anthropomorphic expression denoting divine contemplation: I will not continue to curse the ground anymore on account of man, as I did with the flood, as the inclination of man’s heart is evil from his youth [ mine’urav ]. he Sages expound: From when he stirs himself [ ninar ] and emerges into the world, from birth. 17 Man is not by nature evil. But he is given freedom to choose and is subject to constant temptation. And therefore I will not continue to smite every living being anymore, as I did. In order to repair the corruption of the evil inclination, mankind requires a fixed and stable world. Therefore, human history will know no more all-encompassing, catastrophic events like the flood, but rather there will be relatively moderate rises and falls.
As long as the earth endures, planting and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease. During the flood, the seasons of the year and the alternation between day and night came to a stop. Afterward, God reestablished regular time and its units, and determined that they shall not cease again. The world will follow its natural path, the human race will survive, and never again will there be a total flood.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 09
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 09 somebodyTo establish the above promise, God turns to Noah and his family with blessings and commandments. In rabbinic and later literature these are called the seven Noahide mitzvot. God blessed Noah and his sons, and He said to them: Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth. This blessing had already been given to Adam, but it seems that God canceled it with the flood. Therefore, this blessing is granted here once again.
Fear of you and dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, upon every bird of the heavens, upon all that crawls on the ground, and upon all fish of the sea. Into your hand they are all given. Before the flood, relations between man and the animals were mostly peaceful. Although man had been given dominion over the animal world (1:28), and some engaged in animal husbandry, people were prohibited to exploit animals for food, and apparently they refrained from causing them any harm. Here God casts dread of man upon all other living creatures.
And in addition, every crawling creature that lives shall be yours for food; from now on you are permitted to eat animals. Like green vegetation I have given you everything; until now both you and animals were vegetarians, 18 whereas now you are given permission to eat everything in the world.
After God has granted permission to eat animal flesh, He now places limits on this allowance. But flesh with its life, its blood, you shall not eat. One may not eat the flesh of an animal when it is still connected to its soul. This is the prohibition against eating a limb cut from a living animal. 19 Although man is permitted to eat animals, this does not give him the right to act in a cruel manner.
This verse states another limitation: But I will demand your blood of your lives, as your right to kill other creatures does not extend to people. Human beings cannot be compared to other living things. If someone’s blood is spilled, the responsibility is upon the person who spilled it. And similarly, from every beast I will demand it. Animals are held responsible for shedding human blood just as people are. When the Torah will be given, it will include a halakha that the court must sentence and put to death an ox or any other animal that kills a human being. 20 And, as stated, from man, from every man for shedding the blood of his brother , 21 will I demand the life of man.
One who sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed. This is the first appearance of the death penalty, which is imposed on a murderer. The verse provides the reason for all these commands: As He made man in the image of God. Man is not merely one of the creatures of the zoological system. Since he was created in the image of God, he must be treated with greater respect.
And you, be fruitful and multiply; teem on the earth, and multiply on it. Some of the instructions that were given to Adam are still valid. Nevertheless, new commands are stated here that are appropriate for a changed world.
God spoke to Noah, and to his sons with him, saying: You must observe these obligations that I have imposed upon you.
And I hereby establish, set up and enact, My covenant with you, and with your descendants after you;
and with every living soul that is with you, with the birds, and with the animals, and with every beast of the earth that is with you; from all that emerged from the ark. The covenant applies to every beast of the earth; it is valid with respect to all living creatures in the world. 22
And I will establish My covenant with you, which in essence is that all flesh shall not be excised again by water of the flood; there shall not be a flood anymore to destroy the earth.
God said: This is the sign of the covenant that I place between Me and you and every living soul that is with you, for eternal generations:
My rainbow I have set in the cloud, and it shall be as a sign of a covenant between Me and the earth. The rainbow shall signify the covenant between Me and the earth’s inhabitants.
It shall be when I bring a cloud over the earth, and the rainbow will be seen in the cloud,
I will remember My covenant that is between Me and you and every living soul of all flesh, and the water shall not become a flood anymore to destroy all flesh.
The rainbow shall be in the cloud, and I will see it, to remember the eternal covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth.
God said to Noah: This is the sign of the covenant that I have established between Me and all flesh that is upon the earth. The rainbow represents the covenant between God and mankind. Since it can also be viewed as a sign of God’s revelation in the world, the Sages instructed that one must treat a rainbow with proper respect, and one must take care not to gaze upon it. 23
The sons of Noah, who emerged from the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Yefet; and Ham was the father of Canaan. This additional mention of one of their children is important for the continuation of the story.
These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the whole earth was dispersed. The sons of Noah multiplied until they filled the entire world.
Noah, man of the soil, began, and he planted a vineyard. As related earlier (see 5:29), Noah was a farmer. One of his first actions after the flood was to plant a vineyard. Apparently, Noah chose a vineyard over essential grains or fruit trees necessary for his survival. This is meant as a criticism of Noah, as he decided to produce a luxury item. 24 It is possible that he planted a vineyard because he actively wanted to get drunk; after the entire world that he was familiar with had been destroyed, he sought to blur his mind in order to overcome the trauma.
He drank of the wine and became drunk. Since he was drunk and lying on the ground, his clothes, which were presumably flowing robes, fell off him, and he was exposed and left naked inside his tent.
Ham, father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father. Canaan is mentioned here due to his involvement in the affair, as maintained by the Sages. Either Ham was the one who glanced inside the tent and went off and told his brothers, or he performed even worse actions. 25 The phrase “to see nakedness” is similar to the expression “to reveal nakedness,” which appears in the Torah in halakhic contexts not in its literal sense, but as referring to forbidden sexual contact. 26 Accordingly, this might be an indication that Ham or his son Canaan performed some sexual act upon Noah. 27 It is possible that Ham merely saw Noah’s nakedness; however, rather than concealing his father’s shame, he did the opposite and humiliated him, 28 and told his two brothers outside.
Shem and Yefet took the garment, a broad cloth that would cover Noah’s entire body, and they placed it upon both their shoulders. They walked backward, so as not to disgrace their father. Furthermore, they treated him with great modesty: And they covered the nakedness of their father. They faced backward, and they did not see the nakedness of their father.
Noah awoke from his wine, and knew. Noah was not so drunk that when he woke up he had no memory of what had happened in his drunken stupor. While intoxicated, he behaved abnormally and was unaware of his actions, but once he sobered up, he was able to recall what his youngest son, Ham, or his grandson, Canaan, had done to him . 29
He, Noah, said: Cursed be Canaan and his descendants; a slave of slaves, a slave among slaves, an absolute slave in every sense, 30 shall he be to his brothers.
He said: Blessed be the Lord, God of Shem; and Canaan shall be their servant, a servant to the descendants of Shem.
May God expand [ yaft ] and enlarge the borders of the inheritance of Yefet; yaft is an alliterative play on words. And He, God, shall dwell in the tents of Shem; indeed, the Divine Presence rested upon the seed of Abraham, a descendant of Shem. And Canaan shall be their servant, s Canaan shall remain the servant of both Shem and Yefet.
Noah lived after the flood three hundred and fifty years.
All the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years; and he died. Noah passed away without fathering any more children, perhaps as a result of what Canaan had done to him. The entire future course of history will unfold from Noah’s three sons, who were together with him in the ark.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 10
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 10 somebodyThis is the legacy of the sons of Noah: Shem, Ham, and Yefet; sons were born to them after the flood. It stands to reason that they had children beforehand as well, but the majority of their sons were born after the flood.
The sons of Yefet were Gomer, Magog, Madai, Yavan, Tuval, Meshekh, and Tiras. One can do no more than speculate about these names and the ones listed below. For example, the identification of Magog is unclear, despite the fact that he is also mentioned elsewhere: “Direct your attention to Gog, of the land of Magog.” 31 In some cases, the name of the father of a nation is preserved in the name of its country. For example, the locations of Madai, or Medea, and Yavan, Greece, are known. In contrast, Tuval, Meshekh, and Tiras have not been identified. It has been suggested that Tiras is Persia. 32
The sons of Gomer were Ashkenaz, Rifat, and Togarma. In later generations, Ashkenaz was identified, linguistically, with Germany, and Togarma with Turkey, but here too there is no certainty.
And the sons of Yavan were Elisha, which is reminiscent of the ancient name of Greece, Hellas; Tarshish, which should perhaps be identified with Tartessos, a city and state on the southern coast of the Iberian Peninsula; 33 Kitim, who were possibly succeeded by the Romans; 34 and Dodanim.
From these the island nations were divided into their lands, each after its language, after its families, in their nations. These are all nations that developed from the descendants of Yefet. These peoples apparently spoke different languages, as there was no territorial continuity between them. They spread over various islands and multiplied there, with each nation going to a different place, as the entire earth was open before them.
The sons of Ham were Kush, Mitzrayim, Put, and Canaan.
The sons of Kush were Seva, Havila, Savta, Raama, and Savtekha; and the sons of Raama were Sheva and Dedan. These are apparently all places in eastern Africa.
Among his other children, Kush begot Nimrod. Since he was such an extraordinary figure, Nimrod is mentioned by himself, not in connection with any particular nation. He began to be a mighty one on the earth. Nimrod was a king who left his mark on the memory of future generations. Several rabbinic legends identify him with Amrafel and other characters. 35 However, the biblical text itself provides comparatively little detail about his life.
He was a mighty hunter before the Lord; Nimrod was considered a hero not only in his immediate surroundings, but also on a global scale. 36 Therefore it is said over the course of the generations, as a kind of popular folk saying: Like Nimrod, a mighty hunter before the Lord. When people speak of an outstanding hunter, a great hero, or a mighty king, they compare him to Nimrod.
The beginning of his kingdom was Babel, Erekh, Akad, and Kalne, in the land of Shinar. These are cities and regions in Mesopotamia.
From that land around Mesopotamia Ashur emerged. Ashur is mentioned below as one of the sons of Shem. This verse might mean that Ashur withdrew from the tyrannous domain of Nimrod, the mighty hunter who descended from Ham, and went to build and develop cities. 37 According to another explanation, it was Nimrod who went out to Ashur, 38 and he built Nineveh, the largest city in the history of Ashur, the city of Rehovot, Kalah,
and Resen between Nineveh and Kalah; that is the great city. Although one could infer otherwise from the verse, the great city is not Kalah but Nineveh, as indicated in other places. 39 These cities were built by the Assyrians. Apparently Ashur went out toward the east, in the direction of the Tigris River, to the region of the future Assyrian empire.
Mitzrayim begot Ludim, Anamim, Lehavim, Naftuhim,
Patrusim, whose connection to Egypt can also be inferred from the Prophets, 40 and Kasluhim, from which the Philistines emerged, and Kaftorim. Although the Philistines settled in Canaan, they were actually a foreign nation that arrived from overseas. They were part of the group of nations that scholars refer to as the Sea Peoples. Apparently, they came from the area of the Aegean Sea to the coast of the Mediterranean Sea, as far as Egypt. Kaftor is probably the island of Crete, which the ancient Egyptians called Keftiu.
Canaan begot Sidon his firstborn, and Het, ho fathered one of the tribes living in the Land of Canaan when the people of Israel arrived there;
and the Yevusite, the Emorite, the Girgashite, also Canaanite tribes,
and the Hivite, the Arkite, the Sinite,
the Arvadite, the Tzemarite, and the Hamatite, six Phoenician-Syrian city-states. And then the families of the Canaanite dispersed.
The border of the Canaanite was from Sidon in the north, as you come on the way leading toward Gerar in the south, until Gaza; as you come toward Sodom and Gomorrah and Adma and Tzevoyim, until Lasha. The descendants of Ham populated a considerable part of the world in several different regions.
These are the sons of Ham, after their families, after their tongues, in their lands, in their nations.
And to Shem, father of all the children of Ever, brother of Yefet, the eldest, children were also born. The verse is ambiguous, as it is unclear whether Shem is the older brother of Yefet, or vice versa. 41 Contrary to the usual order in which the sons of Noah are presented: Shem, Ham, and Yefet, here the order is Yefet, Ham, and Shem. The reason is possibly because the book of Genesis and the rest of the Torah will focus on the descendants of Shem. Therefore, although Shem might not have been the youngest of Noah’s children, his family is presented last in order to connect it to the continuation of the story. 42
The sons of Shem were Elam; Ashur; Arpakhshad, whom some consider the father of the Chaldeans, the Babylonians; and Lud. This name is related to Lydia, a region in Asia Minor, not the Ludim, mentioned above among the children of Mitzrayim. And the last son of Shem is Aram.
The sons of Aram were Utz, who appears in the book of Job and elsewhere, 43 Hul, Geter, and Mash.
And Arpakhshad begot Shela; and Shela begot Ever. This is the family line most significant for the continuation of the story from the children of Shem.
And to Ever were born two sons; the name of the one was Peleg, as in his days the earth was divided [ niflega ], as will be explained at length in the next section; and the name of his brother was Yoktan.
Yoktan begot Almodad, Shelef, Hatzarmavet, Yerah,
Hadoram, Uzal, Dikla,
Oval, Avimael, Sheva, also mentioned in other places in the Bible, 44
Ofir, Havila, and Yovav; all these were sons of Yoktan.
Their dwelling was from Mesha, as you come toward Sefar, the mountain of the east. These tribes settled in the southern part of the Arabian Peninsula.
These are the sons of Shem, as they gradually spread: After their families, clans and tribes; after their tongues, as each family developed a language of its own; in their lands, since afterward they spread out over a geographical expanse; and after their nations, for each became a nation in its own right.
These are the families of the sons of Noah, in their legacy, in their nations; and from these the nations were dispersed on the earth after the flood, over the course of the generations.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 11
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 11 somebodyThe entire earth was of one language and of common words, similar discourse. People could talk to each other about any topic, as they knew each other and came from comparable backgrounds. They were all descendants of Noah. There were still no major linguistic or cultural differences that could create divisions among the peoples. All of the world’s inhabitants constituted a single unit.
It was as they traveled from some place in the east. This is not referring to all humanity, but to a certain large group of people. And they found a plain. Unlike in modern Hebrew, the word bik’a does not mean a valley, but a plain, a low, level expanse of land. 45 The plain was in the land of Shinar, which lies between the rivers of Babylonia, and is indeed a flat expanse suitable for the events described below; and they settled there.
Each man said to his counterpart: Come, let us make bricks and burn them thoroughly. In the land of Shinar there were not many stones, but there was an abundant supply of clay. Consequently, already in ancient times clay was used for building houses. The brick was for them as stone. The bricks fashioned from blocks of clay were molded into a fixed shape and burned in fire, and thereby turned into a building material that served the same function as stone. And the clay was for them as mortar for sticking the bricks together, and for covering the inner face of the walls. Since they had large amounts of the material, they could build many buildings solely out of such bricks, as was common in most areas of Europe for many years. However, they were not satisfied with the abundance of clay.
They said: Come, let us build a city for ourselves, and a tower with the tower’s top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed abroad upon the face of the entire earth. The tower will be visible from vast distances, and it will serve as our center, so that we will not become scattered throughout the world. We can travel far from the city provided that we can still see the tower and know how to return to it. This will ensure that we will not lose contact with each other.
The Lord came down to see the city, in whose construction all the people were partners, and the tower that the children of man built, not for a practical or technical purpose.
The Lord said: Behold, they are one people, and there is one language for them all. They are united like a nation, a single unit with a shared idea; and this is what they have begun to do. The unity of the people and language has urged on their ambitions. Now nothing of all that they plotted to do will be prevented from them. It is now in their power to do everything. Since the inclination of the heart of man is evil, in such a state of unity, evil is liable to develop in this society without constraints.
Therefore, come, let us descend and muddle their language there, so that one will not understand the language of his counterpart, and we will thereby disrupt their unity.
The Lord dispersed them from there upon the face of the entire earth, and they ceased to build the city. Their languages became confused, and new forms of expression were created. As a result, people could no longer live together, and therefore they became dispersed throughout the world.
Therefore, its name, the city’s name, was called Babel, because the Lord confounded [ balal ] the language of all the earth there; and from there the Lord dispersed them on the face of the entire earth. Mankind developed and settled the entire world.
This is the legacy of Shem. Shem was one hundred years old, and he begot Arpakhshad, two years after the flood.
Shem lived after he begot Arpakhshad five hundred years; and he begot sons and daughters.
Arpakhshad lived thirty-five years, and he begot Shela.
Arpakhshad lived after he begot Shela four hundred and three years; and he begot sons and daughters.
Shela lived thirty years, and he begot Ever.
Shela lived after he begot Ever four hundred and three years; and he begot sons and daughters.
Ever lived thirty-four years, and he begot Peleg.
Ever lived after he begot Peleg four hundred and thirty years; and he begot sons and daughters.
Peleg lived thirty years, and he begot Re’u.
Peleg lived after he begot Re’u two hundred and nine years; and he begot sons and daughters.
Re’u lived thirty-two years, and he begot Serug.
Re’u lived after he begot Peleg two hundred and seven years; and he begot sons and daughters.
Serug lived thirty years, and he begot Nahor.
Serug lived after he begot Nahor two hundred years; and he begot sons and daughters.
Nahor lived twenty-nine years, and he begot Terah.
Nahor lived after he begot Terah one hundred and nineteen years; and he begot sons and daughters.
Terah lived seventy years, and during those years he begot Abram, Nahor, and Haran.
This is the legacy of Terah: Terah begot Abram, Nahor, and Haran; and Haran, who was likely the youngest son, begot Lot. These characters will be important for the continuation of the story.
Haran died during the lifetime of Terah his father. It was apparently uncommon for a son to pass away during his father’s lifetime. 46 He passed away in the land of his birth, in Ur of the Chaldeans.
Abram and Nahor took wives for themselves; the name of Abram’s wife was Sarai; and the name of Nahor’s wife was Milka, daughter of his brother Haran, who was the father of Milka and the father of Yiska.
Sarai was barren. In contrast to Nahor, who together with Milka gave rise to an entire dynasty, as will be described below (22:20–24), she, Sarai, had no child.
Terah took Abram his son, and Lot, son of Haran, the son of his son, and Sarai, his daughter-in-law, the wife of his son Abram, and they departed with them from Ur of the Chaldeans to go to the land of Canaan. It is not at all clear why they left Ur of the Chaldeans, which is probably located in southern Mesopotamia, modern Iraq, to go to the land of Canaan, which was very far away. Even as the crow flies, this is a huge distance, about 1,000 km. Furthermore, between the two locations lies the Syrian Desert, which can be crossed only in large convoys and after special preparation. In order to reach Canaan, one would have to turn north and come close to the Euphrates River in northern Syria. And they came until Haran, and settled there for the time being, despite the fact that it was not in Canaan.
The days of Terah were two hundred and five years; and Terah died in Haran. It is clear from a comparison of the dates given here and below that Terah’s death at the age of 205 occurred much later than the events described in the next section. However, the Torah supplies this detail here in order to conclude the story of the descendants of Shem. From now on, the focus will be on Abram, the tenth generation from Noah. Abram, together with his descendants, is at the center of the book of Genesis.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 12
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 12 somebodyThe Lord said to Abram: Go you from your land, the geographic location where you were born; and from your birthplace, the place for which you harbor a sense of closeness and belonging; and from your father’s house, and travel to the land, currently unknown to you, that I will show you. You will be told only the general direction you must travel, and you will be informed when you reach your destination.
You embark on this journey as an individual who is merely the head of a family or tribe. Nevertheless, I assure you that in the place where you are going I will make you into a great nation and I will bless you and I will make your name great as you will be renowned, and you shall be a blessing, meaning that people will use you as a paradigm for blessings. When they bless one another, they will say: May you merit to be like Abram.
I will bless those who bless you, and he who curses you I will curse; and all the families of the earth, not only the families of your descendants or your neighbors, shall be blessed in, or through, you. From this point forward, Abram would not live his life for himself alone as a private individual; he would become a symbol and a model for all.
Abram went, as the Lord had spoken to him. He set out on his way and left most of his family, who had also initially planned to go to Canaan, behind in Haran. And Lot, the son of his brother Haran, went with him. Abram was five years and seventy years old upon his departure from Haran.
Abram took Sarai his wife, and Lot, son of his brother, and all their property that they had acquired, and the people that they had acquired in Haran; they departed to go to the land of Canaan; and they came to the land of Canaan. The Torah does not specify the route they took, but it can be assumed that they either traveled through Syria and then along the coast of the Mediterranean, or along the international road that traversed present-day Iraq and Syria to Damascus, and then turned south across the Golan Heights until they crossed over the Jordan River into the land of Canaan via one of several possible crossing points.
Abram passed through the land to the place of Shekhem, the site where the city of Shekhem would later be built, 1 until the plain [ elon ] of Moreh. And the Canaanites were then in the land. This observation, which is important for the continuation of the story, explains that the land to which Abram came was not desolate and empty of inhabitants, as were many regions at the time. Rather, it had been inhabited for many years by the Canaanite people.
The Lord appeared to Abram upon his arrival in Canaan, and said: To your descendants I will give this land. Earlier, when Abram was commanded to travel, he had been given a general blessing. At this point, God promised him a specific gift, that his descendants would inherit the land of Canaan. He built there an altar to the Lord, who had appeared to him. Abram built the first altar to God after His revelation to him. 2 The altar was to serve as a reminder that God had revealed Himself to Abram in this place.
He, Abram, then moved from there to the mountains, east of the city of Beit El, and he pitched his tent there. Beit El was to the west of his place of encampment, and Ai to the east. For many years, Abram and his family were primarily nomadic shepherds who lived in tents. It can be assumed that much of the land was uninhabited at the time, leaving large empty areas suitable for grazing. Abram found pasture for his flock between Beit El and Ai. He also built there an altar to the Lord, and proclaimed the name of the Lord.
Abram journeyed, steadily journeying to the Negev. Since he had not been told where to stop, and as he had not yet found a place where he felt sufficiently comfortable, he left Beit El and continued southward.
There was famine in the land, due to lack of rainfall, which had a negative impact upon both the produce required for human sustenance and the vegetation used for animal pasture. And therefore, Abram descended to Egypt to reside there temporarily, but not to remain there as a permanent resident; 3 as the famine was severe in the land. Egypt, which is dependent upon the Nile rather than on rainfall, was generally immune from the effects of a famine of this kind. 4
It was when he, his camp, 5 drew near to come to Egypt, that he said to Sarai his wife: Behold, I know and have become fully aware now that you are a beautiful woman, and that in addition to your external beauty you also have a strong personality and presence.
It will be, when you come with me to Egypt and the Egyptians see you, they will say: This is his wife. And then they will kill me out of desire for you, and keep you alive. Abram was concerned that he would be attacked, both due to Sarai’s beauty and charming personality, and because of his great wealth. 6
Please say to the residents of Egypt that you are my sister; so that it may be well with me for your sake; as your brother, no one will have cause to harm me. And my soul shall live because of you.
Indeed, Abram’s concern was justified, as it was upon Abram’s arrival in Egypt, the Egyptians saw the woman that she was very fair.
Pharaoh’s officers saw her, and they praised her to Pharaoh king of Egypt, informing him that there was an exceptionally beautiful woman among the visitors who had arrived from distant lands. And the woman was taken to Pharaoh’s house to be one of his wives. It seems that Sarai was not able to object, as she and Abram claimed to be siblings.
And he, Pharaoh, benefited Abram for her sake, as the brother of the woman he sought for himself. He, Abram, acquired, of his own property as well as from all the gifts he received, sheep, oxen, donkeys, slaves, maidservants, female donkeys, and camels.
But in the meantime, the Lord afflicted Pharaoh and his household, his family and those surrounding him, with great afflictions over the matter of Sarai, Abram’s wife.
Pharaoh called Abram, and he said: What is this that you have done to me? Why did you not tell me that she was your wife?
Why did you say: She is my sister? I took her for myself as my wife. Since you claimed to be her brother, I intended to take her as my wife. I acted properly; I did not rape her or take her by force. On the contrary, I treated her with full respect and wished to marry her. It is only now that I have become aware that I took your wife from you. And therefore now, here is your wife. She is too great a temptation for the men who live here. We want neither her nor the troubles and plagues she has brought upon us, so take her and go.
Pharaoh commanded men regarding him to accompany Abram. The escort was provided not merely as a mark of honor; their mission was to compel Abram to leave their place. And so they sent forth him, and his wife, and everything that was his.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 13
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 13 somebodyAbram ascended northward from Egypt, he, and his wife, and everything that was his, and Lot with him, to the Negev.
And Abram was very wealthy in livestock, in silver, and in gold. Abram was successful in his business dealings and became very wealthy over time. The significance of this detail will become apparent as the narrative progresses.
He went on his journeys from the Negev to Beit El, to the place where his tent had been initially, between Beit El and Ai. He retraced his steps along the same route he had previously taken, in order to reacquaint himself with the inhabitants of those places, or to pay his debts, as explained by the Sages. 7
He came to the place of the altar that he prepared there at first; and again Abram proclaimed there the name of the Lord. Perhaps this means that he called a public assembly, prayed, and gave speeches, with the aim of making the name of God known in the world.
Lot, who went with Abram, also had flocks, and cattle, and tents. Lot left Ur of the Chaldeans as the heir of his father, Haran. Consequently, he had property of his own. Although he traveled alongside his uncle Abram, he was not subservient to him.
And the land could not support them to live together, as their property was substantial, and they were unable to live together. Although at the time the land was relatively uninhabited with large areas available for pasture, the size of flocks that grazed near a settlement was generally in proportion with the size of the settlement. In this situation, when the tribe of nomads arrived with Abram’s large flocks and Lot’s large flocks in addition to those of the locals, there was not enough land available for all of them. However, in addition to these objective limitations, there was another significant factor preventing them from living together.
There was also a quarrel between the herdsmen of Abram’s livestock and the herdsmen of Lot’s livestock. And in this context, the verse notes that the Canaanites and the Perizites then lived in the land. Since Abram did not yet own the land, and other tribes lived there, the quarrel between his herdsmen and Lot’s was potentially dangerous, as the local inhabitants could take advantage of their dispute and attack them.
Abram said to Lot: Please, let there be no quarrel between me and you and between my herdsmen and your herdsmen; for we are brethren. When herdsmen disagree with one another, each group complains to their master, which could eventually lead to a fight between the heads of the two groups, Abram and Lot. Abram did not wish to become embroiled in a conflict with his relative.
Isn’t the whole land before you? Since Abram and Lot were not looking to settle down, but were merely seeking pasture, the entire land was available to them, without restrictions. Please, part from me, and we will head in different directions; we do not need to dwell in the same place. So choose which territory you would like: If you go to the left, I will go to the right; and if you go to the right, I will go left.
At the time, Abram and Lot were situated in the southern Judean hills. Lot raised his eyes, and from that vantage point he saw the expansive view of the valley below, the entire area south of the Jordan River, known as the plain of the Jordan, and saw that it was all watered. This plain was a large, very low area, extremely rich in water. Even nowadays there are fertile areas south of the Dead Sea, where the climate is almost tropical, but before the Lord destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, the climate in the region was different. At that time, the entire area of what is today called the Dead Sea was one large, well-watered vale. Because of the heat and water, it was like the garden of the Lord, like the land of Egypt, an area rich in vegetation that does not receive its water from rain but from rivers and irrigation canals. This description applied to the entire plain as, until, you come to the small town of Tzoar.
Lot accepted Abram’s suggestion and chose for himself all the plain of the Jordan, a lush, fertile area large enough for his flocks and herds. Lot journeyed from the east of the place where he and Abram were situated, the side that faced the Dead Sea. 8 And they parted one from another, each following a different path.
Abram lived in the land of Canaan, and Lot lived in, among, and between, the cities of the plain of Jordan, and Lot pitched his tent as far as Sodom. At this stage Lot was not yet a resident of Sodom, but a tent-dwelling shepherd who lived near the city and under its patronage.
At this point, the text notes the moral qualities of the inhabitants of Sodom, among whom Lot had chosen to live: And even at that time the men of Sodom were known to be extremely wicked and sinful to the Lord.
The Lord said to Abram, after Lot parted from him: Raise now your eyes, and look from the place where you are, northward, southward, eastward, and westward;
for all the land that you see, I will give to you, and to your descendants forever.
I will render your descendants numerous like the dust of the earth; so that only if a man could count the dust of the earth, so your descendants shall be counted.
So therefore, arise, walk in the land to its length and to its breadth, as to you I will give it. Even though the land is currently inhabited by others and is not yet in your possession, you can feel as comfortable in it as a landowner strolling through his estate.
Abram did not remain between Beit El and Ai, but he also did not continue wandering. Rather, he turned southward and decided to encamp. He pitched his tent, and came and settled in the plains [ elonei ] of Mamre, which are in Hebron. And he built there an altar to the Lord. While on the move seeking pasture for his flock, Abram spread his faith by constructing altars and publicizing the name of God.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 14
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 14 somebodyIt was in the days of Amrafel king of Shinar, a large kingdom in the area of Babylonia; 9 Ariokh king of Elasar, probably a region northeast of Babylonia; Kedorlaomer king of Elam, also northeast of Babylonia; and Tidal king of Goyim. It is possible that this title means that Tidal reigned over a conglomeration of different tribes or nations [ goyim ], a phenomenon known even in ancient times.
They, those kings, waged war with Bera king of Sodom, and with Birsha king of Gomorrah, Shinab king of Adma, and Shemever king of Tzevoyim, and the king of Bela, which is the same city that was later called Tzoar.
All these, the kings of Sodom, Gomorrah, Adma, Tzevoyim and Bela, joined forces at the valley of Sidim, one of the plural forms of sadeh , meaning field, which is in the place 10 now known as the Dead Sea.
For twelve years they served Kedorlaomer, who is singled out probably because he was the strongest member of the coalition of northern kings. It can be assumed that these areas had been conquered by the kings of the north prior to Abram’s arrival in Canaan. And in the thirteenth year, they rebelled. 11 It appears that in addition to the kings of the five cities previously mentioned, the entire region revolted against these foreign rulers with their strange language and culture, who had come from afar with imperialist aspirations. Similarly, many years later, when Nebuchadnezzar took control of the Land of Israel, its various leaders came together and established alliances in order to strengthen one another against the foreign ruler and restore their independence.
And in the fourteenth year, Kedorlaomer and the kings that were with him came to suppress these rebellions, and smote the Refaim, remnants of the Anakim, in Ashterot Karnayim, northern modern-day Jordan, and the Zuzim, another name for Refaim 12 in a place called Ham, and the Eimim, yet another name for Refaim 13 in Shaveh Kiryatayim. Moving from place to place, the kings of the north waged battles against local rulers and defeated them one after the other.
And the Horites, an important nation among the early settlers of Canaan, one of whose tribes lived in their mountain Se’ir, in the land of Edom. 14 Later Esau and his family conquered the area from this tribe and intermingled with them. It seems that the army of the coalition of kings advanced from north to south along the eastern side of the Jordan River. They routed all the kings and tribes they encountered there, until Eil Paran, which is adjacent to, at the edge of, the wilderness of Sinai.
They then turned back, and came to En Mishpat, which is also called Kadesh. After defeating all the rulers on the eastern side of the Jordan River, the kings turned northward again and smote the entire field of the Amalekites, a region in Edom. Although Amalek was not yet born, his descendants would later live there, and the place is described according to its future name. And they also smote the Emorites, who lived in Hatzatzon Tamar, another name for Ein Gedi. 15 The kings of the north traveled from place to place, striking any nation or tribe that stood in their way. Their vast experience and military might undoubtedly gave them a substantial advantage over the local kings of small fiefdoms.
The king of Sodom, the king of Gomorrah, the king of Adma, the king of Tzevoyim, and the king of Bela, which is Tzoar, went out; and they waged a war with them, the kings of the north, in the valley of Sidim, which was a flat area suitable for combat.
They fought with Kedorlaomer king of Elam, and Tidal king of Goyim, and Amrafel king of Shinar, and Ariokh king of Elasar; four kings against the five. Although the local kings outnumbered the foreign ones, the actual balance of power dramatically favored the kings of the north, who represented four powerful kingdoms against the rulers of five small cities. It should be noted, however, that as was customary among mighty kings at the time, the king himself did not participate in the battle. He simply sent a spearhead force to quash the rebellion.
The valley of Sidim, albeit fertile, was full of clay pits, and the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah fled, and they fell there, into the pits; and those who remained, who had not fallen into the pits, fled to the highlands.
They, the four kings from the north, took all the property of Sodom and Gomorrah, Adma, Tzevoyim, and Tzoar. They passed through these cities without meeting any resistance and looted their property, and all their food, which they fed to their armies. And they then turned away and went northward back toward their place of origin.
They took Lot, who was the son of Abram’s brother, and his property and they went; and he lived in Sodom. Since he had not long been associated with residents of these cities, Lot apparently did not want to get involved in the war. He did not even take an interest when the kings of Elam and Shinar fought the nearby king of Sodom. Nevertheless, the soldiers of Kedorlaomer and Amrafel did not care that Lot was a nomad who had also come from the north. As he was living in the place of the rebellion and he owned property, they captured him as well and plundered his possessions.
The survivor, an unidentified individual, had fled from the battlefield and escaped the war, as always happens during military conflicts. According to the Talmud, this refugee was Og king of Bashan. 16 He came and told Abram the Hebrew; and he was dwelling on the plains of Mamre the Emorite, who was the brother of Eshkol, and the brother of Aner, and they were allies of Abram. Abram had developed close relationships with his neighbors, Mamre and his men, who ruled over Hebron or the nearby plains of Mamre. These relations included a mutual pact for protection. The support of his allies apparently strengthened Abram’s resolve.
Abram heard that his brother had been taken captive. The war itself did not interest Abram; it was the capture of Lot that spurred him into action. And he marshaled his retainers, called upon them to leave their homes and join him. At least some of these men had been born in his house and grown up in his camp. 17 The group of soldiers who answered his call amounted to a total of three hundred and eighteen. And Abram pursued the kings’ camp, which had headed north after finishing their business in Sodom, until Dan, a region in northern Canaan also called by a later name reflecting the area’s inhabitants centuries later. 18
On returning from their string of victories, during which they had vanquished the rebels, the kings encamped near Dan. This well-watered region was perfectly suited for a short stay. The kings were likely pleased by their successes and rested complacently. He, Abram, arrayed his men against them at night, he and his servants, and smote them, and pursued them until Hova. The location of Hova is unknown. The only detail the verse provides is that it is a place which is to the left, north, of Damascus.
He returned all the goods. The looted property was there for the taking, as the soldiers who fled for their lives left it behind. And also his brother Lot and his property he returned, and also the women and the people. Plundered goods and captives were part of the victors’ spoils in military campaigns of this type. The kings of the north took men for slaves, and women for all their needs. Abram released all these captives and returned to the Hebron region.
The king of Sodom, who was presumably disheveled and suffering from war wounds, went out to meet him, Abram, perhaps from one of the bitumen pits. The king of Sodom hoped to restore some of his losses through negotiations with Abram, who was now the rising power in the region, after his return from smiting Kedorlaomer and the kings who were with him, to the valley of Shaveh, which is the valley of the king.
And Malkitzedek king of Shalem, another name for Jerusalem, 19 brought out bread and wine, a customary ritual performed as a festive greeting. In this manner Malkitzedek, who was from a different region than the king of Sodom, also sought to honor Abram as a great hero after his victory over the kings of the north. And he, Malkitzedek, was not only a king, but also a priest of God, the Most High. Although he lived among the local pagans, he was one of the few who worshipped the one God, referred to as El, the Most High. El is translated here as simply God. Thus Malkitzedek, who is identified by rabbinic tradition as Shem son of Noah 20 was one of a small group of individuals who did not worship idols, and whose faith was close to that of Abram.
As a priest, he, Malkitzedek blessed him. It is possible that Abram did not wish to be blessed by the king of Sodom, but as Malkitzedek was a priest of God, Abram accepted his blessing. And he said: Blessed is Abram to God, the Most High, master of heaven and earth,
and blessed is God, the Most High, who delivered your enemies into your hand. Malkitzedek formally blessed both Abram for his character, which was blessed by God, and God for providing the victory. He gave him a tenth of everything. Abram treated the priest with respect and bestowed upon him a substantial gift, a tenth of all the property he had restored. 21
After seeing Abram’s considerable generosity in his gift to Malkitzedek, the king of Sodom said to Abram: Give me the people, and take the property for yourself. Let me have the residents of my city, Sodom, as I am responsible for them, and we will waive any claim to the plunder. You can keep any property the kings looted from us, which you rescued from them.
Abram said to the king of Sodom: I have raised my hand to the Lord, God Most High, master of heaven and earth. The raising of one’s hand or hands to the heavens is a gesture indicating an oath. 22
Surely, be it even a thread of a garment or a shoelace, I will not take of anything that is yours, so that you will not say: I made Abram rich. I do not want my wealth to be attributed to you and to the property of Sodom. Consequently, I shall return all the property to you
without regard to me, leave me out of the calculations, do not take me into account (see also 41:16). Only that which the young men have already eaten from the property we have restored, as they needed it for their sustenance on their way back from the north to Jerusalem; this property shall not be restored. And also the portion of the men who went with me, Aner, Eshkol, and Mamre, Abram’s friends and allies, who were probably not among his three hundred and eighteen soldiers. Since they joined with Abram and supported his cause, they deserved a portion of the spoils and Abram did not wish to deprive them of it. Therefore, he said: I insist that they shall take their portion. But as for me, although as the victorious commander I am rightfully entitled to the majority of the spoils, I relinquish my entire portion.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 15
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 15 somebodyAfter these matters, after Abram’s war with the great kings of the north, he may have been concerned that the powerful rulers might return to Canaan for another military campaign in order to take revenge. And so the word of the Lord came to Abram in a prophetic vision, saying: Fear not, Abram, I am a shield for you, and I will protect you from all harm. Additionally, your future reward for your deeds is very great.
Abram said: My Lord God, what will You give me? I go childless. You have promised me an exceedingly great reward, but what can I do with it when I have no children? And the steward of my house, the one in charge of all my dealings since I have no son, is Eliezer of, who comes from,23 Damascus.
Abram said: Behold, to me You have not given descendants, and a member of my household is my heir . Since I do not have a son, and my steward will inherit me, this reward has no meaning for me. Although Eliezer is indeed a faithful and decent man, he is not my child.
Behold, the word of the Lord came to him, saying: This man who is the steward of your house shall not be your heir; rather, one who shall emerge from your loins, he shall be your heir.
He took him, or instructed him to go, outside, and said: Look now toward the heavens, and count the stars, and see if you can count them. And after Abram had looked toward the heavens, He said to him: So shall be your descendants; they will be as numerous as the stars.
Although this seemed impossible to Abram, as he and his wife were elderly, he believed in the Lord; and He, God, considered it, Abram’s faith, 24 for him as righteousness, as a correct, upright, and proper act.
He said to him: I am the Lord who took you out of Ur of the Chaldeans, among other reasons, in order to give you this land to inherit it.
He said: My Lord God, how shall I know that I shall inherit it? This statement does not indicate a lack of faith in the fulfillment of God’s promise. However, the promise would come to pass only for Abram’s descendants, none of whom had yet been born, while in the present there was no practical expression of his possession of the land. Hence, Abram requested some sort of assurance or deed that would serve as a confirmation and reinforcement of the covenant.
He said to him: Take Me a triple heifer, and a triple female goat, and a triple ram, and a dove, and a young pigeon.
He took all these for him after they had each been slaughtered, divided them in the middle into approximately equal halves, and placed each half opposite the other, with a gap separating them. But the birds, the dove and young pigeon, 25 he did not divide.
The birds of prey, no specific bird, but birds of prey in general, descended onto the carcasses. These birds represent enemies who attempt to undermine the covenant. And Abram drove them away. He sought to fight these symbolic enemies and expel them. This indicates that the covenant and its fulfillment would encounter many future difficulties and threats, which must be opposed. Some explain that Abram put the pieces back to their initial state and miraculously restored them to life, as a sign of future renewal and resurrection. 26
This episode involved three stages: First came the initial prophetic vision, which Abram apparently experienced at night; this was followed by the preparations for the covenantal ritual and the descent of the birds of prey upon the carcasses, which occurred during the day. Then came the third and final stage, which is described in this verse: It was when the sun was setting; a deep sleep fell upon Abram. This was not an ordinary sleep due to tiredness, but an absolute inability to stay awake, as though an external factor put him in a trance. And behold, together with the deep sleep, a dread, a great darkness, a terrible fear devoid of specific content or meaning, fell upon him.
Here the covenant is formulated as a detailed, defined prophecy. He, God, said to Abram: Know that your descendants shall be strangers in a land that is not theirs. Indeed you will father children and will ultimately inherit the land, but your descendants shall not receive it immediately. The covenant will not be fulfilled in a smooth, straightforward manner. Beforehand, they will be foreigners and nomads like you are. However, in contrast to you, their wanderings will not be in this land that they are destined to inherit, but rather in a foreign place that is not their own. And furthermore, they shall be enslaved to them, the inhabitants of that foreign land; and they shall oppress them for four hundred years. The content of this prophecy fits the dread that Abram felt, but straightaway, God encouraged him with a promise:
And also that nation that they shall serve, I will judge. Your descendants will suffer there for reasons of My own, but the nation that enslaves them will be punished for doing so. And afterwards, when the designated hour arrives, they, your children, will emerge with great property.
But these travails will not affect you personally, and you will not be exiled or suffer, but rather, you shall go to your fathers, you will die and be united with your ancestors in peace, and you shall even be buried at a good old age; you will live a long and peaceful life.
And the fourth generation of your descendants shall return here to inherit the promised land, for the iniquity of the Emorite is not complete until then.
As stated above, the vision started when the sun began to set. It was when the sun had set, and there was extreme darkness, and behold, there was an appearance of a smoking furnace, a thick cloud of smoke, like the smoke that emerges from a furnace, 27 and a flaming torch that passed between those pieces. The smoking furnace and smoking torch represent the Divine Presence passing between the pieces, thereby completing the covenantal ritual.
As befitting a formal covenant, its content is summarized in clear terms. On that day, the Lord established a covenant with Abram, saying: To your descendants I have given this land according to its greatest and fullest scope, from the river of Egypt, a name referring to the eastern branch of the Nile, often called the ravine of Egypt, 28 which serves as the southwestern border of Canaan, until the great river, the Euphrates River, at its northeastern edge.
The promise of the inheritance of the land includes the removal of the nations currently living there: the Kenites, the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites. The identity of these peoples is unknown, but it can be assumed that they dwelled outside the standard area known as Canaan.
And the Hitites, the Perizites, Canaanite nations; and the Refaim, the Anakim, mentioned above (14:5), and on several occasions in Deuteronomy (2:11, 20–21);
the Emorites, the Canaanites, the Girgashites, and the Yevusites .
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 16
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 16 somebodyAnd Sarai, Abram’s wife, bore him no children, despite the fact that they had been married for many years. According to some traditions, Abram was twenty-five years old, or even younger, when he married Sarai. 29 And she had an Egyptian maidservant, and her name was Hagar. Hagar was apparently Sarai’s personal maidservant.
Sarai said to Abram: Please, behold, the Lord has kept me from bearing children; I cannot give birth. Please, consort with my maidservant; perhaps I shall be built and have children through her. Sarai may have felt that she was nearing the end of her years of fertility, and she hoped that this act would cause her to give birth as well. Abram heeded the voice of Sarai. He did not initiate the matter or act for his own reasons, but cooperated with his wife, and complied for her sake alone.
Sarai, Abram’s wife, took Hagar the Egyptian, her maidservant, at the conclusion of ten years of Abram’s residence in the land of Canaan. Sarai’s suggestion came after she and Abram had experienced many long journeys together. Ten years had passed since they had arrived in Canaan and they were still childless. And she gave her to Abram her husband as a wife. Hagar was apparently a full-fledged wife, not merely a maidservant or concubine. However, this change of status caused problems afterwards.
He, Abram, consorted with Hagar, and in a short time she conceived; she saw that she conceived, and her mistress was diminished in her eyes. Hagar saw her pregnancy as a sign of a new status. According to some Sages, she considered her conception an indication of moral superiority over her mistress. 30 However, the change in her attitude toward Sarai can also be explained in a different manner. According to the laws and customs of several nations in ancient times, if a woman married to a man who has more than one wife bears him a child, especially a son, she becomes the primary wife. According to this, Hagar’s pregnancy strengthened her position, and even if she did not openly disparage her mistress, her self-esteem would increase. 31
The situation was very delicate for Sarai, and her emotional response to Hagar’s pregnancy was ambivalent. Sarai said to Abram: The villainy done to me [ h · ] is on you; you have done me wrong. In this context ĥamas does not bear its usual meaning of theft or robbery, but merely indicates an illegal or improper act. Sarai said: Of my own volition, I gave my maidservant into your bosom. And then she saw that she conceived and I was diminished in her eyes. Therefore, the Lord shall judge between me and you. This was not an outright accusation that Abram had harmed her, but a demand that he stand by her side in a more conspicuous manner.
Abram said to Sarai: Behold, your maid is in your hand. Although she is pregnant with my child, I will not defend her; you can take her back as a maidservant. Apparently, Abram had not developed close ties with Hagar, or even if he had, he was willing to give her up for Sarai. Do to her that which is favorable in your eyes. So Sarai treated her harshly. The verse does not specify whether this harassment was mental or physical, if it involved reprimands, curses, the imposition of hard labor, or some other form of persecution. And she, Hagar, fled from her.
The angel of the Lord found her in the wilderness at, or next to, the spring of water on the way to Shur, in the Negev.
He said: Hagar, Sarai’s maidservant. The angel addressed her by name; he knew who she was. From where did you come, and where will you go? She said: From my mistress Sarai I flee.
The angel of the Lord said to her: Return to your mistress, and suffer under her hands. So it has been decreed upon you, and this is the best thing for you.
The angel of the Lord said to her: I will multiply your descendants; the child in your womb will grow into a great nation. And they shall not be counted due to their great number. Hagar’s child would also receive the blessing of fertility and strength granted to Abram.
The angel of the Lord said to her: Behold, as you already know, you are with child, and I am hereby informing you that you shall bear a son, not a daughter. You shall call his name Ishmael, as the Lord has heard [ shama ] your suffering.
He shall be a wild man. He will have a reputation as a wild, uncontrolled, and unsettled figure. His hand shall be against everyone and everyone’s hand against him; he will be continually involved in fights, quarrels, and wars. Perhaps the angel was alluding to the tendency of Ishmael and his descendants to choose the life of the nomad. As is typical of the nomadic existence, they would be drawn to banditry and suffer from endless conflicts. And yet, he shall dwell among all his brethren. He will achieve greatness in the eyes of his brothers and the members of his family.
Realizing that that the angel was no more than a messenger, she called, described, the name of the Lord who spoke to her as: You are the God of my vision, the God who is seen, the God who reveals Himself. It is hard to ascertain much about the character of the quiet Hagar, but as one who came from the house of Abram, she must have absorbed something of his worldview. She was therefore aware that the angel was not a god, but a mouthpiece of God. For she said: Have I seen a revelation here too, after my vision, in addition to those I saw in Abram’s house? Hagar had some prior familiarity with angels, as she had lived in a spiritual environment. She exclaimed in surprise that even here, in a distant wilderness, the God she had seen and known in her home had revealed Himself to her.
Therefore, one 32 called the cistern Be’er Lahai Roi, meaning the well [ be’er ] of the living [ ĥai ] God of my vision [ ro’i ]. Behold, this well is still known, and is mentioned several times later (24:62; 25:11); it is located between Kadesh and Bered, to the south of Canaan.
After returning home as instructed by the angel, Hagar ultimately bore to Abram a son; Abram called the name of his son, whom Hagar bore, Ishmael. It is possible that he had not heard from Hagar that this was the name recommended by the angel, and yet he selected it of his own accord, as the Lord had heard [ shama ] him and his misery as well, and had given him his firstborn son.
And Abram was eighty-six years old, when Hagar bore Ishmael to Abram.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 17
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 17 somebodyAbram was ninety-nine years old, and the Lord appeared to Abram; He said to him: I am God Almighty. According to the majority of commentaries, this name denotes God’s might and involvement in reality, as the One who destroys and rebuilds new systems in the world. 33 Walk before Me, serve Me, and be wholehearted, perfect. God had already established the Covenant between the Parts with Abram, a covenant that consisted of the eternal acquisition of the land of Canaan, and the continuation of his lineage. The covenant established here was a more personal one.
I shall establish My covenant between Me and you. This covenant was established with Abram as a private individual, and also with each of his descendants personally. And I will multiply you exceedingly.
Abram fell upon his face, in awe, due to the prophecy, and as an expression of his complete submission to whatever God was about to tell him, as the promise would no doubt include an obligation as well. And God spoke with him, saying:
I, My covenant is hereby being established with you, and you shall be the father of a multitude of nations.
This is a new status, and therefore your name shall no longer be called Abram, with its simple meaning of lofty [ ram ] father [ av ]. But rather, your name shall be Abraham; for I have made you the father of a multitude of nations. As part of the covenant, the name given to him by his parents was exchanged for a name chosen by God. The meaning of this name is far more complex, and the verse itself explains it: The father of a multitude [ av hamon ], or the lofty father of a multitude.
God promised Abraham: As the father of a multitude of nations, I will make you exceedingly fruitful, I will make you into the progenitor of various nations, and kings shall emerge from you and rule, each in his own realm.
I will establish My covenant, a private, personal connection between Me and you and your descendants after you throughout their generations for an eternal covenant, to be your God and for your descendants after you. The God and King of the universe, who created the entire universe with all of the planets and stars, now established a personal, family covenant with Abraham and his descendants. This covenant expresses a unique relationship with them, different from His relationship with the rest of humanity, other creatures, and worlds.
As part of this covenant, I will give to you and to your descendants after you the land of your residence, the entire land of Canaan, for an eternal portion. Here God repeats His earlier promise, thereby declaring that this covenant does not replace the Covenant between the Parts as a new spiritual arrangement. Rather, it exists in addition to the previous covenant. And He added an additional promise: I will be their God. From this point onward one finds the phrase, God of Abraham. 34 From now on God is not only the Creator of heaven and earth (14:19, 22), but also our God, the God of Abraham’s descendants.
God said to Abraham: And you, you shall observe My covenant; you, and your descendants after you throughout their generations, as it includes an obligation on your part as well:
This is My covenant that you shall observe, between Me and you and between your descendants after you: Circumcise every male among you.
You shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it, this cutting of the flesh, shall be a mark of a covenant between Me and you. The covenant is the relationship itself, while the circumcision serves as a concrete symbol, an indication of, and reminder about the covenant.
This verse constitutes a normative commandment that forms a binding obligation in Jewish law, similar in style to the many commandments found in the later books of the Torah: And one who is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every male throughout your generations, whether born in the house, an actual member of the family or anyone else born into the household, even if not a biological descendant of Abraham, or purchased with silver, a slave purchased from any foreigner, who is not of your descendants. Not only must Abraham’s descendants be circumcised, but all males who are his property. The covenant applies to these people from the moment of their birth, although the mark of the covenant is placed on their flesh only on the eighth day.
Circumcise those born in your house, or those purchased with your silver, and the mark of My covenant shall be in your flesh for an eternal covenant throughout the generations.
And the uncircumcised male among your descendants who shall not circumcise the flesh of his foreskin, that soul shall be excised from his people. This is the most severe of punishments; the soul is cut off and destroyed, a penalty that begins with death and continues in the world of the souls after death. 35 An individual who chooses to remain uncircumcised is deserving of such a severe punishment, since he has breached My covenant, by essentially declaring that he wants no part in it.
God said to Abraham, referring to him by his new name, by which he was to be forever known from that moment forward: Sarai your wife, you shall not call her name Sarai, as Sarah is her name.
I will bless her with various blessings, and I will also give you a son from her; I will bless her, and she too shall become nations [ goyim ]. The word goyim can also mean tribes or leaders (see 20:4, 25:23) . Kings of peoples shall be descended from her.
In the wake of these declarations, Abraham fell upon his face in submission, and he laughed. He said in his heart: Shall a child be born to one who is one hundred years old? Abraham was ninety-nine at the time. If Sarah were to become pregnant immediately, he would be one hundred years old at the time of the child’s birth. And if it is Sarah, shall a ninety-year-old woman give birth? This certainly goes against the laws of nature.
Abraham said to God: If only Ishmael shall live before You. You have promised me miracles, which go against the laws of nature. However, I already have a son, Ishmael. If only he could be considered my son and receive this blessing.
God said: But ndeed, in truth, Sarah your wife shall bear you a son, and you shall call his name Isaac. This name, which means “he will laugh,” is undoubtedly connected to Abraham’s laughter, as well as to that of Sarah, as seen below. And I will keep My covenant with him for an eternal covenant for his descendants after him. He, and not Ishmael, is the son through whom the special covenant will be preserved.
And as for your request with regard to Ishmael, I have heard you, and your wish shall not be entirely unfulfilled. Behold, I have blessed him, I will make him fruitful, and I will multiply him exceedingly; twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him too into a great nation.
But My covenant I will keep with Isaac. God stressed the difference between Abraham’s two sons. Ishmael, his first son, who was raised in his home and was undoubtedly beloved by his father, was blessed with great fertility and power. However, the unique personal connection embodied by the covenant was reserved for Isaac alone, whom Sarah shall bear to you at the designated time, on the same date, in another year.
He, God, concluded speaking with him, and God ascended from upon Abraham. By speaking to the prophet, God, as it were, descends to him, and when the prophecy concludes, He ascends back to the heights.
Abraham took Ishmael his son, and all those born in his house, and all those purchased with his silver, every male among the people of Abraham’s household, and he circumcised the flesh of their foreskin on that very day, the same day on which he had received God’s command, as God had spoken with him, in spite of his advanced age.
Abraham was ninety-nine years old when he was circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin.
And Ishmael his son was thirteen years old when he was circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin. Although significantly younger than his father, circumcision is difficult at that age as well, for a variety of reasons.
On that very day, Abraham was circumcised, and Ishmael his son.
And all the people of his household, whether born in the house or purchased with silver from a foreigner, were circumcised with him.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 18
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 18 somebodyNot long after Abraham’s circumcision, the Lord appeared to him in the plains of Mamre, and this occurred when he, Abraham, sat at the entrance of the tent as the day grew hot.
He, Abraham, lifted his eyes and saw, and behold, three men were standing before him. He had not noticed the men approaching, and he was surprised to see them suddenly so near him. He saw them and ran toward them from the entrance of the tent and prostrated himself to the earth. He did not wait for them to reach the tent before greeting them; rather, he approached them warmly and ran to welcome them, thereby showing them great respect.
He said: My Lord, please, if I have found favor in Your eyes, if You wish, please do not depart from upon your servant. Most commentaries maintain that this statement was addressed to God, who had just revealed Himself to Abraham. 1 As Abraham rushed toward the guests, he begged God to wait until he had properly welcomed them.
Abraham turned to the men and said: Please, let a little water be taken, and wash your feet, since you have come from afar, and you certainly need to rest. Washing one’s feet, whether he wore shoes or not, was one of the first steps a traveler took to relax. And recline beneath the tree, in the shade.
I will take a portion of bread, and you shall sustain your heart, meaning to satisfy your hunger, thereafter depart. I have no wish to delay you greatly; after you have rested and eaten a bit, feel free to go on your way. 2 As for this you have happened upon your servant. Since you happened to arrive here, take the opportunity to stay with me. They said courteously: Do so, but only as you have said. Give us some bread and water and let us sit under the tree, as that will be enough for us. 3
Despite his guests’ comment, Abraham acted otherwise, in his dedication and zeal. Abraham hurried to the tent to Sarah and said: Hurry and take three se’a, a significant amount, of high - quality flour, which is flour produced by the coarse grinding of wheat kernels, knead dough, and make cakes, a type of round bread.
Abraham ran to the cattle and took a bullock, tender, young, and good, and gave it to the lad standing there; he commanded the young man to slaughter the calf, skin it, and ready it for the meal. And he, the lad, hurried to prepare it.
He took butter, milk, and the bullock that he prepared and placed it before them, the visitors. In his delight at the opportunity to welcome guests, Abraham himself ran to provide for all their needs. Although his household presumably had bread stored away, he wanted fresh bread for his visitors. The baking of bread and the slaughter of cattle in honor of guests were also ceremonial acts that displayed the host’s enthusiasm and goodwill. He stood over them, by serving them, 4 beneath the tree, and they ate.
They said to him: Where is Sarah, your wife? Although these were ostensibly passersby, they could have known about Abraham. They may have asked about Sarah because it was customary for the mistress of the household to welcome important guests. He said: Behold, she is in the tent. She does not want to interfere with this ceremony.
He, the leader of the guests, said: I will return to you at this time next year, and behold, a son for Sarah, your wife. And Sarah was listening at the entrance of the tent, not far from the tree. And he was behind it. Apparently the man was standing behind the entrance of the tent, 5 facing away, and consequently did not notice that Sarah was seeing and hearing everything.
Abraham and Sarah were old, advanced in years. Abraham was ninety-nine years old, while Sarah was ninety. It had ceased to be with Sarah the manner of women, meaning that she no longer experienced a menstrual cycle.
Therefore, when Sarah, who was alone, heard this, she laughed inside herself silently, saying: After my languishing, shall I have youth? Now that I am old and my menstrual cycle has ceased, shall my body become young again? This process is irreversible, and furthermore, my lord Abraham is old.
The Lord said to Abraham. The speaker was one of the visitors. At this point it became apparent that they were actually angels, messengers of God, who appeared in human form. Angels are sometimes referred to as: The Lord. 6 Alternatively, this was the voice of God Himself, as Abraham was still before the Divine Presence when he tended to his guests. 7 According to this interpretation, when God interrupted the conversation between Abraham and the visitors, He revealed that they were His messengers. Why is it that Sarah laughed, saying: Shall I indeed bear a child, and I grew old? Her laughter indicates a lack of faith in the prophecy.
Is any matter beyond the power of the Lord? At the designated time I will return to you, at this time next year, and Sarah shall have a son. This will indeed occur, and then I will reveal Myself to you again.
Sarah denied it, saying: I did not laugh. Apparently Abraham, who had been standing close to the tent, came inside to speak with her. He reacted differently to the prophecy. Therefore, since God had told him that Sarah had laughed, he asked her why she had done so. Having laughed silently, Sarah denied that she had laughed, for she was afraid to admit to doubting the promise. Her denial demonstrates that she had indeed laughed out of ridicule, rather than joy. He, Abraham or God, 8 said: No, but you did laugh.
The exchange between Abraham and Sarah occurred while the guests were eating. Afterward, the men arose from there and looked out from the hills toward Sodom, in the Jordan Valley far below. And Abraham was walking with them to see them off, as befitting a host.
The Lord said to Himself: 9 Shall I conceal from Abraham that which I am doing?
He is dear to Me, and Abraham shall become a great and mighty nation. He will be a central figure in history, and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him. They will all consider themselves his successors.
For I love him, so that he shall command his children and his household after him, and they will observe the way of the Lord, to perform righteousness and justice; so that the Lord will bring upon Abraham that which He spoke of him. God’s purpose would be realized through Abraham, as he was chosen to be the father of the nation that would receive numerous blessings and inherit the land of Canaan. Since Canaan was promised to Abraham’s descendants, it was fitting that Abraham be informed of God’s plans for the land.
The Lord said: Because I hear the outcry of Sodom and Gomorrah, and it is great and increasing, and because their sin, evident from the cries of the oppressed individuals there, is very heavy,
I will descend now and see if they have acted in accordance with the outcry that has reached Me. The bare fact that certain people are suffering under the law does not necessarily mean that it is part of an evil regime. At times the suffering is due to problems of inefficiency, or insensitivity, rather than actual malfeasance. If the actions of Sodom are so evil that they justify the outcry, I will bring destruction upon them; and if not, I will know exactly what is happening there.
The men turned from there, after being escorted by Abraham, and went to Sodom; and Abraham was still standing before the Lord. The revelation or conversation between God and Abraham was still in progress. 10 Alternatively, this phrase has the same meaning as: The Lord was still standing before Abraham. 11
After God made His plans for Sodom known to Abraham, Abraham approached, and he said: Will You destroy even the righteous with the wicked?
Perhaps there are fifty righteous people within the city; will You even destroy, and not tolerate the place for the sake of the fifty righteous people who are within it? All populations contain different types of people. There must be some righteous individuals in Sodom.
If so, it is inconceivable for You to do a thing like this, to kill the righteous with the wicked, and that the righteous shall be given the same fate as the wicked. It is inconceivable for You; shall the Judge of all the earth not practice justice?
The Lord said: If I find in Sodom fifty righteous people within the city, I will tolerate the entire place for their sake.
Abraham attempted to bargain. He responded and said: Behold, I have presumed to speak to my Lord, and yet I am mere dust and ashes, a lowly being.
Perhaps the fifty righteous people will lack five, as there might be only forty-five righteous people in Sodom. Will You destroy the entire city for the lack of only five? He, God, said: I will not destroy it, if I find there forty-five.
He continued to speak to Him and said: Perhaps forty righteous people shall be found there. He said: I will not do it, even for the sake of the forty.
He said: Let my Lord please not be incensed, and I will speak. Perhaps thirty shall be found there. He said: I will not do it, if I find thirty there.
He said: Behold, I have presumed to speak to my Lord, perhaps twenty shall be found there. He said: I will not destroy, for the twenty.
He said: Please, let my Lord not be incensed, and I will speak only this time. Perhaps ten shall be found there. He said: I will not destroy, for the ten. en righteous people is apparently the smallest community that can save the city.
The Lord went, He ascended, as it were, when He concluded speaking to Abraham, and Abraham returned to his place, presumably worried and preoccupied by the coming events.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 19
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 19 somebodyThe two angels came to Sodom in the evening. The Sages teach that the third angel did not travel to Sodom, because his mission had been fulfilled in informing Abraham and Sarah of their forthcoming son. The two other angels had tasks to perform in Sodom. And Lot was sitting at the gate of Sodom. Sitting at the gate of a city was typically a sign of high status, as that was where the judges and town elders convened. Lot saw them and rose to meet them, and he prostrated himself with his face to the earth. Lot had either learned the attribute of hospitality from Abraham, or they had both learned it as a family tradition.
He said: Behold now my lords; please turn aside to your servant’s house, stay the night, and wash your feet, and you shall awaken early and go on your way. Lot’s proposal was less generous than that of Abraham, who had included food and drink as well. Nevertheless, Lot did offer them a place to rest. They said: No, for we will stay the night in the street.
He implored them greatly, and eventually they turned aside to him and entered his house; he prepared a feast for them, he baked unleavened bread, and they ate. He gave them food and drink as well, despite the fact that he did not initially refer to provisions.
Before they, the angels, lay down to sleep, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, surrounded the house, from young to old, all the people from every quarter. The mention of the men of Sodom evokes the earlier verse: “The men of Sodom were extremely wicked and sinful to the Lord” (13:13).
They called to Lot, and said to him: Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us, and we will be intimate with them. The residents of the city demanded that Lot bring out his guests so that they could exploit them sexually. It was not clear at this point whether their demand was based on sexual desire or to demonstrate their absolute intolerance of guests.14 The only person in Sodom who accepted guests was Lot, who was not a native of the city.
Lot went out to them, the residents of the city, to the entrance of his home, and he closed the door behind him, to prevent them from entering the house.
He said: Please, my brethren, do not do evil. He requested that they forgo their wicked demand.
Here now are my two virgin daughters who have not been intimate with a man; I will now bring them out to you, and you may do to them as is fit in your eyes. Only to these men do nothing, as for this they came under the shelter of my roof.
They said: Move aside. And they said: This one came to reside, and he sits in judgment? You are not a native of the city, but merely a sojourner who came to live here temporarily. How do you presume to pass judgment on our behavior? Now we will treat you worse than them. If you insist on protecting them, we will inflict an even worse punishment on you. It can be inferred from this statement that those surrounding the house were not motivated by sexual desire, but by a wish to inflict pain and humiliation on the guests. They implored the man, Lot, and when that attempt proved unsuccessful, they approached to break the door, which had been locked from the inside.
The men, the angels, who had the appearance of men, extended their hand and brought Lot to them, to the house, and closed the door. With their ability to perform miracles, the angels were able to spirit Lot into the house without letting the mob force its way inside.
They smote the men who were at the entrance of the house with blindness or blurred vision, from small to great, so that they, the residents, were unable to find the entrance. Consequently, the crowd ceased to pose a threat to Lot and his guests.
The angels had yet to perform the tasks for which they were sent: the destruction of Sodom and the rescue of Lot. Although Lot was not altogether righteous, he was saved due to Abraham, his uncle. The men said to Lot: Who else have you here? Do you have any family in the city? A son-in-law, and your sons, and your daughters, and everyone whom you have in the city, remove from the place.
For we are destroying this place, as their outcry, that of the oppressed and ill-treated in the city, has amassed before the Lord, and the Lord sent us to destroy it.
Lot came out, and spoke to his sons-in-law, who had betrothed his daughters. Lot told his sons-in-law, who were certainly natives of the city, what was about to happen. And he said: Arise, depart from this place, for the Lord is destroying the city. But he seemed as one who jests in the eyes of his sons-in-law. They did not believe him and ignored his warning.
About when the dawn broke, the angels urged Lot, saying: Arise; take your wife and your two daughters who are present, lest you too be destroyed in the iniquity of the city. There is nothing we can do to save the rest of your family, whom you were unable to convince to flee. The time has arrived to leave the city.
Perhaps Lot himself did not completely believe the angels’ warning. Their power to strike the residents of the city with blindness would certainly have impressed him, but he may still not not have entirely placed his confidence in them, and he may also have harbored concern about his uncertain future outside the city. Therefore, he hesitated. And the men forcefully grasped his hand, the hand of his wife, and the hand of his two daughters who were in the house. All this was performed out of the compassion of the Lord for him; although he was unworthy of being saved, it was the angels’ task to save him, even against his will. They took him out and placed him outside the city. They led him by foot to the entrance to the city or supernaturally transported him to the city’s outskirts.
It was when they took them out that he, one of the angels, said: Flee for your life; do not look behind you and do not stay in the entire plain of the Jordan, which encircled Sodom. Flee to the highlands surrounding the plain, lest you be destroyed.
Lot said to them: Please, no, my lords.
Please, behold, your servant has found favor in your eyes, and you have increased your kindness that you have done with me to save my life. But I will not be able to flee to the highlands; it is too far, the climb is exhausting and dangerous, and I am too old for such a challenging expedition. But I cannot remain on the plain either, lest the evil overtake me and I die.
Here now, this city is near to flee there, and it is small; please, I will flee there. Although it is a city with its own king (see 14:2), is it not small enough to escape destruction, and perhaps there my life will be saved?
He, the angel, said to him: Behold, not only have I taken you out of the city, but I have granted your request for this matter as well, not to overturn the city of which you spoke. I will destroy only the large cities on the plain, Sodom, Gomorrah, Adma, and Tzevoyim, but I will leave standing the city to which you referred.
Hurry and flee there, as I will not be able to do anything until your arrival there. Since an angel is only a messenger of God, he has no choice but to obey the instructions given to him. These angels had been directed to destroy the sinful cities and to save Lot. They could not strike the cities if that would put Lot in danger. The Torah notes: Therefore, because the city was small [ mitz’ar ], he called the name of the city Tzoar. This became an additional name of the city.
Lot and his family left at daybreak. A short while later, the sun rose upon the earth, and Lot came to Tzoar.
The Lord rained brimstone and fire upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah, as well as on Adma and Tzevoyim, from the Lord from the heavens.
Furthermore, He overturned those cities, the entire plain, all the inhabitants of the cities, and the vegetation of the earth. Apart from the fire and brimstone, there was a massive earthquake that overturned the entire area, until nothing remained as it had been.
His, Lot’s, wife looked behind him, despite the angel’s warning. She had been rescued due to her relationship with Lot, but she may have been a native of Sodom, and apparently still felt connected to the city. Whether out of curiosity or emotional distress, she turned to look at her city, and she became a pillar of salt. This could be meant literally or metaphorically that she froze in place and died.
Abraham arose early in the morning to the place where he stood before the Lord.
He looked over Sodom and Gomorrah, and over all the land of the plain of the Jordan, the region that is currently the Dead Sea. And he saw that behold, the smoke of the earth rose thickly and in abundance, like the smoke of a kiln. In addition to the destruction wreaked by the earthquake, the entire plain was burnt, leaving no trace of anything that had stood there.
The Torah summarizes the previous events: It was when God destroyed the cities of the plain, and God remembered Abraham. And due to Abraham’s merit, He sent Lot from the midst of the upheaval, as He overturned the cities in which Lot lived.
Lot ascended from Tzoar and lived in the hills, and his two daughters with him, because he feared to live in Tzoar. Lot had stayed in Tzoar on the first night, but he was afraid to remain there, as it was one of the cities of the plain that had originally been intended for punishment. As Lot suspected that its destruction had been merely delayed due to his presence and request, he felt anxious. Therefore, he eventually ascended into the mountains, as the angel had originally instructed him. And he lived in a cave, he and his two daughters.
Lot and his two daughters stayed alone in the cave, surrounded by total desolation. The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah presumably prevented any traveler from approaching the area. Lot’s daughters did not know that the destruction was limited to Sodom and its environs. They assumed that a global catastrophe like the flood had occurred and that they were the only survivors. As stated earlier (verse 8), both were young and unmarried. Therefore, the elder said to the younger: Our father is old; we cannot expect that he will have use of his faculties for long. And there is no man on the earth aside from him to consort with us in the way of the world. The continuation of the human race depends on us. Although we are his daughters, we must act like the family of Adam, the first man, and procreate from family members, in order to prevent the extinction of humanity.
Let us give our father wine to drink so that he will be drunk, and we will lie with him, and we will give life to offspring from our father. Lot’s daughters chose to intoxicate their father rather than plan with him, whether out of concern that he would react negatively or because they were embarrassed to discuss the idea with him.
They gave their father wine to drink that night. The wine was likely brought from Tzoar, along with the other provisions they had taken for their survival. The elder came and lay with her father, and in his drunken state, he did not know when she lay or when she arose.
It was the next day, and the elder said to the younger: Behold, I lay last night with my father. Since I have already broken the taboo, let us give him wine to drink tonight as well, and you come and lie with him; and we will give life to offspring from our father. We cannot know yet if I have become pregnant. Since we must guarantee the survival of the human race, we will improve our chances of success if you lie with him as well.
They gave their father wine to drink that night as well. The younger arose and lay with him, and he did not know when she lay or when she arose.
Lot’s two daughters conceived from their father.
The elder gave birth to a son and called his name Moav; he is the ancestor of the Moavites to this day. The name Moav can be understood to mean: From father [ me’av ].
The younger too gave birth to a son, and called his name Ben Ami, which has a similar meaning, as the word ami can denote a close familial relationship (see, e.g., 49:29). Nevertheless, this was a more subtle reference to his sordid origins than Moav. He is the ancestor of the descendants of Amon to this day.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 20
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 20 somebodyAbraham journeyed from there to the land of the south; he lived between Kadesh and Shur, in the Negev; and he resided in Gerar, one of the cities of the Philistines.
Abraham said of Sarah his wife: She is my sister. Although they arrived in a location that was smaller and less powerful than Egypt, nevertheless, Abraham adopted the same precautions he had used there. Avimelekh king of Gerar sent messengers and took Sarah, either for personal reasons or due to political and economic considerations.
Unlike in Egypt, God came to Avimelekh in a dream at night, and He said to him: Behold, you shall die, because of the woman that you have taken, and she is married to a husband.
Avimelekh had not approached her; even before God spoke to him, he had not engaged in sexual relations with Sarah. He said, either in the dream or while awake: Lord, will You kill me when I am a nation, a king, who is also righteous? Avimelekh pleaded for his life: Why must I die? I have done no wrong.
Did he, Abraham, not say to me: She is my sister? And she, Sarah, she too as much as said: He is my brother. In the innocence of my heart and in the cleanliness of my hands I did this.
God said to him in the dream: I also knew that in the innocence of your heart you did this, and I also prevented you from sinning to Me. Although you were able to take her, I kept you from sinning further. Therefore, after you took her I did not allow you to touch her.
Now, restore the man’s wife, as he is a prophet, and he shall pray for you, and you will live. The fact that Abraham is a prophet is not the reason Avimelekh must return his wife. Rather, God is saying that as Abraham is a prophet and a holy individual, his prayer has the power to ensure that Avimelekh will be spared. Therefore, the king would be advised not merely to return Sarah, but to ask Abraham to pray for him. And if you do not restore her, know that you shall die, you and all that is yours.
Avimelekh rose early in the morning, and he called all his servants and spoke all these matters in their ears; and the men were very frightened, due to the threat to their king’s life.
Avimelekh called Abraham, and said to him: What have you done to us, and what have I sinned to you, that you have brought upon me and upon my kingdom a great sin? Deeds that may not be done you have done to me. Abraham did not answer Avimelekh’s accusation, as he himself was not to blame. While Abraham had omitted some pertinent details, Avimelekh had taken Sarah without Abraham’s express permission.
When Abraham did not respond to his accusation, Avimelekh sought to determine his motive. Avimelekh said to Abraham: What did you see that you did this thing?
Abraham said: Because I said: Surely there is no fear of God in this place. Although I am unfamiliar with this area, the impression I received is that there is no fear of God. In such an environment no one heeds moral norms in the fundamental areas of murder and forbidden sexual relationships. And I thought: If I tell the truth about Sarah, they will kill me over the matter of my wife.
Also, I did not actually lie. Indeed, she is my sister, the daughter of my father, but she is not the daughter of my mother. Apparently, even then it was considered taboo to marry a maternal sister. 15 And she became my wife.
It was, when God caused me to wander from my father’s house and live as a nomad, that I said to her: This is your kindness that you shall perform for me; at every place that we shall come, say of me: He is my brother.
Avimelekh took flocks and cattle, and slaves and maidservants, and he gave them to Abraham as a gift, and he restored his wife Sarah to him.
Avimelekh said: Behold, my land is before you: Live where it is fit in your eyes. I will not hold this episode against you, and I grant you permission to stay here if you wish.
And to Sarah he said: The appearance of having left your husband’s house and stayed with another man could cause a scandal. Therefore, behold, I have given your brother Abraham sheep, cattle, slaves, and maidservants worth a large sum, a thousand pieces of silver ; 16 behold, it, the gift, is for you a covering of the eyes for all who are with you, and it will cover the eyes of all who would look at you in a disparaging manner and malign you, and for all people it is proven by the compensation that you have behaved honorably and need not be ashamed.
Abraham prayed to God, as God had predicted to Avimelekh; and God healed Avimelekh, his wife, and his maidservants, and they bore children.
The Torah explains why Avimelekh submitted so quickly to God’s command: For the Lord had obstructed all wombs of the house of Avimelekh, over the matter of Sarah, Abraham’s wife. During the time that Sarah was in Avimelekh’s house, no children were born to the household, neither to Avimelekh’s wives nor to his maidservants. Avimelekh feared that this condition would become even more serious. Once Abraham prayed for him, this affliction in Avimelekh’s household abated.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 21
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 21 somebodyThe Lord remembered [ pakad ] Sarah. The term pakad refers to remembering to fulfill a need or a lack. 17 The Lord blessed her with a pregnancy as He had said, and the Lord did to Sarah as He had spoken.
Sarah conceived, and bore Abraham a son in his old age, at the designated time that God had told him, one year after the angels had visited his tent.
Abraham called the name of his son that was born to him, whom Sarah bore to him, Isaac, as God had commanded. Isaac, whose name means: He will laugh, was born in the wake of the laughter of both Abraham (17:17) and Sarah (18:12). Moreover, his name alludes both to his character and to later events in his life. 18
Abraham circumcised his son Isaac when he was eight days old, as God had commanded him above (17:12). Isaac was the first child of Abraham to be born after God’s commandment with regard to circumcision, and was therefore the first to be circumcised on the eighth day.
Abraham was one hundred years old when his son Isaac was born to him.
Sarah said: God has made laughter for me. This is a strange and happy occurrence, prompting laughter. Everyone who hears will laugh for me. The unlikely event of this birth and the gladness it brings me will cause everyone who hears of it to share in my joy.
She said: Who would have said of Abraham that Sarah would nurse children, as has happened? I have been married to Abraham for many years without children, and now the impossible has occurred, as I bore him a son for his old age.
The child grew and was weaned. It is unclear when this occurred, as nursing sometimes continued until age three. Abraham made a great feast on the day Isaac was weaned, in accordance with the prevalent custom to celebrate a child’s weaning. 19
Sarah saw Ishmael, the son of Hagar the Egyptian, whom she, Hagar, bore to Abraham, playing.
She said to Abraham: Banish this maidservant and her son. By rights you should banish only the son, but as he is young and needs his mother, you must send her away as well. For the son of this maidservant shall not inherit with my son, with Isaac.
The matter was very grave in the eyes of Abraham, on account of his son. Abraham was more pained about banishing Ishmael than about banishing Hagar. He may also have better understood Sarah’s discomfort with Hagar’s presence than he did her objection to Ishmael.
But God said to Abraham: Let it not be grave in your eyes about the lad and about your maidservant. Significantly, God included Hagar in this statement. Everything that Sarah says to you, heed her voice. Whether or not you understand and identify with Sarah’s demand, it is My will that you should listen to her, for it is through Isaac that descendants will be accounted to you. You have a son from Sarah, and even if you have other biological children, only Isaac will be your heir and successor, and only his descendants will be attributed to you.
Also the son of the maidservant I will make a nation. He is not simply being discarded, because he is your descendant, and your merit stands in his favor. He too will be the father of a great people, although they will not be known as Abraham’s unique descendants.
Abraham rose early in the morning; he took bread and a skin of water and gave it to Hagar, placed it on her shoulder, and gave her 20 the child , and sent her away. She went and wandered in the wilderness of Beersheba. Although she may have planned on traveling to her native Egypt, in any event, she wandered in the wilderness instead of reaching any place of human habitation.
Eventually, the water in the skin Abraham had given her was finished, and she cast the child into the shade beneath one of the bushes in the desert. This description supports the opinion that Ishmael was sick, as perhaps he had fainted and was unable to walk.
She went and sat herself down at a far distance, approximately a bowshot removed. In biblical times, an arrow could be shot approximately 170 m. 21 She was at a distance from her son but presumably could still see him and hear his cries. For she said: I do not want to sit close to him, so that I will not see the death of the child. She sat at a distance, raised her voice, and wept.
God heard the voice of the lad; the angel of God called to Hagar from the heavens and said to her: What is it with you, Hagar? Fear not, as God has heard the voice of the lad as he is there. His cries and needs are heard above. In all places and whatever the circumstances, God protects Ishmael.
Rise, lift up the lad, since he is too weak to walk on his own, and hold him with your hand to support him, for I will make of him a great nation. He will not die yet, as a mighty nation will descend from him.
God opened her eyes, and she saw a well of water; she went and filled the skin with water, and gave the lad to drink. This drink revived the dehydrated Ishmael.
God was with the lad, and he grew; he lived in the wilderness and became an archer, skilled at hunting with bow and arrows.
He lived in the wilderness of Paran, and his mother took him a wife from the land of Egypt, her native land. Here, in the wilderness of Paran, the career of Ishmael began, and he ultimately became the patriarch of a great nation.
It was at that time, after Abraham had fathered a son, that Avimelekh and Pikhol, the captain of his guard, said to Abraham, saying: Although you are not the ruler of a great kingdom, we see that God is with you in all that you do. They began this political discussion by invoking God.
Now take an oath to me here by God that you shall not deceive or betray me, or my son, or my son’s son; like the kindness that I have done with you in allowing you to live within my territory and in taking a certain responsibility for your welfare, do with me personally, and also with the land in which you resided.
Abraham said: I will agree to take an oath and pledge to be trustworthy in my relations with your people and country.
On this same occasion, Abraham reprimanded Avimelekh with regard to the well of water that Avimelekh’s servants had stolen. Abraham had previously dug a well, which Avimelekh’s servants then took by force. Abraham had not complained at that point, but once he was negotiating a covenant with Avimelekh, he decided to raise the matter. Since Avimelekh had publicly declared that he had a positive relationship with Abraham and had treated him with kindness, Abraham found it appropriate to note the unresolved issues in their relationship and try to reconcile them.
Avimelekh said: I do not know who did this thing; and you also did not tell me it had happened, nor did I hear of it, other than today. I can take no responsibility for the incident. I did not send those people, and I never heard anything about this incident until now. By this statement, Avimelekh conceded that the well belonged to Abraham.
Abraham took flocks and cattle and gave them to Avimelekh as a gift and as his contribution to the feast prepared there. And the two of them established a covenant. The covenant may have been formalized by a ceremony in which the animals were cut in half. 22
Abraham placed, set aside, seven ewes of the flock he had given as a gift by themselves.
Avimelekh said to Abraham: What are these seven ewes that you have placed by themselves? If you intend to give them to me or to contribute them to the feast, why did you separate them from the rest of the flock?
He, Abraham, said: Because you shall take seven ewes from me, so that it will be for me as a testament, that I dug this well. These seven sheep will symbolize your consent that the well belongs to me, like an addendum to our covenant. By accepting them you give your assurance that your servants will not steal the well from me again.
Therefore he called that place Beersheba, because both of them took an oath there. The name evokes both the oath [ shevua ] about the well [ be’er ] and the number seven [ sheva ].
They established a covenant in Beersheba. Then Avimelekh and Pikhol, the captain of his guard, arose, and they returned to the land of the Philistines, from where they had traveled to the place of Abraham’s encampment.
He, Abraham, planted a tamarisk in Beersheba, and he proclaimed there the name of the Lord, God of the Universe. This was Abraham’s practice throughout his travels. Wherever he encamped, he would build an altar, teach the residents of that place about God, and make His name known to them.
Abraham did not return immediately to Hebron, but resided in the land of the Philistines for many days.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 22
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 22 somebodyIt was not long after these previous matters; 23 God tested Abraham. This is the first event explicitly described as a test planned by God. And God said to him: Abraham; and he said: Here I am. Abraham’s response indicates not only that he has heard God’s call but that he is ready to receive His command.
He, God, said: Take now your son, your only one, as Abraham’s other son had been banished and was not considered an heir, whom you love: Isaac. This long string of descriptions serves to underscore the monumental demand God is about to make. And go you to the land of Moriah, traditionally associated with the area of Jerusalem, and offer him up there as a burnt offering upon one of the mountains that I will tell you.
Once again, Abraham wasted no time. Since he had received the command only at night or just before, he awoke early in the morning and saddled his donkey, to carry the items he required for the journey. He took two of his young men with him, and Isaac his son; and he cleaved the wood for the burnt offering, as he could not know if he would find more wood on the way. 24 He arose, and he went, striding purposefully to the place that God told him, as he knew where it was.
Abraham started his journey in Beersheba, 25 many hours from Jerusalem, on foot. Since he and Isaac had only one donkey and were traveling together, the journey took three days. On the third day Abraham lifted up his eyes and saw the place from afar.
Abraham said to his young men: Stay here with the donkey and wait for me, and I and the lad will go there; we will prostrate ourselves, pray or sacrifice an offering, and will return to you. Abraham does not reveal his intention to sacrifice his son. Instead, he gives his attendants the impression that he and Isaac will sacrifice an offering together and then return.
Abraham took the wood of the burnt offering and placed it upon Isaac his son. By carrying the wood, Isaac was already participating in the sacrifice. He, Abraham, took in his hand the fire, the kindling, and the knife, and the two of them went together.
Now that they were alone Isaac said to Abraham his father; he said: My father. He, Abraham, said to him, as he had responded earlier to God: Here I am, my son, ready and attentive. Abraham has not become any less fatherly toward Isaac, and he listens with a loving ear, despite the knowledge that he must sacrifice him. He, Isaac, said: Here are the fire and the wood, but if our intention is to sacrifice an animal, where is the lamb for a burnt offering?
Abraham said, in a poignant response: God will Himself see to the lamb for a burnt offering, my son. At this point, Isaac surely began to ponder: What if we do not find a lamb? The juxtaposition of “burnt offering” and “my son” would have rung in his ears, as Isaac was no doubt aware of the practice of human sacrifice among the surrounding peoples. Nevertheless, the verse repeats the phrase indicating their solidarity: And the two of them went together. Earlier, Abraham was deeply troubled and Isaac was entirely innocent, and they went together. Now Isaac has heard Abraham’s frightening words, but he continues to walk with his father, without any attempt to escape.
They came to the place that God had told him; Abraham built the altar there, arranged the wood, and bound the hands and feet of Isaac his son to prevent him from moving, and he placed him on the altar upon the wood. He completed his preparation of Isaac as an offering.
Abraham raised his hand and took the knife to slaughter his son.
The angel of the Lord called to him from the heavens. Since the angel is a messenger of God, its statement is the word of God. And he said: Abraham, Abraham. Again, he, Abraham, said: Here I am, always ready to be commanded, even in the midst of such a superhuman effort as this.
He said: Do not raise your hand to the lad, and do not do anything to him; for now I know that you are God-fearing, and you did not withhold your son, your only one, from Me.
Abraham lifted his eyes and saw that behold, there was a ram after it had been caught in the thicket by its horns. Rams, even those with long horns, are typically able to avoid being caught in thickets. Furthermore, this ram was in unusually close proximity to humans. Abraham immediately understood that this was no coincidence, but a sign. 26 Therefore, Abraham went, took the ram, and offered it up as a burnt offering in place of his son.
Abraham called the name of that place where this occurred: The Lord will see, as it is said to this day with regard to that mountain: On the mount where the Lord will be seen.
The angel of the Lord called to Abraham a second time from the heavens.
He said: By Myself I have taken an oath – the utterance of the Lord – for because you have done this thing, and did not withhold your son, your only one,
for that I will bless you and multiply your descendants as the stars of the heavens and as the sand that is upon the seashore, and your descendants shall inherit the gate of their enemies;
and all the nations of the earth shall bless themselves by your descendants, meaning that they will bless each other with the prayer that they be like your descendants, since you heeded My voice.
Abraham returned to his young men, and they arose and went together to Beersheba; and Abraham lived for some years more in Beersheba.
It was after these matters that it was told to Abraham, saying: Behold, Milka, wife of Nahor, she too has borne children to your brother Nahor. This particular form of the word “after” indicates that considerable time had passed between the two events. 27 The news reached Abraham from Haran, on the border of modern-day Turkey and Syria, where Nahor and his family lived.
Nahor fathered several sons: Utz, with a traditional Aramaic name, who was his firstborn, Buz his brother, and Kemuel, father of Aram, who was apparently an important Aramean leader. Apart from Abraham, Terah’s descendants became Arameans.
Kesed, Hazo, Pildash, Yidlaf, and Betuel, Nahor’s youngest son.
Betuel begot Rebecca. He had other children as well, and the Torah later introduces his son Laban, who was older than Rebecca. Nevertheless, in this context the birth of Rebecca is of more significance, as she will marry Isaac. 28 At this point Abraham knew that there was at least one woman in the family eligible for Isaac, and he may have had Rebecca in mind when he later sent a messenger to Haran to seek a wife for his son (chap. 24). These eight sons Milka bore to Nahor, Abraham’s brother.
And his, Nahor’s, concubine, and her name was Re’uma, she too bore sons: Tevah, Gaham, Tahash, and Maakha.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 23
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 23 somebodyThe lifetime of Sarah was one hundred and twenty-seven years, the years of the life of Sarah. A literal rendition of the verse would read: The lifetime of Sarah was one hundred years and twenty years, and seven years, the years of the life of Sarah. Some commentaries explain that the repetition of “years” in the verse teaches that at each stage of her life, whether she was seven, twenty-seven, or one hundred, Sarah exhibited the same good qualities.1 The concluding phrase, “the years of the life of Sarah,” indicates that in each of those stages she lived a full and complete life.
Sarah died in Kiryat Arba, which is Hebron, in the land of Canaan; Abraham came from Beersheba, where he lived before and after the binding of Isaac, to lament Sarah, as is customary when mourning someone, and to weep and move others to weep for her.
After mourning for Sarah, her husband must find a place to bury her. Abraham arose from before his dead, and he spoke to the children of Het, their leaders and elders, who sat at the entrance to the city of Hebron, saying:
Although I am a foreigner here, my family and I have lived here for many years. And in addition, I am a resident alien with you: I do not have rights in this place, but I am an old acquaintance of yours. Therefore, give me a portion of your land that can serve as a burial portion with you, and I will bury my dead from before me.
The children of Het answered Abraham, saying to him. It is possible that they discussed the matter among themselves first, before providing him with an official response.
Hear us, my lord: Although you say that you are a foreigner and a resident alien, you are not merely an ordinary person. Rather, you are a prince of God in our midst, as your status is greater than that of the head of a small tribe. Therefore, in the choicest of our graves bury your dead; none of us shall withhold his grave from you, from burying your dead, as you may choose a burial plot in any place that you desire. The local residents thereby declared that they have given Abraham informal rights to their land.
Abraham arose, and prostrated himself, or bowed his head, 2 in a formal gesture of respect and gratitude, before the people of the land, before the children of Het.
Despite his expression of gratitude, Abraham did not wish to bury his wife in the land of the children of Het. Rather, he wanted to purchase a separate piece of property. He spoke with them, saying: If you are truly willing to fulfill my request and bury my dead from before me, heed me, and intercede for me with a specific individual, Efron son of Tzohar,
that he will give me the Cave of Makhpela, which was so called because it is a double [ kefula ] cave, that is his, which is at the edge of his field; he shall give it to me for a full price in your midst for a burial portion. Despite their offer to allow him to use any property he chose, Abraham insisted on purchasing a plot at full price, as he wanted it to be property held by the family in perpetuity. With regard to the retention of an ancestral inheritance, see, e.g., I Kings 21:1–3 and Nehemiah 2:2–5.
And Efron, who was not necessarily an important member of the city, was living at that time among the children of Het; and Efron the Hitite answered Abraham in hearing of the children of Het, of all those coming to his city gate. He too conducted himself ceremoniously, as he approached the city council and issued a public declaration, saying:
No, my lord, you offered to purchase a portion of my field, but I cannot accept that proposal. Rather, heed me: The entire field I have given to you , 3 and the cave that is in it, I have given it to you; in the eyes of my people, who are all listening to my declaration, I have given it to you and will not deter you from taking it. I will clear the land for such a distinguished man as yourself, and the entire plot will belong to you; go bury your dead.
Abraham prostrated himself a second time before the people of the land, thereby formally expressing his gratitude for Efron’s generous offer.
Despite the offer, he, Abraham, spoke to Efron in the hearing of the people of the land, saying: Rather, if only you will heed me, when you originally said: No, my lord, heed me, I indeed listened to you. Now it is my turn to request that you listen to me: I have given you, that is, I am giving you, the silver for the field in order to purchase it; please take it from me, and I will bury my dead there.
Until this point, Efron had spoken generally about the matter; now he must set a price. Therefore, Efron responded to Abraham, saying to him:
My lord, heed me. This land is worth four hundred shekels of silver, between me and you what is it? We are close friends, and consequently such a small plot of land should not concern us; and therefore bury your dead, and let us not suffer delays over the price.
Abraham heeded Efron; and Abraham weighed for Efron the silver that he spoke in the hearing of the children of Het. It is almost certain that this silver was not in the form of minted coins; it was more likely a collection of metal pieces whose value was determined by weight. Abraham surprised Efron, who expected him to suggest a much lower price, after which the negotiations would continue until the two sides agreed upon a compromise sum. However, Abraham chose to refrain from the formal method of purchase, and instead immediately paid the entire sum, which was four hundred shekels of pure, choice silver, ready currency that would be accepted by anyone in the world.
The field of Efron that was in Makhpela, the field that surrounded the Cave of Makhpela, that was before Mamre, the field and the cave that was in it, and every tree that was in the field, that was within its border all around, were established as Abraham’s property. Abraham was not satisfied in purchasing the cave alone; he also acquired the surrounding area and an access path to the cave.
All of this was transferred as a possession for Abraham in the eyes of the children of Het, of all coming to his city gate.
And thereafter, after the property was transferred to his ownership, Abraham buried Sarah his wife in 4 the cave of the field of Makhpela opposite Mamre, which is Hebron, in the land of Canaan.
The field and the cave that was in it were established as a burial portion for Abraham, for his family, which he had purchased from the children of Het.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 24
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 24 somebodyAnd Abraham was old, advanced in years. Isaac at that time was thirty-seven or thirty-eight years old; Abraham was therefore one hundred and thirty-seven or slightly older. It is possible that this introductory phrase reflects Abraham’s perception of himself. And the Lord blessed Abraham with everything, including rest and tranquility from troubles and from his nomadic travels.
Abraham said to his servant, the elder of his household. This individual was not necessarily elderly, but was the senior and most distinguished attendant, who oversaw everything that he had, the general administrator of finances in Abraham’s household. Abraham said to him: Please, place your hand under my thigh, which was an ancient manner of taking an oath. In contrast to grasping or shaking hands, which expresses a commitment between two individuals of similar social status, an oath accepted by placing one’s hand under the thigh of a seated person was typically used in the case of an agreement between an individual with a senior status and someone under his jurisdiction. By this action, the taker of the vow expresses his commitment to perform the bidding of the one administering the oath. 6
And I will administer an oath to you by the Lord, God of the heavens and the God of the earth, who is all-powerful, that you shall not take a wife for my son from the daughters of the Canaanites, in whose midst I live. Abraham did not know how many years he had left, and whether he would succeed in marrying off Isaac himself. He therefore requested that his servant promise not to marry off his son to one of the daughters of the Canaanites after his death.
Rather, you shall go to my land, Aram Naharayim, and to my birthplace, Haran, where my extended family is located, the tribe into which I was born, and take from there a wife for my son, for Isaac.
The servant said to him: Perhaps the woman will not wish to follow me to this land, as it is a long journey to Canaan from Haran, which is located on the southern border of modern-day Turkey. What should I do if she refuses to leave her home to come here? Shall I return your son to the land from which you departed?
Abraham said to him: Beware lest you return my son there. It was not my choice to distance myself from the land of my birth. Therefore,
the Lord, God of the heavens, who took me from my father’s house, and from my birthplace, and who spoke to me in a prophecy, and who took an oath to me, saying: To your descendants I will give this land; He will send His angel before you to assist you, and you will successfully find and take a wife for my son from there.
And if the woman will not wish to follow you, you shall be absolved from this oath of mine, and you need not continue searching for a wife for Isaac; only you shall not return my son there, as he must remain in this land. God gave me this land, and He commanded me to dwell here; therefore, my son may not leave it either. 7
The servant placed his hand under the thigh of Abraham his master, and took an oath to him with regard to this matter.
The servant took ten of his master’s camels for the extended journey from the south of Canaan to Haran, and he went with all of his master’s goods in his hand. He took gifts and other unique articles that would convey Abraham’s status and power, as well as various items he would need during the journey. He arose and went to Aram Naharayim, to the city of Nahor.
At the end of his journey, he had the camels kneel, in contrast to horses and donkeys that generally drink while standing, outside the city by the well of water at evening time, at the time the women who draw water come out. Since the servant could not knock on every door searching for an appropriate wife for his master, he thought that visiting the well at this time of day would give him a good opportunity to see the local girls.
He said in prayer: Lord, God of my master Abraham, please arrange it for me today, and perform kindness with my master Abraham, on his behalf and in his honor.
Behold, I stand by the spring of water; and the daughters of the men of the city come out to draw water.
It shall be that the girl to whom I shall say: Tilt your jug please, while it is still on your shoulder, which was the accepted method of giving another to drink, that I may drink, and she, that girl, shall say: Drink, and I will also give your camels to drink; I will know that it is she You have thereby confirmed to be a wife for Your servant, for Isaac; and through her, if I find such a girl, I shall know that You have shown kindness to my master.
It was before he concluded to speak, while he was still praying; behold, Rebecca, who was mentioned earlier (22:23), was coming out. Either she arrived first, before the other girls, or she stood out in some manner. The verse proceeds to restate her lineage: It was Rebecca who was born to Betuel, son of Milka, the primary wife , rather than a concubine, of Nahor, brother of Abraham. This is Abraham’s closest family (see 22:24). And her jug was on her shoulder as she came.
And the girl was good-looking, a virgin, and a man had not been intimate with her, which indicates that she was modest. Naturally, the servant became aware of these facts only later. She descended to the spring, she filled her jug, and ascended from the spring, which was slightly lower than the area surrounding it.
The girl, whose dress likely indicated that she was unmarried, and who appeared to him to be the appropriate age for Isaac, impressed Abraham’s servant. Therefore, the servant ran toward her, and he said: Please allow me to sip a little water from your jug.
She said: Drink, my lord, and she hurried and lowered her jug on her hand, and gave him to drink. Instead of tilting the jug while it was still on her shoulder, Rebecca took the extra effort of removing the heavy container from her shoulder, so that it would be easier for the servant to drink. 8
She concluded giving him to drink, and after he had drunk his fill she said: It is not enough for you alone to drink; I will draw for your camels and give them to drink as well, until they conclude to drink and their thirst is satiated.
She hurried, emptied the water that remained in her jug into the trough, ran again to the well to draw, and drew for all his camels. It is no simple matter to give ten camels all the water they require; even a single camel that has traveled a long distance will consume a tremendous amount of water.
Therefore, the man stared at her as she ran back and forth from the well to the trough and was astonished at her. He was still silent, waiting to know whether the Lord had made his journey successful or not. In light of her actions, he was certainly wondering about her identity and her family background, and thinking how he could learn more about her.
It was when the camels concluded to drink; the man took a gold nose ring, a kind of medallion placed on one’s nose or forehead, whose weight was one half shekel, and two bracelets that were to be strapped on her hands, whose weight was ten gold shekels. Based on comparisons with other sources, these were large and expensive pieces of jewelry. The servant initially removed the ornaments from his bag, then asked her for her identity, and only upon receiving a satisfactory answer did he give her the ring and bracelets. This is the interpretation of the Rashbam and the Ramban, although Rashi (verse 23) explains the sequence of events differently.
The servant then asked Rebecca two questions: First, he said: Whose daughter are you; please tell me. It was not considered proper etiquette for a stranger to ask a girl’s name; therefore he inquired into the identity of her family. Second, he asked: Is there room in your father’s house for us to stay the night, as it is evident from your behavior that you come from a family that is hospitable to guests.
She said to him: I am the daughter of Betuel, son of Milka, whom she bore to Nahor.
She then said to him: With regard to your second question, both straw and feed is plentiful with us, as well as room to stay the night. She responded to the questions in the order in which they were asked. As noted by the Sages, it is considered the trait of a wise person to answer questions in the same order that they were posed. 9
The condition that the servant had earlier stipulated (verse 14) was merely divination, and its fulfillment alone did not prove that this girl was destined to marry Isaac. 10 However, once it became clear that the same girl who fulfilled his conditions was also a close relative of Abraham, the man bowed and prostrated himself to the Lord.
He said: Blessed is the Lord, God of my master Abraham, who did not withhold His kindness and His truth from my master. I have been guided by the Lord on the proper and correct way, and He ensured that I traveled to the very house of my master’s brethren.
The girl ran and told her mother’s household akin to these matters.
Rebecca had a brother and his name was Laban. It can be inferred from the continuation of the story that Laban was the firstborn, as well as the dominant figure in the family. And Laban ran out to the man, to the spring. After Rebecca ran to her home, her brother ran from the house to discover more about the mysterious man who had arrived from afar, given gifts to his sister, questioned her, and requested to lodge in their house.
Perhaps in his role as the older brother Laban wanted to ensure that everything would transpire in an appropriate and ethical manner, and it was for this reason that he ran to greet the servant. However, it is also possible that his motivations were less pure. It was when he saw the nose ring and the bracelets upon his sister’s hands, an indication of wealth, and when he heard the words of Rebecca his sister, saying: So spoke the man to me, that he asked me certain questions, prayed, and engaged in other activities, but he did not relate any information about himself, that he, Laban, came to the man and behold, he was standing beside the camels at the spring.
He, Laban, said: Come, blessed of the Lord; why do you stand outside when I have cleared the house so that there will be room for you and your entourage to stay? Abraham’s servant was accompanied by other subordinates, as is evident from the next verse. Laban continues: And in addition, there is even a place for the ten camels, who take up a large area.
The man came to the house and he, Laban, 11 unloaded the camels; he gave straw and feed for the camels, and, as was customary in honor of a guest after a long journey, Laban gave him water to wash his feet and the feet of the men who were with him.
Following the greeting he received, Abraham’s servant entered the house. Food was placed before him to eat, and he said: I will not eat until I have spoken my words. If the servant were to eat and lodge in the house, he would already feel a certain debt of gratitude to his hosts. Therefore, he insists on first explaining the purpose of his visit and his intentions, and only then will he eat. He, Laban, said: Speak.
He said: I am Abraham’s servant, and I am responsible for all matters in my master’s household.
The Lord has greatly blessed my master; and he became much more wealthy than when he lived in Haran with your family. He, God, gave him flocks and cattle, and silver and gold, and slaves and maidservants, and camels and donkeys. In addition, Abraham and Sarah were childless when they left Haran and already advanced in age, but since then,
Sarah, my master’s wife, whom you know well, as she too is from your family, bore a son to my master after her old age. And as my master is Abraham’s foremost son, he gave to him everything that he has.
The previous comments invite an obvious question: If Abraham is such an illustrious and wealthy individual, and all of his wealth will be inherited by this one son, why has he sent his servant so far away to find a wife for that son? The servant therefore explains: My master administered an oath to me, saying: You shall not take a wife for my son from the daughters of the Canaanites, in whose land I live.
Rather, you shall go to my father’s house and to my family, and take a wife for my son from there. Since my master desires to remain within the framework of his family, he insisted that I should not find a wife for his son from any other nation, but only from his family.
I said to my master: Perhaps the woman will not follow me. The mention of this exchange is significant for the continuation of the story.
He said to me: The Lord, before whom I walked, whom I served, will send His angel with you and will make your path successful; and you shall take a wife for my son from my family, and from my father’s house.
If you take such a wife, then you shall be absolved of my oath, when you come to my family and request from them a wife for my son; and if they do not give her to you, you shall likewise be absolved of my oath.
I came this day to the spring, and I said: Lord, God of my master Abraham, if You would please make the path upon which I am going successful.
Behold, I am standing beside the spring of water; and there will be the young woman who comes out to draw, that I say to her: Please give me a little water to drink from your jug;
and she will say to me: You too drink, and I will draw for your camels as well; she is the woman whom the Lord has confirmed for my master’s son.
Before I concluded to speak to my heart, behold, Rebecca came out with her jug on her shoulder; and she descended to the spring, and drew. I said to her: Please give me drink.
She hurried and lowered her pitcher from her shoulder, and said: Drink, and I will give to your camels to drink as well. I drank and she gave to the camels to drink as well.
I then asked her and said: Whose daughter are you? She said: Daughter of Betuel, son of Nahor, whom Milka bore to him. I subsequently placed the ring on her nose, and the bracelets on her arms.
I bowed and prostrated myself to the Lord, and blessed the Lord, God of my master Abraham, who guided me in the true path to take the daughter of my master’s brother for his son. This concludes the servant’s narration of the events that led him to his hosts.
And now he submits his request: If you will do kindness and truth with my master and agree to give the girl in marriage to the son of my master, tell me. And if you do not desire this match, likewise tell me; and I will turn to the right or to the left. I shall search elsewhere for a wife for the son of my master, as I can ask other family members as well.
Laban and Betuel answered and said: The matter comes from the Lord, and evidently it is destined in Heaven for Rebecca to marry Isaac; we can speak to you neither bad nor good. The mention of Laban’s name before his father’s is indicative of his central role; perhaps Betuel was weak or ill at the time.
Behold, Rebecca is before you, take her, and go, and she shall be a wife for your master’s son, as the Lord has spoken.
It was when Abraham’s servant heard their statement of consent, he prostrated himself to the earth to the Lord, again expressing his thanks for the success of his mission.
The servant produced vessels of silver, vessels of gold, and garments, and he gave them to Rebecca; and he gave her brother and her mother precious objects, food or gifts, as a tribute for the match.
He and the men who were with him ate and drank and stayed the night, as the previous events and discussions all took place during the evening hours: He met Rebecca toward the end of the day before the sun set (verse 11). They most likely reached her house in the early evening hours, after which he dined with her family. They arose in the morning, and he, the servant, said: Send me to my master. I wish to return to him and fulfill his request. His implicit intention was that they should send the girl with him, and thereby allow him to complete his mission.
Her brother, who again spoke first, and her mother said: Let the girl remain with us for a full period, one year, or ten months; afterward she shall go. It is preferable that she remain here in the meantime; she may leave after all of the necessary preparations for her departure and her wedding have been completed.
He said to them: Do not delay me, as the Lord has made my path successful; send me and I will go to my master.
They said: We will call the girl and ask her response.
They called Rebecca and said to her: Will you go with this man? Some commentaries suggest that their use of the term “this man” instead of referring to him as the servant of Abraham, was a veiled warning: Do you really agree to undertake a long journey with this unfamiliar man? 12 She said: I will go.
After Rebecca’s response, her family were left with no choice, and therefore they sent Rebecca their sister, and her nursemaid, and Abraham’s servant, and his men.
They blessed Rebecca, and said to her: Our sister, may you become thousands and ten thousands. We wish that a great nation should come from you, and let your descendants defeat and inherit the gate of their enemies.
Rebecca and her young women rose. Since Nahor’s family was noble and wealthy, Rebecca was sent with her nursemaid and other girls to accompany her. And they rode upon the camels, and followed the man. Rebecca’s nursemaid and servants rode on the camels that were led by Abraham’s other subordinates, while the servant took Rebecca himself, personally overseeing her well-being, and went.
Isaac came from going to visit the area of Be’er Lahai Roi, the location where the angel of God had found Hagar. This name was due to Hagar’s vision of God there; it means the well [ be’er ] of the living [ ĥai ] God of my vision [ ro’i ] (see 16:14). And he, Isaac, was living in the land of the South.
Isaac went out to walk [ lasuah · ] in the field among the bushes [ siĥim ] 13 toward evening; and he lifted his eyes, and behold, he saw camels coming.
Presumably realizing that their caravan was approaching their destination, Rebecca lifted her eyes, and she saw Isaac. Perhaps his appearance had been previously described to her, or she possibly identified him by his dress and manner as a noble individual, as he was strolling in the field rather than working. She might have intuitively sensed that he was Isaac. In any event, she was excited, and she fell from the camel. This probably means that she leaned toward the servant, who was walking next to her and leading the camel.
She said to the servant, as she leaned toward him: Who is that man who walks in the field toward us? He appears to me to be an exceptional individual. Although Rebecca had apparently already identified Isaac, perhaps she wanted her suspicions confirmed. Alternatively, the dialogue in this verse preceded the events of the previous verse. 14 The servant said: He is my master, Isaac. She took the veil and covered herself. Since her journey was complete, and she was now about to meet her future husband, she covered herself with a veil in a formal manner.
The servant related to Isaac all the matters that he had done, his own actions, as well as the miraculous fashion in which his mission was accomplished.
Isaac brought her into the tent of his mother Sarah. As a distinguished woman, Sarah likely had her own tent, in which she kept her personal possessions. This tent, located in Hebron, remained empty after her death, and it was here that Isaac brought Rebecca. It is possible that this is the tent referred to earlier, in the story of Abraham’s hospitality to the angels (18:9–10). He took Rebecca, she became his wife, and he loved her. Isaac was comforted after his mother. Evidently, his mother had died not long before. As Sarah’s only son, Isaac felt a deep inner void upon her passing. Upon the arrival of Rebecca, he finally felt that he could be comforted after his mother’s demise. He brought Rebecca to Sarah’s tent because she was expected to take over the matriarchal role in the family, a function that she would indeed fulfill in an important sense later.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 25
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 25 somebodyFollowing the banishment of Ishmael to the desert with Hagar, the death of Sarah, and the marriage of Isaac, Abraham, who was left alone, took another wife, and her name was Ketura.
She bore him Zimran, and Yokshan, and Medan, and Midyan, and Yishbak, and Shuah.
And Yokshan begot Sheva and Dedan. These tribes possibly lived in the southern Arabian peninsula. 15 Sheva and Dedan also appear in the list of the sons of Raama, son of Kush, son of Ham (see 10:7). And the sons of Dedan were Ashurim, and Letushim, and Le’umim. These are either simply the names of the tribes, 16 or descriptions of their character traits, which mean, respectively: Those who dwell in encampments, those who are swift, and those who form nation-units. 17
And the sons of Midyan, who is listed here among the sons of Abraham, were: Ephah, and Efer, and Hanokh, and Avida, and Eldaa. All these were the children of Ketura. Since Abraham was very old and had been infertile until the births of Ishmael and Isaac, some commentaries suggest that these were the sons of Ketura alone, and were not Abraham’s, although he raised them in his house. 18 However, this explanation is not particularly convincing. It seems more likely that whereas Abraham considered himself elderly and advanced in age, he was still quite capable of procreation and he himself fathered a number of children from Ketura. It can also be inferred from here and from the story of the birth of Ishmael that it was Sarah who was infertile.
Although these additional offspring were born to him, Abraham gave all that was his to Isaac.
And to the sons of the concubines of Abraham, Hagar and Ketura, Abraham gave gifts. Since he did not deem them his inheritors, he instead gave them presents, in the form of money or valuables, but not property. And he sent them away from Isaac his son, while he was still alive, so that they should not contest Isaac’s inheritance. They traveled eastward, to the east country. The nations that have been identified from this list indeed lived on the eastern side of the Jordan River, and reached as far as the southern portion of the Negev, perhaps even to the Arabian Peninsula. These nations were sent eastward, and dwelled together with the descendants of Ishmael, and do not feature in the main narrative of the Torah.
These are the days of the years of Abraham’s life that he lived, one hundred and seventy-five years. Abraham lived for many years after his wife Sarah passed away.
Abraham expired and died at a good old age. His later years were pleasant, without battles, struggles, or tension in his family. He was aged in years and content with his life. And he was gathered to his people, his soul returned to its source. This expression is used by the Bible only in reference to the passing of righteous individuals.
Isaac and Ishmael, his eldest sons, buried him in the Cave of Makhpela, in the field of Efron son of Tzohar the Hitite, that is located before Mamre. They knew that Abraham had purchased this land for a burial plot and that he had buried Sarah there.
The field that Abraham purchased from the children of Het; there Abraham was buried, and Sarah his wife. Their descendants would later be buried there as well.
It was after the death of Abraham, God blessed Isaac his son; and Isaac lived beside Be’er Lahai Roi in the Negev, where he was engaged primarily in shepherding sheep. The Torah will later relate that he also worked in agriculture (26:12).
Following the completion of the story of Abraham’s life, the Torah deals briefly with his secondary offspring, thereby rounding out the picture with regard to his children. These are the descendants of Ishmael son of Abraham, whom Hagar the Egyptian, Sarah’s maidservant, bore to Abraham.
And these are the names of the sons of Ishmael, by their names, according to their birth: The firstborn of Ishmael was Nevayot. And the other sons of Ishmael, some of whom became heads of families, tribes, or small nations, are: Kedar, Adbe’el, Mivsam,
Mishma, Duma, Masa,
Hadad, Temah, Yetur, Nafish, and Kedem.
These are the sons of Ishmael and these are their names. The sons of Ishmael typically did not construct permanent settlements. Rather, they dwelled in their enclosures, which were considered semi-permanent living places, and in their fortifications, structures that were capable of shielding them when necessary. The sum total of the sons of Ishmael was twelve princes of their nations. Each one of them was the prince of a small nation.
These are the years of the life of Ishmael: He lived for one hundred and thirty-seven years; and he expired and died; and he was gathered to his people.
They, the sons of Ishmael, dwelled from Havila , 19 until Shur that is adjacent to Egypt, all the way to Ashur: He resided [ nafal ] adjacent to all his brethren. Alternatively: His portion was ultimately adjacent to his brethren . The term nafal here possibly means conquest, so that the tribes of Ishmael ruled over their brethren, the children of Ketura.
And this is the legacy, the events in the life, of Isaac, Abraham’s son: Abraham begot Isaac.
Isaac was forty years old when he took Rebecca, daughter of Betuel the Aramean, from Padan Aram, who was the sister of Laban the Aramean, to be his wife. Padan means field; there is a similar word in Arabic. 1
Isaac entreated and prayed fervently to the Lord on behalf of his wife while standing opposite her, because he understood from the fact that she had not given birth in the many years since they were married (see verse 26) that she was barren. The Lord acceded to his entreaty, and Rebecca his wife conceived.
During her pregnancy the children were agitated within her. It will soon become clear that she was bearing fraternal twins. Sensing that something was abnormal and cause for concern, she said: If so, if the pregnancy is so difficult, why am I like this, why do I want it? Alternatively, this means: If my suffering is so great, what is the point of living? And she went to inquire of the Lord. At the time, there were distinguished individuals who accepted the faith of Abraham and his family, such as Malkitzedek king of Shalem (see 14:18–20). Rebecca sought prophetic instruction from such a man. 2
The Lord said to her: Two peoples, or national leaders (see, e.g., 17:16), are in your womb, and two nations shall be separated from your innards. From the moment they are born it will be clear that they are very different from one another. One nation will prevail over the other nation, as the struggle between them, which you sense within your womb, will continue after they are born. And the elder shall serve the younger. Even in the case of twins, one is born before the other and is the elder.
Her days to give birth were complete, and behold, there were twins in her womb.
The first emerged with red skin, redder than that of an average person. 3 And he was covered, all of him like a cloak of hair, as he was very hairy. And they called his name Esau, perhaps due to his hair [ se’ar ], or because he appeared mature, like an object that is fully fashioned [ asui ]. 4
And thereafter his brother emerged. Their birth, like her pregnancy, was unusual, as his hand was grasping Esau’s heel [ akev ]; and he called his name Jacob [ Ya’akov ]. Isaac was sixty years old when she bore them. Since he married Rebecca at the age of forty, evidently they had lived twenty years as a childless couple.
The lads grew, and the prophecy that they would follow different paths indeed came to pass. Alongside their joint family obligations in housekeeping and agriculture, their diverse natures began to show: Esau was a man who knew hunting, an adventurer who was dissatisfied with domestic tasks and ventured out to hunt animals, a man of the large field, of the open plains. And Jacob was a guileless man, uninterested in the ruses of hunting, in ambushes and setting traps. 5 He led a sedentary lifestyle, living in tents. Alternatively, the verse could mean that he was a shepherd, expert in tending flocks, as can be seen from later events in his life. 6
And Isaac loved Esau because of the game in his mouth, and Rebecca loved Jacob. It is possible that Rebecca’s preference for Jacob was due to the fact that he lived at home, in close proximity to her.
One day Jacob, who was home much of the time, stewed a stew. Esau came from the field, probably after an unsuccessful hunting expedition, and he was weary, exhausted and thirsty. 7
Esau said to Jacob: Feed me please from that red, red [ adom ha’adom ] dish. Esau did not know what red food was in the pot. He said: Please feed me, as I am so weary that it is too hard for me to bring a spoon to my own mouth. In this connection the verse notes: Therefore his name is called Edom. This incident, in which Esau connected himself to a red [ adom ] dish, stuck to him for the rest of his life and to his descendants for many later generations, to the point that Edom became his alternate designation.
Jacob said: Just as you have a request from me, I too have something to ask of you. Sell me your birthright this day, meaning now.
And Esau said: Behold, I am going to die; I am so tired that I feel that I am about to collapse. For what do I need a birthright? Even if some sort of financial benefit will accrue from the birthright, it will be actualized only in the distant future, and Esau the hunter is not a calculating individual who makes long-term plans.
Jacob said: I am not satisfied with a simple declaration that you don’t care about the birthright. Rather, take an oath to me this day that you are transferring it to me. He took an oath to him that the birthright would belong to him, and he sold his birthright to Jacob. It is possible that the stew was given in payment for the birthright. However, it can be argued that as part of the family meal, the stew was not Jacob’s to sell to his brother. If so, perhaps Esau sold the birthright for a substantial sum, which Jacob handed over immediately or promised to give at a later time. 8
And Jacob gave Esau bread and a stew of lentils. Jacob fed Esau, in accordance with the custom to eat a meal at the conclusion of an acquisition. 9 By serving a meal, Jacob exhibited the seriousness of the purchase of the birthright for him. He, Esau, ate and he drank, and after he recovered and realized that he was not going to die, he arose, and he went, and Esau scorned the birthright. He remembered the sale, but he considered the entire incident ridiculous, pointless, and meaningless.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 26
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 26 somebodyThere was a famine in the land, besides the first famine that was during the days of Abraham. Isaac, who was a shepherd living in the south of the land of Canaan, went to Avimelekh king of the Philistines, to Gerar. Avimelekh was one of the local rulers of the Philistines, and perhaps he was king over all the Philistines at the time. 10
The Lord appeared to him, and said: Do not go down to Egypt; dwell in the land that I will tell you. Like the other forefathers, Isaac too merited a divine revelation.
Reside in this land, and I will be with you, and I will bless you; for I will give all these lands to you and to your descendants, and I will keep the oath that I took to Abraham your father. You belong to this land, and it belongs to you and your descendants, and therefore you must stay here and live here.
And I will multiply your descendants like the stars of the heavens, and I will give to your descendants all these lands; and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed through your descendants.
However, your right to the land is not due exclusively to your own merit; rather, it originated because Abraham heeded My voice, and kept My commission, My commandments, My statutes, and My laws.
Isaac lived in Gerar. Since he was prohibited from leaving for Egypt, Isaac remained in Gerar.
The men of the place asked him with regard to his wife. He said: She is my sister. Isaac thereby followed Abraham’s example (12:13, 20:2). In a sense his claim was justified, as Rebecca was related to him. It is possible that Isaac and Rebecca were similar enough in appearance that this contention would be accepted. As he was afraid to say: She is my wife, for he said to himself: Lest the men of the place kill me over Rebecca, because she is of fair appearance. An earlier verse already mentioned Rebecca’s beauty as a young girl (24:16), but her age at the time of this incident is not stated. Perhaps due to the negative experience of the residents of Gerar during Abraham’s earlier visit (20:1–18), they accepted Isaac’s claim at face value, and were careful not to take a woman from his tribe.
Yet, it was when the days he was there were extended, and Isaac was less careful; Avimelekh king of the Philistines looked out through the window, as he presumably lived in a palace that was taller than the surrounding buildings, and behold, he saw Isaac in his house playing, engaging in sexual activity, with Rebecca his wife.
Avimelekh summoned Isaac and said: Behold, I have seen that she is your wife; how did you say: She is my sister? Why did you deceive me? Isaac said to him: Because I said, or I thought to myself: Lest I die over her. If I reveal that she is my wife, they might kill me and take her.
Avimelekh said: What is this that you have done to us, by cheating us? One of the men of the people almost lay with your wife; you would have brought guilt, sin, upon us. Whether this is the same Avimelekh as in the days of Abraham or a different individual, 11 what unfolded when Sarah was taken (see chap. 20) had not been forgotten in Avimelekh’s household. Therefore, Isaac did not rely on the moral probity of the residents of Gerar.
Avimelekh commanded all the people, saying: Anyone who touches this man or his wife, as it has now been established that Rebecca is Isaac’s wife, shall be put to death.
Up to this point, the incidents in Isaac’s life parallel events that occurred in Abraham’s life. The focus now turns to deeds performed by Isaac that were apparently not done by his father. It is likely that Abraham the nomad was occupied mainly with shepherding. In contrast, Isaac, who lived in Gerar, engaged also in agriculture. Isaac sowed in that land and found in that year one hundredfold. He reaped one hundred times what he sowed, a very respectable yield even nowadays. And the explanation for this unusually large crop is that the Lord blessed him.
The man grew wealthy, and continued to grow until he became very wealthy. Since Isaac grew more crops than he required, he sold the surplus and became wealthy as a result.
He had livestock of flocks, and livestock of cattle, and a great household, a general term covering slaves, maidservants, and all his household staff; 12 the Philistines envied him, as his neighbors were not similarly blessed in their fields.
Here the chapter inserts a comment that will be important for the continuation of the story: All the cisterns that his father’s servants dug in the days of Abraham, his father, the Philistines sealed them after Abraham left Gerar, and filled them with earth. Isaac was uncomfortable in Gerar not only due to his great wealth, which aroused envy among his neighbors, but also because his father’s wells had been filled with earth.
The envy and general resentment of the residents of Gerar toward Isaac also finds expression in a statement of the king, which represents the overall feeling of the public. Avimelekh said to Isaac: Leave us, for you have grown much mightier than we. You are too strong for us; one who grows wealthy in such an irregular manner is liable to upset the social and political balance in our community.
Isaac left there, probably southward, and he encamped in the Valley of Gerar and settled there.
As he required water in his new place, Isaac again dug the cisterns of water that they had dug in the days of Abraham, his father, and that the Philistines had sealed after the death of Abraham. There were certainly sufficient markers by which he could locate the wells. He called them names like the names that his father called them. Due to their importance, the serviceable wells were given names.
Isaac’s servants dug in the valley, as it is easy to find ground water in the channels of streams, and they found there a well of fresh water.
The herdsmen of Gerar quarreled with Isaac’s herdsmen, saying: The water is ours. Since you are residing near our city of Gerar, in our territory, the water belongs to us. He called the name of the well Esek, because they involved themselves [ hitasseku ], fought, with him.
They, Isaac’s servants, dug another well, and they, the Philistines, quarreled over it as well. He called it Sitna, accusation. 13
Again he, Isaac, moved from there and dug another well, and they did not quarrel over it. He called its name Rehovot, and he said: As now the Lord has expanded space [ hirh ] · for us, and we shall be fruitful in the land; now we can dwell in our place in peace. Isaac assumed that the herdsmen of Gerar would likely leave this particular well alone, as they preferred to tend their flocks nearer to their city, and the well was situated far from their territory.
He, Isaac, ascended from there to Beersheba, which was at a higher altitude than his previous location in the Valley of Gerar, as Beersheba was built on a raised area. It is also possible that Isaac’s move to Beersheba is described as an ascension due to the importance of the city.
The Lord appeared to him that night and said: I am the God of Abraham your father. Fear not, despite the fact that you have been forced to move due to the provocations of the Philistines, as I am with you; I will bless you and multiply your descendants for the sake of My servant Abraham.
He built an altar there and proclaimed the name of the Lord. Like Abraham, Isaac performed a ceremony or prayer in which he publicly invoked God’s name. And he pitched his tent there. And Isaac’s servants dug a well there, near Beersheba.
Later, Avimelekh king of the Philistines went to him, Isaac, from Gerar, with a group of his associates and Pikhol the captain of his guard.
Upon seeing the arrival of a friendly delegation, Isaac said to them: Why did you come to me? After all, you hated me, and you sent me from among you.
They said: We saw that the Lord was with you, since you grew and prospered beyond the status of a private individual, and therefore we said: Let there please be an oath of a covenant between us, between us and you; we will establish a covenant with you:
If you will or so that you will 14 do us no harm, when we have not touched you, and when we have done only good with you, and we sent you in peace. While it is true that we feared you and banished you from our land, nevertheless you lived among us for a certain period and were not sent away in a violent manner or with hatred. Perhaps we were mistaken in dismissing you; in any case we see that you are now the blessed of the Lord, and therefore we wish to establish a covenant with you.
Isaac agreed, and he made a feast for them, and they ate and drank, in accordance with the custom after establishing a covenant.
They awoke in the morning and took oaths to one another that they would keep the covenant and maintain friendly relations from that time forward. Isaac sent them back, and they went from him in peace.
It was on that day that Avimelekh left, and Isaac’s servants came and told him with regard to the well that they had dug. Isaac’s servants had continued digging wells. They said to him: We have again found water.
He called it Shiva, in allusion to the oath [ shevua ] ; therefore, the name of the city is Beersheba to this day.
Esau was forty years old. Esau tried to imitate his father, at least on the superficial level. Just as Isaac married at forty, at an age when one’s mind is already settled, 15 Esau did the same. And he took as a wife Yehudit, daughter of Be’eri the Hitite, and Basmat, daughter of Eilon the Hitite, who were two Hitite women.
The Torah attests: They were a source of bitterness to Isaac and to Rebecca.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 27
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 27 somebodyIt was when Isaac was old, and his eyes dimmed from seeing, as he became blind, or his sight diminished considerably; he summoned Esau, his elder son, and said to him: My son. He, Esau, said to him: Here I am. Esau responded in the proper manner, as there was a mutually positive relationship between father and son.
He, Isaac, said: Behold, I have now 16 grown old; I do not know the day of my death. In actuality, Isaac lived far longer than he expected, for as it follows from various calculations, he did not die until many years after this episode. Perhaps due to his blindness and inactive life, he felt old and frail before his time.
Now, please take your hunting gear, your quiver, which is hung on one’s back, and your bow, and go out to the field and hunt game for me.
Prepare for me tasty food from the animals you capture, such as I like. As stated above (25:28), Esau would regularly feed Isaac from the animals he hunted, and Isaac enjoyed such meals. And bring it to me, and I will eat, so that my soul will bless you before I die.
Rebecca heard as Isaac spoke to Esau his son. Esau went to the field, in accordance with his father’s command, to hunt game in order to bring it to him.
Rebecca said to Jacob her son, saying: Behold, I heard your father speak to Esau your brother, saying as follows:
Bring me game and prepare for me tasty food, and I will eat, and I will bless you before the Lord before my death.
Now, my son, heed my voice to that which I command you. Rebecca invokes her authority in her address to her son, as she is telling him to perform a complicated and ostensibly questionable maneuver.
Please go to the flock and take for me from there two fine goat kids. Rebecca assumed that Esau would return from his hunt with a deer or two. Consequently, she asked Jacob to bring two goat kids, which are similar in taste to deer. 17 And I will make them tasty food for your father, such as he likes. Since she knew how to cook for her husband and was familiar with his sensitivities, it was likely that she could prepare him a dish of goat meat whose taste he would be unable to distinguish from that of deer meat.
You shall bring it to your father and he will eat, so that he will bless you before his death.
And Jacob said to Rebecca his mother: I cannot approach my father as Esau, as behold, Esau my brother is a hairy man. Covered with hair already at birth, Esau had become even more hairy over the years. And I am a man of smooth skin. Jacob might not have been entirely hairless, but he was smooth-skinned in comparison to Esau.
Perhaps my father will feel me, not necessarily to discover my identity, but innocently, due to our physical proximity; 18 and I shall be in his eyes as a deceiver, a trickster, as he will realize that I have disguised myself as Esau. And this is dangerous, as I shall bring upon myself a curse and not a blessing.
His mother said to him: If you will be cursed, your curse is upon me, my son. This is a rhetorical expression of her acceptance of responsibility for the curse. 19 Only in the meantime heed my voice, and go, take the goat kids for me, as I have commanded you.
He went, and took the kids, and brought them to his mother, as she requested; and his mother made tasty food, such as his father liked.
In response to the problem Jacob had raised, Rebecca took the fine garments, the best clothes, reserved for special occasions, of Esau, her elder son, that were with her in the house, and she dressed Jacob, her younger son, in them.
The hides of the kids of the goats she placed as sleeves on his hands and on the smooth of his neck, as these are the exposed areas of the body where the difference between the brothers is likely to be most noticeable. When the blind Isaac felt the hides, he would assume that it was Esau standing before him.
She gave the tasty food and the bread that she prepared into the hand of Jacob her son.
He came to his father and said: My father. He, Isaac, said: Here I am; who are you, my son? It is possible that the voices of the twins, Jacob and Esau, were very similar, and therefore Isaac would always ask this question upon their arrival.
Jacob said to his father: I am Esau your firstborn; I did as you spoke to me. Arise now, sit and eat from my game, so that your soul will bless me.
Since Jacob did not go out hunting but simply took goat kids from the goat shed, he arrived sooner than his father had anticipated. Therefore, Isaac said to his son: How is it that you hastened so to find it, my son? According to my calculation, the hunt and the preparation of the dish should have taken longer. He, Jacob, said: Because the Lord your God coordinated it, the outcome, so that the game appeared before me without delay.
Sensing that something strange was going on, Isaac said to Jacob: Please approach, that I may feel you, my son, so that I will know: Are you my son Esau or not? Due to his faulty eyesight, Isaac was unable to tell the twins apart.
Jacob approached Isaac his father, and he, Isaac, felt him. He said: The voice is the voice of Jacob, as the subtleties of the voice bring to mind the voice of Jacob, but the hands are the hands of Esau.
He did not recognize him, because his hands were hairy like the hands of his brother, Esau; and he blessed him. Although Jacob’s voice unnerved Isaac, his hands felt like those of Esau. Some say that Jacob’s vocabulary was also identical to that of Esau. 20
He said: Are you my son Esau? Isaac sought further confirmation of his identity. He said: I am.
He said, in a somewhat ceremonial fashion: Serve me, and I will eat from my son’s game so that my soul will bless you. He served him, and he ate, and he brought him wine, and he drank.
After eating, Isaac’s spirits lifted, and he sensed a closeness to his son. And Isaac his father said to him: Approach and kiss me, my son.
He , Jacob, approached and kissed him. He, Isaac, smelled the scent of his, Esau’s, fine garments, which had absorbed the scent of one who frequents the fields, and he blessed him and said: See, the scent of my son is as the scent of a field that the Lord blessed. The Sages suggest that Isaac smelled the scent of an orchard, 21 as a field of grain does not emit a pleasant fragrance, whereas one can smell the fruit in an area planted with trees.
While smelling the scent of the blessed field in the present, Isaac blesses Jacob with successful fields throughout his life. God will give you from the dew of the heavens, from the fat of the earth, and an abundance of grain and wine.
From bread and wine, the blessing turns to the nation that will descend from Jacob. Peoples will serve you, and nations will prostrate themselves to you. Be a lord and leader to your brethren, conquer them, and your mother’s sons will prostrate themselves to you. Cursed be one who curses you, and blessed be one that blesses you.
It was when Isaac concluded blessing Jacob, and Jacob had just departed from the presence of Isaac his father, that Esau his brother came from his hunt. Fortunately, Esau arrived only after Jacob had received the blessings and left the room.
He, Esau, too made tasty food, and brought it to his father. He said to his father: Let my father arise, and eat from his son’s game, so that your soul will bless me.
Isaac his father said to him: Who are you? Isaac was confused by this second entrance. He said: I am your son, your firstborn, Esau.
Isaac was overcome with great trembling, as he realized something terrible had occurred. And he said: Who is it then who hunted game and brought it to me? I ate from it all before you came, and I blessed him; indeed, he shall be blessed. I know that the blessing has taken effect.
When Esau heard the words of his father, he cried a very great and bitter cry, in disappointment, anger, and frustration. And he said to his father: Bless me too, my father.
He, Isaac, said to him: Your brother came with deceit, and he took your blessing. The blessing has already taken effect and I cannot retract it. What’s done is done.
He, Esau, said in anger: Is it for this that his name was called Jacob [ Ya’akov ]? Although Jacob was originally named for the manner in which he held on to Esau’s heel [ akev ] at birth (see 25:26), and thus was born on his brother’s heels, here Esau uses the same root in its meaning of deceit and cheating. As he deceived me [ vayakveni ] these two times: He took my birthright, as he purchased it from me with deception, and behold, now he also took my blessing. Having been told that Isaac cannot undo what he had done, he said: Have you not reserved a blessing for me? There must be some kind of blessing left for me. You could not have granted Jacob all possible blessings.
Isaac answered and he said to Esau: Behold, I have made him a lord to you; I have given to him all his brethren as servants; and I have supported him with grain and wine; I have blessed him that produce and wine should be easily available to him. For you then, what shall I do, my son? Since I am unable to negate his blessing, what blessing can I bestow upon you that will correspond to that which Jacob received?
Esau said to his father: Have you but one blessing, my father? There must be a blessing that does not conflict with the one you have already bestowed upon Jacob. Bless me too, my father, with some sort of blessing. And in his despair, Esau raised his voice and wept.
Ultimately, Isaac finds a way to bless his elder son as well. And Isaac his father answered and said to him: Behold, from the fat of the earth shall be your dwelling, you too shall inherit a fertile portion, and from the dew of the heavens above.
By your sword you shall live. Since you are not the firstborn, you do not enjoy full rights to your place of dwelling, and therefore you will constantly have to fight for it. And you shall serve your brother. But it will be when you revolt that you will free yourself from him, and you will remove his yoke from your neck. However, in the basic state of affairs, he will be the lord and you will be his slave.
Esau hated Jacob because of the blessing that his father blessed him, and for the results of that blessing. Esau said in his heart: The days of mourning for my father will approach, or my father will die, and I will kill my brother Jacob. Out of respect for his father, whom he accepted as a figure of authority, Esau would not dare to harm his brother while Isaac was still alive.
The words of Esau her elder son were told to Rebecca; she sent and summoned Jacob her younger son and said to him: Behold, your brother Esau consoles himself in your regard to kill you. He consoles himself with the thought that he will kill you. 22
Now my son, heed my voice. Just as you listened to me and took the blessing, which brought you into this problematic situation, you should once again obey me, this time in order to get you out of it. And arise, flee to Laban my brother, to Haran, where you can take refuge.
Live with him a few years, until your brother’s anger subsides;
until your brother’s anger subsides from you, and he forgets that which you did to him, and until the matter of the blessings ceases to bother him. Once I see that his anger has calmed, I will send a messenger and take you from there, Haran. If you do not leave and keep away, you are liable to fight and even kill each other. Why should I be bereaved of both of you on one day?
Rebecca said to Isaac: I loathe my life, I am tired of life, due to the daughters of Het, whom Esau married (see 26:34–35). If Jacob takes a wife from the daughters of Het, like these, from the daughters of the land, why do I need life? Rebecca hints to Isaac that he should suggest that Jacob follow his example and take a wife from his family who live far away, rather than from the local daughters of Het.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 28
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 28 somebodyAs a result of Rebecca’s statement, or perhaps after arriving at this decision independently, Isaac summoned Jacob. He blessed him, and he commanded him; he said to him: Do not take a wife from the daughters of Canaan, in the manner of your brother.
Arise, go to Padan Aram, to the house of Betuel, father of your mother, and take yourself a wife from there, from the daughters of Laban, brother of your mother. Apparently Isaac knew that Laban had daughters, as some sort of contact was maintained between the families.
Isaac now bestows another blessing upon Jacob: May God Almighty, a name of God that expresses His might and His many deeds, bless you, and make you fruitful and multiply you; may you be an assembly of peoples, meaning that your descendants will become a great nation;
may He give you the blessing of Abraham – to you, and to your descendants with you – to inherit the land of your residence, which God gave to Abraham. With this statement, Isaac reaffirms the initial blessing he gave his younger son: Indeed, Jacob will inherit Abraham’s legacy.
Isaac sent Jacob, and he went to Padan Aram, to Laban, son of Betuel the Aramean, brother of Rebecca, mother of Jacob and Esau.
Esau saw that Isaac blessed Jacob and sent him to Padan Aram, to take himself a wife from there. In blessing him he commanded him, saying: Do not take a wife from the daughters of Canaan.
Jacob heeded his father and his mother, and he went to Padan Aram.
Esau saw that the daughters of Canaan were objectionable in the eyes of Isaac his father. Until this point, Esau thought that the main objection to his marrying women from Canaan came from his mother. It was only now that he realized how displeased his father was with his choice.
Therefore, Esau went to his uncle Ishmael, and took Mahalat, the daughter of Ishmael son of Abraham, sister of Nevayot, Ishmael’s firstborn, in addition to his previous wives, as his wife. In this manner, he too married his cousin, as was planned for Jacob.
The Torah had interrupted the story of Jacob’s departure from Beersheba to mention Esau’s additional marriages. Now the story of Jacob continues. Jacob departed from Beersheba and went to Haran.
He came upon the place, meaning that he reached a certain location that was later revealed to be an important place, and stayed the night there, because the sun had set, and it would have been dangerous to travel at night. And he took one of the stones from the place, and placed it beneath his head as a pillow, and lay in that place.
He dreamed, and behold, in his dream, a ladder was set on the earth, and its top reaching to the heavens; and behold, the angels of God were ascending and descending on it, the ladder.
And, behold, the Lord, without the angels, stood over him, Jacob, and said: I am the Lord, God of Abraham your father, and the God of Isaac. The land upon which you lie, the land of Canaan, to you I will give it, and to your descendants.
Your descendants will be as innumerable as the dust of the earth, and you shall spread out to the west, to the east, to the north, and to the south. And all the families, the nations, of the earth shall be blessed in you and your descendants.
And, behold, I am with you; I will keep you wherever you go, and I will bring you back from Haran to this land of Canaan. For I will not leave you until I have done that which I spoke to you, returning you from there greater and stronger, and having begun to form your nation.
Jacob awoke from his sleep, and he said: Indeed, the Lord is in this place. It is due to His presence here that I experienced a dream in which He and His angels were revealed to me. And I did not know. Beforehand, I saw this place as a mere piece of land upon which I could rest.
He was awestruck, and he said: How awesome, lofty and awe-inspiring is this place; this is nothing other than the house of God, as it is worthy to be the house of God, and this is the gate of the heavens. It is likely that Jacob woke from his dream in the middle of the night and did not immediately arise from his place of rest, as dawn only arrives in the next verse.
Jacob awoke early in the morning, and as a mark of gratitude to God for His revelation and His promise to continue accompanying him, and out of a sense of obligation, he took the stone that he had placed beneath his head and established it as a monument, a stone of worship, and poured oil, which he had presumably brought for dipping his bread, on the top of it, the monument, to anoint and sanctify it.
He , Jacob, called the name of that place Beit El from that point onward. However, Luz was the name of the city initially. It is possible that Jacob thought he was sleeping in an entirely vacant area, but later realized that he was near the settlement of Luz, which will be mentioned on several occasions in the Bible. Jacob changed its name to Beit El.
Jacob took a vow, saying: If God will indeed be with me, as I heard in my dream, and He will keep me on this path that I go, and will give me bread to eat and a garment to wear, if He will grant me the basic requirements for life,
and if I return to my father’s house in peace, then the Lord shall be my God; I will dedicate myself to His service. Certainly Jacob believed in God beforehand, but here he pledges himself to His worship as a personal obligation;
and this stone that I have established as a monument, shall be the house of God. Jacob vows to establish a site of worship similar to a temple, which will stand for generations. And everything that You will give me I will tithe to You.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 29
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 29 somebodyAlthough Jacob left Beersheba as a refugee, his mood improved after the vision he received in Beit El. Therefore, Jacob lifted his feet, as his travel felt light, and now he sensed he was accompanied, protected, and shielded by God. 1 And he went to the land of the people of the east, specifically, the Arameans.
Nearing Haran, he saw, and behold, a well in the field, and behold, three flocks of sheep lying alongside it , the well, since from that well they watered the flocks, and the great stone was on the mouth of the well. The opening of the well, which was designed to be used exclusively by the inhabitants of the city and their flocks, was blocked with a large stone to prevent strangers from drawing its water.
All the flocks would gather there and they would roll the stone from the mouth of the well. Only all the shepherds together had the strength to roll the heavy stone. And therefore, when they would all arrive they would give the sheep to drink, and they would return the stone upon the mouth of the well to its place.
Although Jacob knows the general direction in which he is headed, he is unsure of the precise place where he has arrived. Jacob said to them: My brethren, from where are you? They said: We are from Haran.
He said to them: Do you know Laban son of Nahor, who lives in Haran? The attribution of Laban to Nahor his grandfather rather than to Betuel his father provides support for the theory that Betuel was not an important figure. 2 They said: We know him.
He said to them: Is he well? They said: He is well, and here is Rachel his daughter coming with the sheep. If you wish to know more, ask her. Apparently, these shepherds were not keen to speak with a stranger.
Jacob does not leave the shepherds alone, but addresses them a second time. He said: Behold, the day is still great, it is not time for the livestock to be gathered. Since it is not yet dark, you should continue your work. Give the sheep to drink, and go and herd. Why are you waiting here?
They said: We would like to water the sheep, but we cannot, as the stone is too heavy. Therefore, we must wait until all the flocks are gathered, and they, the shepherds of all the flocks, will together roll the stone from the mouth of the well; then we give the sheep to drink.
Earlier, the shepherds had told Jacob that Rachel was nearing the well. In the meantime, he was still speaking with them, and Rachel came, arriving with her father’s flock; for she was a shepherdess. This was her responsibility in the family.
It was when Jacob saw Rachel, the daughter of Laban his mother’s brother, a close relative, and the flock of Laban his mother’s brother, a flock that belonged to his relative, that Jacob approached and unaided rolled the stone from the mouth of the well, and gave the sheep of Laban his mother’s brother to drink. Jacob was so strong that he was able to lift a stone that three shepherds together could not budge.
Jacob kissed Rachel chastely, as one would a young family relation. 3 And he raised his voice, and wept out of emotion. After a journey of hundreds of miles, which certainly took him several months, spending each night in a different place, he had finally met a member of his family.
After this greeting, Jacob began to speak. Jacob told Rachel that he was her father’s brother, kinsman, and that he was Rebecca’s son. Rachel must have heard about her aunt who had traveled to a distant land, and now she had met her aunt’s son. The young girl was excited about the news, and therefore she ran and told her father.
It was when Laban heard the news of the arrival of Jacob, his sister’s son, that he ran to meet him, embraced him, kissed him, and brought him to his house, as befitting a family member. In light of Laban’s unsavory nature, as evident from the continuation of the story, some commentaries explain that he had ulterior motives for this friendly welcome. 4 He, Jacob, related to Laban all these matters. He told him that he had arrived with the aim of establishing contact with his family, and perhaps also informed him of the circumstances of his flight from home. 5
Laban said to him: Indeed, you are my bone and my flesh, a family relative. And so he lived with him a month’s time. While staying with Laban, Jacob began to help him, as he felt an obligation toward his family member.
Laban said to Jacob, after the passage of a month: Merely because you are my brother, kinsman, shall you work for me for nothing? Since you wish to labor, let us set up a formal arrangement. Tell me, what is your salary?
Here the Torah notes: Laban had two daughters: The name of the elder was Leah, and the name of the younger was Rachel.
Leah’s eyes were delicate, there was some problem with her eyes. Perhaps they were sensitive, not allowing her to shepherd outside. It is also possible that she had blue eyes, which were considered more sensitive to the rays of the sun. 6 And Rachel was of fine form, and beautiful. 7
Jacob loved Rachel. Either he fell in love with her when he first saw her approach with the sheep, or his love had developed during the month he had lived in Laban’s home. And he said: I will work for you seven years for Rachel your younger daughter, in addition to my food and lodgings. Since Jacob had brought no money, dowry, or gifts, he had to pay with his service. Apparently, Laban considered seven years of work to be suitable payment for Rachel, and he accepted Jacob’s offer.
Laban said: Better that I give her to you, than I give her to another man; live with me. Your suggestion and terms are acceptable to me.
Jacob worked seven years for Rachel; they were in his eyes but a few days, in his love of her. Since Jacob loved Rachel, seven years of work seemed to him a fair price for her hand in marriage.
Jacob said to Laban: Give me my wife, in accordance with our agreement, as my time is fulfilled; I have performed the amount of work we stipulated. And I will consort with her. Throughout that entire period Rachel was designated for Jacob, even engaged to him in a certain sense. Now Jacob sought to consummate this through marriage.
Laban gathered all the people of the place, and made a wedding feast.
It was in the evening, and he, Laban, took Leah his older daughter and brought her to him, Jacob; and he consorted with her, assuming that she was Rachel.
Laban gave Zilpa, his maidservant, to his daughter Leah as a maidservant, as one of his wedding gifts.
It was in the morning and Jacob discovered: Behold, she was Leah. He said to Laban: What is this that you did to me? Didn’t I work with you for Rachel, and why did you deceive me?
Laban said: It is not done thus in our place, to give the younger before the elder. According to our custom, the elder must be married before her younger sister.
I offer a package deal: Complete the wedding week for this one bride, and we will give you that one too, the other sister, in exchange for the work that you will work with me another seven additional years. My daughters are equally dear to me, and each of them is separately worth seven years of work. While you thought you were laboring for Rachel, you were actually working for Leah. If Leah is not enough for you, you must work another seven years.
Jacob, an isolated stranger with no other recourse, did so, as he had no choice but to accept Laban’s terms. And he completed that week, the week of celebration for the marriage of Leah, and he, Laban, gave him Rachel his daughter for a wife. Laban did not want Rachel to wait another seven years. Apparently, she had already come of age.
Laban gave to his daughter Rachel, Bilha his maidservant as a maidservant.
He also consorted with Rachel, he also loved Rachel more than Leah, even though she was not his first wife. And Jacob worked with him another seven additional years, as he had agreed.
The Lord saw that Leah was hated, and therefore He came to her aid and immediately opened her womb, and she conceived. And Rachel, however, was barren. Since they married Jacob within seven days of each other, it was conspicuous that while Leah was pregnant, Rachel was left without children.
Leah conceived and bore a son, and she called his name Reuben; she said: Because the Lord saw [ ra’a ] my affliction; for now my husband will love me, for I am the mother of his son.
Not long afterward, she conceived again and bore a son, and said: Because the Lord heard [ shama ] that I am hated, He gave me this son as well. She called his name Simeon [Shimon]. Leah’s statement here is more explicit than at the birth of Reuben, perhaps because by now the family dynamic had become even clearer. The birth of Reuben did not change Jacob’s attitude toward Leah in any substantial manner, and therefore the name of her second son does not express her hope to become his beloved, but confirms her status as unloved.
She conceived again and bore a son, and said: Now, this time, my husband will certainly accompany [ yillaveh ] and become close to me, as I have borne him three sons. Jacob will be pleased that I have given him three sons, as these are important steps in the fulfillment of his destiny. The more sons he has, the quicker his family will become a nation. Therefore, he, Jacob, called his name Levi, as he too was pleased with the addition of a third son to the family. 8
She conceived again and bore a son, and said: This time I will thank [ odeh ] the Lord for the joy in bearing so many sons and in the experience of motherhood. Therefore, she called his name Judah. And after giving birth to one child a year she ceased bearing. 9 For a time she remained the mother of four sons, and did not continue bearing children at the same pace.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 30
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 30 somebodyIn sharp contrast to Leah’s fertility, Rachel saw that she did not bear for Jacob. Consequently, Rachel envied her sister; and she said to Jacob: Give me children, and if I will not bear children I am as one dead.
Jacob was incensed at Rachel; he said: Am I in place of God who withheld from you fruit of the womb? You should not turn to me, as I have been given children by God. If you are deprived of fertility, it is between you and Him. 10
She said: Here is my maid Bilha, consort with her and she shall bear upon my knees, and I shall be built through her.
Jacob did not object. She gave him Bilha, her maidservant, as a wife, and Jacob consorted with her.
Bilha conceived and bore Jacob a son.
Rachel treated the child as her own son, and therefore was the one who named him. She said: God judged me [ dananni ] as to whether I am worthy of children, and also heard my voice, and gave me a son; therefore she called his name Dan.
Bilha, Rachel’s maidservant, conceived again, and bore Jacob a second son.
Rachel said: I engaged in a great struggle [ naftulei ] with my sister. I fought with her in a primal, mighty battle over children. And I also prevailed, as another son was born to me. She called his name Naphtali. Although these were not her biological children, Rachel treated them as her own.
Leah saw that she had ceased bearing after the birth of Judah; she took Zilpa her maidservant and gave her to Jacob as a wife.
Zilpa, Leah’s maidservant, bore Jacob a son.
Leah said: Fortune [ gad ] has come; she called his name Gad.
Zilpa, Leah’s maidservant, bore a second son to Jacob.
Leah said: In my happiness [ be’oshri ], as women will be happy for me and encourage and strengthen me. She called his name Asher.
Here the Torah relates a short story-within-a-story about Jacob’s growing family. Reuben, who was probably around four years old at the time, 11 went during the days of wheat harvest, found mandrakes in the field, and brought them as a gift to Leah, his mother. As her firstborn son, Reuben was very close to his mother, as indicated by the name she gave him. Rachel said to Leah: Please give me from your son’s mandrakes. While some commentaries maintain that mandrakes were a folk remedy for barrenness, it is more likely that Rachel wanted them for the same reason as Reuben, for their beauty and fragrance. 12
She, Leah, said to her: Is the taking of my husband insignificant? Is it not enough for you that you have taken my husband? Rachel had seized Jacob’s affections and attention. And you wish to take also my son’s mandrakes? Rachel said: Therefore, he shall lie with you tonight in exchange for your son’s mandrakes. Following the order apparently arranged between the women, that night was Rachel’s turn. Rachel suggested that she would give up Jacob for that night in exchange for the mandrakes, and Leah agreed.
For reasons of custom and modesty, each of the wives had their own tent. Jacob came home from the field in the evening. Leah came out to meet him before he turned to Rachel’s tent, and said: You will consort with me for I have hired you from my sister with my son’s mandrakes. He lay with her that night. Jacob accepted the agreement between his wives.
God heeded Leah, and she conceived, and after a time without bearing children, she bore Jacob a fifth son.
Leah said: God has given my reward [ sekhari ], that I gave my maidservant to my husband. She called his name Issachar. This name also alludes to Jacob’s hiring [ sekhira ] by Leah, but she explicitly emphasizes her reward from Heaven for giving Zilpa to her husband.
Leah conceived again and bore a sixth son to Jacob.
Leah said: God has granted me a fine gift; now my husband will reside with me [ yizbeleni ], and his main residence will be with me, because I bore him six sons. Whether or not she was informed in a vision that Jacob would have twelve sons, as claimed by one tradition, six is still a substantial number. She called his name Zebulun.
And then she bore a daughter, and she called her name Dina.
After so many births by Jacob’s other wives, and after Rachel had prayed extensively for children, God remembered Rachel, and God heeded her, and He opened her womb.
She conceived and bore a son, and said: God has removed [ asaf ] my disgrace.
She called his name Joseph, saying: May the Lord add [ yosef ] another son for me after Joseph. She did not choose the name Asaf, which would accord only with her earlier statement. The name Joseph alludes both to the removal of her disgrace and her wish for another son.
It was when Rachel bore Joseph, that Jacob said to Laban: I have stayed and worked with you for years; now release me, and I will go to my place and to my land.
Give me my wives and my children, those wives for whom I have worked for you, and I will go; for you know my labor that I performed for you. I have fulfilled all my obligations.
Laban said to him: If now I have found favor in your eyes, please, I have divined, in an effort to unearth the cause of my financial success, and I have discovered that the Lord has blessed me on your account.
He, Laban, said to Jacob: You yourself stipulate your wages for me, to which you feel you are entitled, and I will give it. Up to this point you worked in exchange for two wives, but now that I realize that you have brought me good luck, you may state any amount you wish.
He, Jacob, said to him: You know how I have served you, and how your livestock was with me.
For the little that you had before me has increased abundantly; and the Lord has blessed you on my account. Jacob confirms Laban’s statement, but stresses that one need not resort to the occult arts to understand why Laban’s affairs have been blessed since his arrival. 13 And now when shall I provide for my household as well? Apart from my wives and children I have nothing of my own, as I have worked all this time for you.
He, Laban, said to Jacob: What shall I give you? What do you want? Jacob said: You do not give me anything. Do not pay me with silver or the equivalent from your current possessions. If you will do this matter for me: I will return and work for you. I will herd your flock and keep it.
I will pass with you through all your flock today; remove from there, among the flock, every speckled and spotted lamb with brown patches. The color of most of the sheep in the region was white, but there would sometimes occur a sheep with patches on its skin. 14 And likewise, every brown lamb among the sheep that you find, and the spotted and speckled among the goats. Generally, goats are entirely black, but some have colorful patches. And it, all these unusual animals, if they should be born in the flock from now onward, after you have removed the ones currently there, shall be my wages.
Jacob suggested a way in which his wages could be set unambiguously, so that no arguments could arise. My honesty shall speak on my behalf on a future day, when you shall go over my wages before you: Upon paying me my wages you will know for certain that every one that is not speckled and spotted among the goats, and brown among the sheep is stolen with me.
Laban said: Indeed, if only it will be in accordance with your statement. Laban considered this an excellent offer, as there were relatively few animals of the types described by Jacob.
So that no more spotted or speckled sheep and goats would be born by interbreeding, he, Laban, removed that day the streaked, those which had various types of stripes in the area where the ankles are bound, and spotted older goats, and all the speckled and spotted birthing female goats, each goat that had white in it, and all the brown among the sheep, and gave them into the possession of his sons, in a distant location, so that they should not be mixed with Jacob’s flock.
He established a path of three days, a large distance for flock, between himself and Jacob. And Jacob herded the remaining flock of Laban elsewhere.
Jacob took for himself rods from trees, of fresh poplar, and almond, and plane; he peeled white streaks in them by removing some of the bark, thereby exposing the white of the tree that was in the rods.
He displayed the rods that he peeled in the receptacles of the water troughs from which the flocks would come to drink, facing the flocks, opposite the other sheep. This was the place where the flock was gathered together. And they, the flock, would come into heat to mate when they came to drink.
The flocks came into heat due to the rods, and the flocks gave birth to streaked, speckled, and spotted young.
And Jacob separated the lambs and he placed the faces of the flocks toward the streaked and all the brown in the flocks of Laban, meaning that he positioned these at the head of the flock, and he established for himself droves alone, and did not place them with the flocks of Laban. In accordance with the conditions set between them, these were Jacob’s droves.
And it was, whenever the strong flocks, the best animals, would come into heat, in that season, Jacob would place the rods before the eyes of the flocks at the troughs, to have them come into heat with the rods, when they saw them.
When the flocks were feeble and weak, when they were not in heat, he would not place them, the rods. Others interpret: When the sheep’s tails were not tied up and were in their natural state. 15 Thus the feeble sheep and goats, which were not in heat at the proper time, were for Laban and the strong, the best animals, which multiplied well, were for Jacob, who did not want to expend effort upon the weaker ones.
The man, Jacob, became exceedingly prosperous, and he had many flocks, and as he did not need them all, he bartered with them for other property, including maidservants and slaves, and camels and donkeys, and he became the head of a tribe.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 31
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 31 somebodySince Jacob was living near Laban’s family, he heard the words of Laban’s sons, saying: Jacob has taken everything that is our father’s, and from that which is our father’s he has accumulated all this wealth. Among themselves, Laban’s sons cast aspersions upon Jacob, contending that he had grown rich at their father’s expense.
Apparently, Laban himself also heard these accusations, as Jacob saw the countenance of Laban, and behold, it was not toward him as in the past. Even if Laban was not convinced by these claims, he became suspicious of Jacob and his behavior toward him indicated as much.
At this point, the Lord said to Jacob: Return to the land of your fathers, and to the land of your birth, and I will be with you. God instructed him to return, but did not specify when exactly he should do so.
Jacob sent and summoned Rachel and Leah to the field to his flocks, for a private discussion and consultation. He took them out to the field because he knew it would be an emotionally charged exchange. 16
He said to them: I see your father’s countenance and it is not toward me as in the past. His behavior toward me has changed. And the God of my father was with me.
And you know that with all my strength I have served your father.
But your father has cheated me, as he has not stood by our agreements, and changed the conditions of my wages ten times, amounting to numerous times. But even so, God did not allow him to harm me.
If he, Laban, said this: The speckled shall be your wages, that I would receive as my wages all the flock with that particular mark, then all the flocks bore speckled young, and I gained. And if he said that: The streaked shall be your wages, all the flocks bore streaked young. From Jacob’s statement, it is evident that Laban sought to change the contract between them time after time, but it eventually became clear that Jacob was blessed.
God has diverted the livestock of your father, and given it to me. It was God who transferred the animals from your father’s flock to my possession.
It was at the time that the flock was in heat, I lifted my eyes, and saw in a dream, and behold, the males that mounted and impregnated the flock were streaked, speckled, and mottled. They were a variety of mixed colors, even if that was not always the case in reality.
The angel of God said to me in the dream: Jacob, and I said: Here I am.
He said: Please lift your eyes, and see, all the males that mount the flock are streaked, speckled, and mottled for I have seen all that Laban is doing to you, and therefore I have come to help you. The vision in your dream will come true, and the animals that will be born will have patches and spots on their skin.
I am the God of your encounter in Beit El, where you anointed a monument with oil to sanctify it, and where you took a vow to Me, as described above (28:18–22). Now arise, leave this land, since it is time for you to fulfill your vow, and return to the land of your birth.
Jacob’s wives were more than willing to cooperate. Rachel and Leah answered and said to him: Is there still a share or inheritance for us in our father’s house? We feel no attachment to our father’s family.
Are we not considered foreigners by him, as he sold us for your service? It was not an ordinary marriage arrangement, in which lavish gifts are exchanged between the couple, but a business deal for him. And he also consumed our silver; he did not even give us part of that money, but appropriated it all for himself without the slightest hesitation.
As all the wealth that God salvaged from our father, it is for us and for our children. All the riches and property in your possession is ours and our children’s. And now, everything that God said to you, do. We are ready to leave our homeland and travel with you.
Jacob arose and placed his sons and his wives upon the camels.
He led all his livestock and all his property that he attained, his acquisitions that he acquired, which he attained in Padan Aram, to come to Isaac his father, to the land of Canaan.
The preparations for the journey were aided by the absence of Laban and his sons, as Laban went to shear his sheep. As stated earlier (30:36), Laban’s flock was purposely placed far from Jacob’s. Since the shearing of a whole flock of sheep takes several days, Jacob seized this opportunity. And Rachel stole the household idols that were her father’s. These might have been small idols in human form, used for sorcery. 17
Jacob deceived Laban the Aramean in that he did not tell him that he was fleeing. Jacob did not indicate by his statements or actions that he planned to leave.
He fled, he and all that he had, his descendants and possessions; and he arose and crossed the river, the Euphrates, then turned southwest and headed toward the highlands of Gilad. Jacob sought to return to Canaan by the easiest path, via the eastern bank of the Jordan River.
It was told to Laban on the third day after this departure that Jacob had fled.
He took his brethren, his close family members, with him, and pursued him a distance of seven days. He, Laban, reached him in the highlands of Gilad. He was able to cover such a distance in a shorter time than Jacob because he and his accomplices were not burdened with their families and livestock in their care. It is also likely that they rode upon animals.
God came to Laban the Aramean in a dream of the night, and He said to him: Beware lest you speak to Jacob from good, tempting, seductive offers, to bad statements, threats. Laban was not forbidden from talking to Jacob at all, but he had to refrain from pressuring him.
Laban caught up with Jacob. Jacob had pitched his tent in the highlands, Gilad, and Laban also pitched the tents of his brethren in the highlands of Gilad. The two encampments were close enough to each other for Laban to enter Jacob’s camp.
Laban said to Jacob: What did you do that you deceived me and led my daughters like captives of the sword? Laban might have realized that his daughters had not been taken against their will, but in his anger he was happy to fling accusations at Jacob. Since Laban viewed Jacob as the reason for his success (see 30:27), his sudden flight upset him.
Why did you flee surreptitiously and deceive me; and you did not tell me. Had you informed me, I would have sent you in a dignified, celebratory manner, with joy and with songs, with drum and with harp.
You did not allow me to kiss my sons, grandsons, and my daughters. Due to his dream, Laban initially sought to avoid threatening Jacob, and made do with a rebuke. Now you have acted foolishly. If you had made your intentions known, I would have respected your wishes.
Ultimately, Laban was unable to control himself and issued a threat. It is in my power, and in that of my men, to do you harm. But I refrained from doing so. Laban admitted: The God of your father said to me last night, saying: Beware of speaking with Jacob from good to bad.
And now, even if you have gone because you longed for your father’s house after a twenty-year absence and a lack of contact with your family, why did you steal my gods?
Jacob answered and said to Laban: With regard to your question as to why I fled, it was because I feared you, because I said: Lest you would rob your daughters from me. I was apprehensive that you would force me to leave alone, just as I arrived.
And as for the claim of stolen idols, with whomever you find your gods, he shall not live, but will be put to death. Before our brethren, identify what is with me; you may search my property, and if you find anything I have wrongfully taken, take it back for yourself. The word “brethren” refers to the members of Jacob’s family as well as Laban’s family, who he considered to be his own relatives, especially in light of Jacob’s lengthy stay in Haran. And his reaction was fierce denial, as Jacob did not know that Rachel stole them. Had he known, he would not have placed a curse on the thief, but would have promised to return the idols and perhaps compensate Laban. Jacob assumed that Laban came with false accusations, seeking an excuse to play the role of the offended party and clear himself of all suspicion.
Having received permission to conduct a search for any objects belonging to him, Laban came into Jacob’s tent, and into Leah’s tent, and into the tent of the two maidservants, but he did not find the idols; he emerged from Leah’s tent and came into Rachel’s tent. As stated earlier, Jacob’s wives each had their own tent. 18
Rachel took the household idols and placed them in the cushion of the camel. For a lengthy journey they would not merely place a small saddle on the camels, but a large, heavily padded cushion. Rachel put the idols under this cushion. And she sat upon them. Laban felt throughout the tent and did not find them.
Whether Rachel still desired to keep the idols, or if she now regretted taking them, she refused to admit the theft. She said to her father: Let my lord not be angry, as I cannot arise before you because the manner of women is upon me. I am menstruating, and it is hard for me to stand. Perhaps it was customary at the time to refrain from speaking with a woman during her menstruation period, or at least to converse with her as briefly as possible. 19 Therefore, Laban did not continue talking to her and did not ask her to rise. He searched in the other areas of the tent but did not find the household gods.
Convinced that there was no basis for the accusation of theft, Jacob felt dishonored by Laban’s intrusive search in his and his wives’ tents. Jacob was angry and quarreled with Laban. Jacob responded and said to Laban: What is my transgression, what is my sin that you have pursued after me?
For you felt all my vessels, what have you found of all the vessels of your household? If you discovered any object of yours, place it here before my brethren and your brethren. There are people here who know us both and who would recognize your property. And they will determine between the two of us. Jacob was not necessarily interested in negotiating, but in his anger he laid out his claims against his employer.
These twenty years I have been with you; your ewes and your female goats have not miscarried. Through all these years of service, your flocks were blessed. Jacob’s statement can also be interpreted as a claim that he had accepted all responsibility for such unfortunate occurrences, that he invariably paid for such deaths from his own pocket. And the rams of your flock I have not eaten.
I did not bring the remains of a mauled animal, one torn apart by wild beasts, to you with the claim that it was not my fault. The standard custom was that a shepherd was not held responsible for attacks of this kind. Even so, when an animal was mauled I bore its loss and would pay for it; from me you could demand it, whether stolen from me by day or stolen from me by night. Whether an item was stolen from me by day or night, I accepted responsibility for all damages.
Thus I was: When I shepherded your flock in the day dehydration consumed me, and the frost by night; and my sleep fled from my eyes, as I had to guard your property without respite.
These are twenty years for me in your house: I worked for you fourteen years for your two daughters, and six years for a portion of your flocks; and you changed my wages ten times, as Jacob had related to his wives (verse 7).
If the God of my father, the God of Abraham, and the Fear of Isaac, God, whom Isaac feared 20 had not been with me then, you would have sent me away now empty-handed. God saw my hardship and the faithful toil of my hands and proved it last night. When He spoke to you last night He confirmed the rightfulness of my claims.
Laban did not agree with Jacob’s argument, but rather reemphasized his own claim. Laban responded and said to Jacob: The girls, your wives, are my daughters, and the boys, their children , are my sons, and the flocks are my flocks, and everything that you see is mine. All that you have here you took from me, and therefore it is all my property. And to my daughters, what can I do to them today, or to their children whom they have borne? I cannot fight against them, as they are my daughters and grandchildren. In truth it is all mine, but I could not harm my family.
We shall shortly conclude our involvement with each other and will not see one another again. And now, for the sake of the future, come, let us establish a covenant, I and you; and let it be as a witness between me and you.
Jacob took a stone and established it as a commemorative monument.
Jacob said to his brethren, his sons, who were perhaps already strong enough to help, as well as his servants and the other members of his camp: Gather stones. And they took stones, and made a pile around the pillar, and they ate there on the pile, which was part of the ritual of establishing a covenant.
Laban called this pile Yegar Sahaduta, which in Laban’s language, ancient Aramaic, means “pile of testimony,” gal edut in Hebrew; 21 and Jacob called it Gal’ed.
As the head of the tribe, Laban gave an official speech and said: This pile is witness between me and you today. Therefore he called its name Gal’ed;
and the Mitzpa, the name of a nearby place, will also testify to the same, 22 as he, Laban, said: The Lord will observe [ yitzef ] between me and you, because we will be concealed one from another. Since we will no longer be able to see each other, God will watch over to ensure that all is conducted properly.
God will know if you shall afflict my daughters, or if you shall take more wives in addition to my daughters, thereby depriving them of their share. I cannot enforce your compliance with this commitment, as no man is with us to investigate and report back to me. Instead, see, God is witness between me and you.
Laban said to Jacob: Here is this pile and here is the monument that I have established between me and you . 23 Although it was not Laban who established the pillar or pile, he took credit for both.
This pile is witness, and the monument is witness, that I will not pass this pile to you, and that you shall not pass this pile and this monument to me, for harm. We may meet again in the future, but not as belligerents.
The God of Abraham, and the God of Nahor, and also the God of their father, shall judge between us. For Laban, the God of Abraham, the God of Nahor, and the God of Terah, are all one and the same. Jacob took an oath that he would uphold this agreement, by the Fear, the God, of his father Isaac.
Jacob slaughtered for a feast on the highland, and summoned his brethren to eat bread in a more celebratory feast than the previous meal, with the participation of all those present. They ate bread, and stayed the night on the highland.
Laban awoke early in the morning, and kissed his sons and his daughters and blessed them. The goodbyes of which he claimed to have been deprived in Haran he now issued at the mountains of Gilad. Laban went and returned to his place, with peaceful relations established between him and Jacob.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 32
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 32 somebodyAfter his final departure from Laban, Jacob went on his way with his camp from Gilad. He had a long way ahead of him to reach the house of his father, who was living in Beersheba or Hebron. And angels of God encountered him.
Jacob said when he saw them: These are not a mere few angels, but an entire camp; this is the camp [ mah · ] of God. Therefore, he called the name of that place Mahanayim, meaning “ two camps,” in reference to his camp and God’s camp. Mahanayim remained the name of a place located south of Gilad on the eastern side of the Jordan River. 24
To inform him of their impending meeting, Jacob sent messengers 1 before him to Esau his brother to the land of Se’ir, the field, region, 2 of Edom. The word for messengers, malakhim , can also mean angels. Some commentaries maintain that Jacob sent actual angels from the camp that he had just encountered. 3
He commanded them, saying: So shall you say to my lord, to Esau: So says your servant Jacob: I have resided with Laban, and tarried until now. Since Jacob wanted the messengers to understand the complexity of his relationship with Esau, he described himself as a servant addressing his master.
I have oxen, donkeys, flocks, slaves, and maidservants. I have become financially secure since we last met, and I do not need your support. I can even offer you assistance, if you wish. 4 And I have sent to tell my lord, so that I may find favor in your eyes, in the manner of loving brothers anticipating their reunion.
The messengers returned to Jacob, saying: We came to your brother, to Esau; moreover he is coming to meet you, and four hundred men are with him. Since this was a large battalion, Jacob suspected that it was not merely a guard of honor. Esau did not respond directly to the petition brought by the messengers; they simply observed him heading in Jacob’s direction.
Faced with Esau’s clear numerical advantage, Jacob was very frightened of the prospect of bloodshed, and furthermore he was distressed, as he had nothing against Esau personally. 5 Consequently, he prepared to defend himself and divided the people who were with him, including the slaves and maidservants, his comrades, and other people who had joined him due to his success in Haran, and the flocks, the cattle, and the camels, into two camps.
He said to his traveling companions, or to himself: If Esau will come to wage war upon the one camp, and smite it, we may not be capable of defending ourselves; however, at least the remaining camp will escape; it will be spared.
Jacob then prayed, and said: God of my father Abraham, and God of my father Isaac, Lord, who says to me: Return to your land, and to the land of your birth, and I will benefit you. I turn to You now because You commanded me to return home.
Despite the dangers he faces, Jacob begins his prayer with thanksgiving: I am unworthy of all the kindnesses and of all the truth that You have performed for Your servant; for with my staff alone I crossed this Jordan River when I fled from Canaan. I was by myself and I had nothing, and now I have become two camps. I am therefore grateful.
However, I am now in trouble: Deliver me please from the hand of my brother, from the hand of Esau; for I fear him, lest he come and smite me, mother and children alike. He is liable to kill all of us.
And You said in the vision of the ladder at Beit El: I will benefit you, and render your descendants as the sand of the sea, which cannot be enumerated for multitude. You promised to shield me, and I am now in need of Your protection.
He stayed there that night; he took from that which was in his possession a gift for Esau his brother:
Two hundred female goats and twenty male goats, two hundred ewes and twenty rams,
thirty nursing camels and their offspring, forty cows and ten bulls, twenty female donkeys and ten male donkeys. Of every species that Jacob sent, he included both males and females, so that they would be able to reproduce. This is also the reason for the various proportions between the males and females, as different ratios are more suitable for the reproduction of different animals. One can infer from the impressive size of the present that Jacob must have owned an enormous amount of livestock.
He placed them in the charge of his servants, each drove by itself, handled by a different cattle herder. And he, Jacob, said to his servants: Go ahead of me, to reach my brother before me, and make space between one drove and the other drove. The gift was spread out so that it would appear even more impressive to Esau.
He commanded the shepherd of the first herd, saying: When Esau my brother meets you, and asks you, saying: To whom do you belong, and where are you going, and whose are these animals before you?
You shall say: They are from your servant, Jacob; and as for this collection of animals, it is a gift sent to my lord, to Esau, and behold, he, Jacob, too, is behind us. He is sending you these gifts in anticipation of your meeting.
He commanded also the second, and also the third, and also all that followed the droves, saying: In this manner shall you speak to Esau when you find him. You shall tell him that you are Jacob’s servants, and that this entire herd is a gift to his lord, Esau.
You shall say: Moreover, here is your servant Jacob coming behind us to meet you. He is not running away, and there is no need to chase him. For he, Jacob, said to himself: I will appease him, Esau, with the gift that goes before me, and thereafter, when he has received the gift, I will see his face; perhaps he will favor me for what I have done for him.
The gift went before him, Jacob, for his inspection; and he stayed that night in the camp.
He, Jacob, arose during that night, after sending off the gifts, and he personally took his two wives, his two maidservants, and his eleven children, and crossed the ford of the Yabok. 1 The exact location of the ford is unknown, but there is still a stream called Yabok in central present-day Jordan, nowadays also called the Zarqa River. The river, which is not deep, can be crossed by foot.
He took them, and brought them over the stream, and brought over that which he had in order to meet Esau south of the Yabok River. Obviously, Jacob did not cross the river with all his wives, children of different ages, and his belongings all at once. Instead, he made the crossing several times.
Eventually, after the entire camp had crossed, Jacob remained alone on the riverbank; and a mysterious, unnamed man wrestled with him until dawn.
He, the man, saw that he could not prevail against him, and therefore he touched, struck, Jacob and injured the joint of his thigh; and the joint of Jacob’s thigh was dislocated as he wrestled with him. Despite the great pain, Jacob remained standing and refused to be defeated.
While the pair were grappling each other, he, the man, said: Release me, for the dawn has broken. I cannot remain here for I am a nocturnal being. Here the verse clearly indicates that the strange figure was a spiritual entity. Nevertheless, Jacob felt that he was capable of subduing him, and he said: I will not release you unless you bless me. Jacob demanded neither surrender nor apology, but submission, expressed in the form of a blessing. The stranger’s agreement to the request, and the bestowal of a blessing, would indicate his acceptance of Jacob.
He, the angel, said to him: What is your name? He said: Jacob. Had this been a normal conversation between people, Jacob presumably would have asked the figure why he attacked him if he was unaware of his identity. However, he understood that the angel knew his name, and his question was a ceremonial introduction to his blessing.
He, the angel, said: No more shall Jacob be said to be your name; rather, you shall be called Israel; for you have striven [ sarita ] with God [ elohim ], an angel, a supernatural force, and with men, and you have prevailed.
Jacob asked the angel and said: Tell me, please, your name, your essence or function. This request was not merely due to curiosity; rather, Jacob sought to clarify the meaning of the fight. Jacob did not know whether this angel represented Esau or his own alter-ego, and whether their confrontation was a trial from God or an actual threat from dark heavenly forces. He said: Why is it that you ask of my name? It is unnecessary for you to know my name. And he, the angel, blessed him there again.
Jacob named the place Peniel: For I have seen God face-to-face and my life was saved. Other people who saw angels expressed fear that they might perish. In the book of Judges, after Mano’ah and his wife encounter an angel, he says: “We will die, because we have seen God.” 6 Jacob, by contrast, knew that his life had been spared despite knowing for certain that he had met an angel face-to-face.
The angel left Jacob at daybreak. The sun then rose upon him as he passed Penuel, and he was limping on his thigh. Jacob was certainly shaken both by the encounter itself and from his injury.
At this juncture, the Torah inserts a legal statement: Therefore, the children of Israel do not eat the sciatic nerve, which is upon the joint of the thigh, the large nerve that extends along the entire thigh and leg all the way to the heel, to this day, because he touched the joint of Jacob’s thigh, at the sciatic nerve, a vulnerable area of the body. Due to Jacob’s injury, his descendants are prohibited from eating the sciatic nerve of animals throughout their generations.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 33
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 33 somebodyJacob had fought with a mysterious man until dawn. After sunrise, when people began to move about the camp, Jacob lifted his eyes and saw, and behold, Esau came, and with him four hundred men. Opposed to Jacob’s relatively small family camp, which included slaves, maidservants, and possessions, he saw a large military procession. He divided the children among Leah, Rachel, and the two maidservants. Jacob arranged his camp so that each mother could watch over her own children.
He placed the maidservants and their children first, Leah and her children next, and Rachel and Joseph last. Since Jacob was worried about Esau’s possibly hostile behavior, he positioned his family in the opposite order of their importance in his eyes. He placed the maidservants and their children in front, behind them Leah and her children, followed lastly by his most beloved wife, Rachel, and her son.
And he, Jacob, passed before them, his family members, and prostrated himself earthward seven times, which is a symbolic number, until his approach to his brother. This manner of approaching, by stopping for several prostrations, was an expression of honor and submission toward Esau, even before a word had passed between them.
Esau ran to meet him, embraced him, fell upon his neck, and kissed him; and they wept together.
He, Esau, lifted his eyes, saw the women and the children, walking behind Jacob, and said: Who are these to you? Although his brother could have guessed, he, Jacob, said: The children with whom God has graced your servant. These are my children. Jacob repeatedly referred to himself as Esau’s servant. He opted to flatter Esau in order to preserve their cordial relationship.
The maidservants approached, they and their children, and they prostrated themselves, following Jacob’s lead.
Leah, too, and her children approached, and prostrated themselves; and afterward Joseph and Rachel also approached, and prostrated themselves.
He, Esau, said: For whom do you intend this entire camp of flocks of sheep, cattle, camels, and the other animals, that I met? He, Jacob, said: To find favor in the eyes of my lord. I have brought you a gift of reconciliation, which I hope you will accept.
Esau said: I have plenty, my brother. I do not need your present. Esau was almost certainly speaking the truth, as he ruled over a small state. That which is yours shall be yours. Keep the gift for yourself.
Jacob said: Please, no, if I have found favor in your eyes, and we indeed have a good relationship, receive my gift from me, since the acceptance of a gift is an expression of kinship. For therefore, I have seen your face, as the sight of the face of angels. I consider you like a marvelous being, and you welcomed me. You are so noble in my eyes that it would be an honor for me for my gift to be accepted by you.
Please, take my gift that was brought to you. I realize that you do not need the present, but I am offering it to you anyway, as God has graced me, and because I have everything. I lose nothing by giving you this gift. Apparently, Esau did not realize the extent of Jacob’s wealth. He did not ask about Jacob’s whole camp and flocks, perhaps because Jacob had cautiously left them behind. He, Jacob, urged him, Esau, to accept his present, and he took it.
Ever since Esau’s anger and animosity toward Jacob had been aroused many years ago, Jacob had avoided this encounter. Nevertheless, Jacob’s gift and gestures of submission were sufficient to subdue Esau’s resentment and restore their brotherhood. He, Esau, said: We will travel, and we will go, and I will go along with you. Let us continue together on the same road, as you are my brother. From Jacob’s subsequent response it is apparent that he understood Esau’s comment as an invitation to visit him or even to live with him in the place where he ruled.
He, Jacob, said to him: My lord knows that the children are tender. You can see that the children are young. Reuben, Jacob’s firstborn son, was about thirteen years old at the time. And you know that the responsibilities of attending to the needs of the nursing flocks and cattle are upon me; if they drive them hard one day, all the flocks will die. With my large family and many sheep, I cannot keep up with your troops.
Please, my lord will pass before his servant. You go first, and I will advance slowly, according to the pace of the property that is before me and according to the pace of the children, until I will come to my lord to Se’ir. There is a long way ahead of us until we reach your land.
And Esau said: If so, please, I will place with you some of the people who are with me to protect you and your family. He, Jacob, said: Why do that? I will find favor in the eyes of my lord. I am independent; I have no need for such assistance. Furthermore, I do not wish to burden you by accepting this service.
Esau returned on that day with his entourage and the animals he had received on his way to Se’ir.
Jacob traveled to a location named Sukot, and built him a house, and established booths for his livestock. Therefore, he called the name of the place Sukot. This was a temporary lodging, where Jacob stayed until he decided upon his next destination.
Jacob came unharmed and without losses to the city of Shekhem, which is in the land of Canaan, upon his arrival from Padan Aram. He intended to make Shekhem his permanent residence. And he encamped before the city; not inside, but close enough to form a relationship with the local residents.
Since this was a populated area, it would have been inappropriate for Jacob to establish his residence on land that he did not own. Therefore, upon his arrival he purchased a tract of the field where he had pitched his tent, from the possession of the children of Hamor, father of Shekhem, who was the mayor of the city of Shekhem, for one hundred kesita, a certain sum of money. 7 Alternatively, kesita means sheep and the like.
He established there an altar, and called it El Elohei Israel, meaning the Strong God of Israel. 8 Naming an altar in this manner was not unusual, as they were not treated as mere instrumental structures, but were anthropomorphized, given a name and identity. The commentaries note that Moses similarly named an altar “The Lord Is My Standard” 9 and Jerusalem was called “The Lord Is There.” 10
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 34
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 34 somebodySince Jacob and his family were residing near the city of Shekhem, Dina, the young daughter of Leah, whom she bore to Jacob, went out to see the daughters of the land. Having lived until that point mostly as a nomad in the desert, Dina became acquainted for the first time with an urban environment, and she socialized with the local girls.
Shekhem, son of Hamor the Hivite, prince of the land, saw her and was attracted to this young foreign woman. He took her, and lay with her, and raped her.
Presumably, this was not the first woman whom Shekhem had abused in this manner, by taking advantage of his social status. However, on this occasion he did not abandon her afterward; rather, his soul was drawn to Dina, daughter of Jacob, and he loved the young woman, and furthermore he spoke soothingly to the young woman. Although Shekhem was certainly more powerful than the young woman, he wanted her to consent to marriage.
Shekhem spoke to his father Hamor, saying: Take for me this girl as a wife.
Jacob heard that he had defiled Dina his daughter. The news reached him at home, and his sons were with his livestock in the field; and Jacob kept silent. He did nothing about the matter until their arrival.
Meanwhile, Hamor, father of Shekhem, went out to Jacob to speak with him about the possibility of marriage. Were it not for the prior act of rape, there would have been nothing inappropriate about this proposal.
And the sons of Jacob came from the field immediately when they heard it; and the men were saddened over the pain and shame inflicted upon their sister, and furthermore they became very angry, as he, Shekhem, had performed an abomination in the family of Israel to lie with Jacob’s daughter; and so shall not be done to anyone, certainly not the daughter of an esteemed person.
Hamor, the prince of the land, spoke with them, saying: The soul of my son Shekhem longs for your daughter. Please, give her to him as a wife.
In addition to this marriage proposal, Hamor also suggests a political union; perhaps he sought to make amends with the girl’s father for his son’s misbehavior. And marry with us; give your daughters to us, and take our daughters for you. The individual engagement can become a collective one. We will form one family, or at least maintain very close relations.
And you shall live with us permanently; and the land shall be before you; live and trade in it. Use it as though it is your own land, for business or pleasure, and settle in it. So far you have managed to buy one small field in exchange for a large sum of money. Now I am offering you free residency, as well as commercial and social unification. Hamor, who was presumably sent by his son, ignored the appalling incident that led to this proposal, and with regard to the marriage he spoke like an ordinary man who wishes to set up his son with his neighbor’s daughter.
The young Shekhem did not wait to hear Jacob’s response from his father. Rather, he too came to their house and said to her father and to her brothers: Let me find favor in your eyes, and that which you shall say to me I will give. Unlike Hamor, who attempted to act within the bounds of decorum, Shekhem spoke out of passion.
Increase bridal payment and gift, and I will give in accordance with what you shall say to me. I will agree to pay any amount you see fit; and all I ask is that you give me the young woman as a wife.
Jacob himself did not respond. This might have been due to his grief over the incident, or he had possibly developed a passive personality over the years, perhaps as a result of his encounter with the angel. The sons of Jacob answered Shekhem and Hamor his father with guile, and spoke in their father’s name. They spoke with cunning, as he, Shekhem, had defiled Dina their sister. In contrast to Shekhem and Hamor, who ignored the rape and acted as though they were presenting a normal marriage proposal, Jacob’s sons emphasized the insult, so that the severity of the harm would be taken into account in the subsequent agreement.
The malicious guile in their response lies in the following suggestion. They said to them: We cannot do this thing, to give our sister to a man who has a foreskin, as in our eyes the uncircumcised state is not merely a physical matter, but it is a disgrace for us . 11 Therefore, it is impossible to speak of marriage at this stage.
Only with this will we accede to you: If you become like us to have every male among you circumcised. Since it is a disgrace for us to be uncircumcised, we cannot become like you. Consequently, you must agree to become similar to us.
We will give our daughters to you, and we will take your daughters for us, and we will live with you, and we will become one people.
If you do not heed us, to be circumcised, we will take our daughter home, and we will go. Since the brothers are speaking in their father’s name, they call Dina their daughter. 12
Their statement was favorable in the eyes of Hamor, and in the eyes of Shekhem son of Hamor. They concluded from the response of Jacob’s sons that their proposal had been accepted on the condition that they circumcise themselves.
The lad did not tarry to perform the matter, because he desired Jacob’s daughter. And he was more respected than all the house of his father. It would seem that Shekhem was the firstborn, his father’s heir.
Hamor and Shekhem his son came to the gate of their city. Generally, behind the gate of a city there was a square, where its important residents would convene. 13 And they spoke with the men of their city, presenting the deal to them. They omitted Shekhem’s love for Dina, which did not concern the city residents, and which would certainly not have helped convince them to undertake such an extreme measure as circumcision. Rather, they laid out before them only the political and commercial elements of the deal, saying:
These men are peaceful with us, and it is beneficial for us that they will live in the land and trade in it; behold, the land is spacious before them. Shekhem was a small city at the time, surrounded by large tracts of land, so there was plenty of room for everybody. Their daughters we will take as wives for us, and our daughters we will give to them. In a rhetorically persuasive tactic, Hamor and Shekhem adjusted their proposal to Jacob, in which they said: Give your daughters to us, and take our daughters for you (verse 9). It can be inferred from their original statement that Jacob’s family would have the discretion with regard to proposals of intermarriage, whereas here they indicate that the residents of Shekhem would have the choice. 14
Only with this condition will the men accede to us, to live with us, to become one people, with every male being circumcised, as they are circumcised. There should be no such clear physical distinction between the two populations.
Aren’t their livestock and their property and all their animals ours? We will devour them economically and culturally, and we will thereby enrich ourselves. We only must accede to them, and they will live with us. This ethnic and economic merge does not require us to pay a heavy price; all it takes is the fulfillment of one small condition.
All who emerged from the gate of his city heeded Hamor and Shekhem his son; every male, all who emerged from the gate of his city, was circumcised. In several cultures, males are circumcised in adulthood; however, this is an uncomfortable and even painful operation, far more so than when performed upon infants.
It was on the third day, when they were in so much pain that they could not leave their homes. Although the pain did not paralyze them, it limited their ability to move and act. The two sons of Jacob, Simeon and Levi, Dina’s brothers, each man took his sword. These brothers took the initiative because they had a special relationship with Dina, who was their maternal as well as their paternal sister. It is unclear why their elder brother Reuben did not participate. And they came upon the city confidently, as its residents were not prepared to have to defend themselves against Jacob’s family, with whom they were expecting to unite. Furthermore, the recently circumcised men were limited in their physical capabilities. Simeon and Levi went from house to house and killed all the males.
And they killed Hamor and Shekhem his son by sword. Their death was apparently more conspicuous than that of the other men; perhaps they were beheaded in the formal manner of an execution. Throughout this entire episode, Dina had remained imprisoned in Shekhem’s house; she was possibly granted the status of a future bride. And now, Simeon and Levi took Dina from the house of Shekhem and departed.
Then the other sons of Jacob, who did not participate in the killing, 15 beset the slain to take their valuables and looted the city, with the justification that its residents had defiled their sister. Even if the other men had not actively assisted in the rape, they were rendered passive accomplices by their failure to stop Shekhem. 16 After all, he did not seduce her gently, but took her by force from the group of girls with whom she was socializing, presumably in public.
They took their flocks, their cattle, and their donkeys, and that which was in the city and that which was in the field.
And all their wealth, and all their offspring, their little children, and their wives, they took captive and looted, and everything that was in the house. As in war, they took captives and plundered the property.
Jacob said to Simeon and Levi: Until now I was considered clean and acceptable, but now you have sullied me, to render me loathsome to the inhabitants of the land, the Canaanites and the Perizites. I am few in number. Since we are foreigners and we have attacked one of the Canaanite nations, the neighboring population might try to avenge the destruction of Shekhem, or seek to deter us from behaving in like manner toward other cities. To this end they will mobilize against me and smite me, and I and my household shall be destroyed.
They, the two sons, said: Shall he render our sister as a harlot? Simeon and Levi argue that the marriage proposal presented by Hamor and Shekhem was disingenuous. They refused to come to terms with the treatment of their sister as merchandise in a financial deal.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 35
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 35 somebodyGod said to Jacob: Arise, ascend to Beit El, and settle there; and make there an altar to the God who appeared to you when you fled from Esau your brother.
Jacob said to his household and to all who were with him, including his slaves and maidservants: Remove the foreign gods that are in your midst that were looted from Shekhem or belonged to people who accompanied their camp. And furthermore, purify yourselves by immersion in water and change your garments.
And we will arise and ascend to Beit El; and I will make there an altar to the God who answers me on the day of my distress. He was with me on the path upon which I went.
They indeed gave to Jacob all the foreign gods that were in their possession, and even the rings that were in their ears, hich were not actually objects of idol worship but some of which were decorated with such articles. Alternatively, this is referring to the rings that were in the ears of the idols. 17 And Jacob interred them beneath the terebinth tree that is near Shekhem.
They traveled; and despite Jacob’s fear that the cities surrounding Shekhem might try to avenge the deaths of the people of Shekhem, nevertheless, the dread of God, an inexplicable sensation of alarm, was upon the cities that were surrounding them, and they did not pursue after the sons of Jacob. There were also sound logical reasons for the hesitation of the neighboring cities: They did not know the size of Jacob’s camp, and when they heard that two of his sons had destroyed Shekhem, the residents were afraid of them. Presumably, the residents were not aware of the entire background of the event. Furthermore, it may be assumed that the relationships between different cities were weak, as their residents were not from the same nation. Consequently, many of these local inhabitants were certainly indifferent to the affair, and chose to refrain from getting involved in a matter that was not their concern.
Jacob came to Luz, which is in the land of Canaan, it is Beit El, he and all the people who were with him.
He erected there an altar, and he called the place of the altar 18 El Beit El, the God of Beit El. El is the name by which God identified Himself to Jacob in Haran. 19 Jacob called the place by this name because it was there that God was revealed to him when he fled from his brother.
The Torah relates incidentally that Deborah, Rebecca’s nurse, died. Deborah was clearly very old at the time, as many years had passed since she had accompanied Rebecca from Haran to the land of Canaan. As Rebecca’s lifelong associate, she had a higher status in the family than that of the other maidservants and was therefore accorded respect and treated with great affection. And she was buried below the hill upon which Beit El was located, beneath the oak tree that stood there; and he called its name Alon Bakhut, Tree of Weeping, as a sign of mourning for her.
God appeared to Jacob again, already upon his arrival from Padan Aram, and He blessed him. God appeared to him in Beit El, in the same location as when he left for Haran.
God said to him: Your name is currently Jacob. However, your name shall no longer be called Jacob; rather, Israel shall be your name; and He called his name Israel. Although Jacob had already been informed of the change of his name (32:29), at that stage he had heard it only from an angel, and in the context of a struggle. Now, the new name is confirmed by God Himself. Similarly, Ishmael’s name was originally announced before his birth by an angel (16:11) and was later given to him officially (16:15).
God said to him: I am God Almighty. This name alludes to God’s might and His power to grant offspring. Be fruitful and multiply; a nation and an assembly of nations shall be from you, and kings shall emerge from your loins. Your offspring will merit greatness.
And the land that I gave to Abraham and Isaac, I will give it to you, and to your descendants after you I will give the land.
God ascended from upon him in the place that He spoke with him.
Apparently, Jacob did not sacrifice an offering as soon as he reached Beit El, but only after he had stayed there a while. Jacob established a monument in the place that He spoke with him, a monument of stone, and he poured out a libation of wine upon it , 20 and poured oil upon it in commemoration of this further revelation.
Jacob again called the name of the place where God had spoken with him Beit El, to reiterate that the place was a house of God where the Divine Presence rested (see 28:17–22). The city of Beersheba is likewise named twice. 21
They traveled south from Beit El; and it was still some distance 22 to when they would arrive at the city of Efrat; and Rachel was in childbirth, and she had difficulty in her childbirth.
It was as she was having difficulty in her childbirth, that the midwife said to her: Fear not, for this too is a son for you.
It was with the departure of her soul, for she was dying in childbirth, that she called his name Ben Oni, son of my pain and anguish. And yet his father did not wish to call him by that name. Instead, he chose to interpret his wife’s statement in a positive manner, that oni meant my might, rather than my anguish. He therefore called him Benjamin, the right-hand son, or the strong son. 23
Rachel died, and she was buried on the path to Efrat, it is Bethlehem. Had Rachel given birth in a populated area, people might have been able to help her. However, she died on the road, and Jacob buried her there rather than in the city.
Jacob established a monument upon her grave; it is the monument of Rachel’s grave until today. This monument lasted for many generations. Although its appearance possibly changed over the course of time, it remained standing and is mentioned elsewhere. 24
Israel traveled, and pitched his tent beyond Migdal Eder, south of Bethlehem. 25
It was when Israel dwelled in that land, Canaan, on his way to his father’s home, that Reuben went and lay with Bilha, his father’s concubine. The fact that the verse calls her a concubine might be a reflection of Reuben’s opinion, as he perhaps did not consider Bilha, who was presumably younger than his mother, his father’s legal wife. And Israel heard. Although he was clearly distressed and humiliated by this deed, Jacob chose not to react immediately. Only on his deathbed did he respond by cursing Reuben (49:3–4). The verse concludes: The sons of Jacob were twelve. Jacob did not banish his sinful son; he continued to be counted among his sons.
The chapter lists all of Jacob’s sons. The sons of Leah were Reuben, who is still Jacob’s firstborn, although on his deathbed Jacob will dismiss him from this status, and Simeon, Levi, Judah, Issachar, and Zebulun.
The sons of Rachel were Joseph and Benjamin.
The sons of Bilha, Rachel’s maidservant, were Dan and Naftali.
And the sons of Zilpa, Leah’s maidservant, were Gad and Asher. These are the sons of Jacob, who were born to him in Padan Aram, apart from Benjamin, who was born in the land of Canaan.
Jacob continued southward and came to Isaac his father at Mamre, Kiryat Ha’arba, which is Hebron, where Abraham and Isaac resided. The verse records Jacob’s return to his father’s home, but relates nothing about their reunion or any events that transpired in Isaac’s last years.
The days of Isaac were one hundred years and eighty years.
Isaac expired, and he died, and he was gathered to his people. When a person passes away, he returns, as it were, to the souls of his parents and family. Isaac died old and full of days; he had reached a very advanced age. Esau and Jacob his sons buried him. Esau came from the land of Se’ir to bury his father together with Jacob, in the Cave of Makhpela in Hebron.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 36
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 36 somebodyThese are the descendants of Esau who is Edom. As mentioned earlier, Esau was nicknamed Edom after the red [ adom ] stew he requested from Jacob (25:25–30). Presumably, the name was also due to his red hair.
Esau took his wives from the daughters of Canaan, as stated above (26:34–35): Ada, daughter of Eilon the Hitite, and Oholivama, daughter of Ana, daughter of Tzivon the Hivite.
After marrying two Canaanite women, Esau subsequently acquiesced to his parents’ desire that he take a wife from the family, and he married his cousin Basmat, daughter of Ishmael, sister of Nevayot.
Ada bore Elifaz to Esau, his firstborn son; and Basmat bore Re’uel;
and Oholivama bore Yeush, Ya’elam, and Korah; these are the sons of Esau, who were born to him while he still lived in the land of Canaan.
However, Esau subsequently took his wives, his sons, his daughters, all the members of his household, his livestock, all his animals, and all his possessions that he had acquired in the land of Canaan, and went to a land, a different region, due to his brother Jacob,
because their property was too great for living together, and the land of their residence could not support them due to their livestock. Although Isaac was a farmer, his two sons were shepherds. Since both were successful and owned large herds, they were compelled to live far from each other.
Esau settled on Mount Se’ir; Esau who is Edom, and consequently his descendants are called Edomites.
And this is the legacy of Esau, father of Edom on Mount Se’ir.
These are the names of all of Esau’s sons, those who were born in Canaan and those born in Se’ir: Elifaz, son of Ada, wife of Esau; Re’uel, son of Basmat, wife of Esau.
The sons of Elifaz were Teman, Omar, Tzefo, and Gatam, and Kenaz.
And Timna, who was probably from a local ruling family, was a concubine of Elifaz son of Esau and she bore Amalek to Elifaz. These are the sons of Ada, wife of Esau.
And these are the sons of Re’uel: Nahat, and Zerah, Shama, and Mitza; these were the sons of Basmat, wife of Esau.
And these were the sons of Oholivama, daughter of Ana, daughter of Tzivon, Esau’s wife. It is clarified below that Oholivama was a native of Se’ir (verses 20–25), from the nation that lived there before Esau’s arrival. It may be suggested that Esau went there due to this marriage, and on account of this wife he claimed ownership of land on Mount Se’ir. She bore to Esau Yeush, Ya’elam, and Korah.
These are the chieftains, the petty rulers of the various tribes that descended from the sons of Esau, who did not lose their status even after the kingdom of Edom was established: The chieftains of the sons of Elifaz, firstborn of Esau, were the chieftain of Teman, the chieftain of Omar, the chieftain of Tzefo, the chieftain of Kenaz, his aforementioned sons (verse 11). As the families grew, each of them was headed by a chief. The name of the patriarch of the family, who was their first chieftain, subsequently became the name of the entire family, e.g., the governor of Teman’s descendants was referred to as the chieftain of Teman.
The chieftain of Korah, the chieftain of Gatam, the chieftain of Amalek. These are the chieftains of Elifaz in the land of Edom. These are the sons of Ada.
And these are the sons of Re’uel son of Esau: The chieftain of Nahat, the chieftain of Zerah, the chieftain of Shama, the chieftain of Mitza; these are the chieftains of Re’uel in the land of Edom, these are the sons of Basmat, wife of Esau.
And these are the sons of Oholivama, wife of Esau: The chieftain of Yeush, the chieftain of Ya’elam, the chieftain of Korah; these are the chieftains of Oholivama, daughter of Ana, wife of Esau.
These are the sons of Esau, and these are their chieftains; he is Edom.
These are the sons of Se’ir the Horite, the original inhabitants of the land. Alongside the Edomite rulers, the native rulers retained a measure of authority: Lotan, Shoval, Tzivon, Ana,
Dishon, Ezer, and Dishan; these are the chieftains of the Horites, sons of Se’ir in the land of Edom. This is referring either to actual Horite chieftains who retained their chiefdom to some degree after Esau’s family came into power, or to Edomite chieftains who adopted this title from the Horites.
The children of Lotan were Hori and Hemam; and Lotan’s sister was Timna, the concubine of Elifaz, son of Esau (verse 12). Timna, Amalek’s mother, is one of the few women mentioned in this section.
And these are the children of Shoval: Alvan, and Manahat, and Eval, Shepho, and Onam.
And these are the children of Tzivon: Aya and Ana; he is Ana, who found the Yemim in the wilderness. The word yemim is either the name of a nation that descended from primeval giants, 26 or it means mules. 27 As he was herding the donkeys of Tzivon his father. The significance of this incident depends on the interpretation of the word yemim . If Yemim are giants, the likely explanation is that they tried to steal the donkeys, and Ana stood up to them bravely, for which he became renowned. If they are mules, the statement that Ana found the yemim means that he invented them by crossbreeding donkeys and horses, either intentionally or by accident. The verse notes that this happened while he was herding donkeys.
And these are the children of Ana: Dishon and a girl, Oholivama, daughter of Ana. She is mentioned because she was Esau’s wife. 28
And these are the children of Dishon: Hemdan, Eshban, Yitran, and Keran.
These are the children of Ezer: Bilhan, Zaavan, and Akan.
These are the children of Dishan: Utz and Aran. The name Utz also appears in the list of the sons of Aram (10:23). Consequently, it is uncertain whether the land of Utz belonged to the Arameans or Edomites. 29
These are the chieftains of the Horites: the chieftain of Lotan, the chieftain of Shoval, the chieftain of Tzivon, the chieftain of Ana,
the chieftain of Dishon, the chieftain of Ezer, the chieftain of Dishan; these are the chieftains of the Horites, according to their chieftains in the land of Se’ir.
Thus far, the chapter has listed the chieftains of the Edomite and Horite tribes. When kings began to rule in Edom, the system of government became more centralized. And these are the kings who reigned in the land of Edom, before the reign of a king for the children of Israel. During the years when Esau’s descendants developed as an independent nation with a central government, Jacob’s children were in exile in Egypt and could not appoint a king over themselves. It is possible that the Israelite king to which the verse alludes is Moses, who led the entire Jewish nation. It is similarly stated: “He became king in Yeshurun, when the heads of the people were assembled, the tribes of Israel together.” 30
Bela son of Beor reigned in Edom. Due to the similarity between their names, some commentaries identify this ruler with Bilam son of Beor. 31 However, the context and chronology suggest otherwise. 32 And the name of his city was Dinhava. The mention of these kings’ cities indicates that they did not inherit the throne from one another, in the manner of a dynasty. 33
Bela died, and Yovav son of Zerah, of Botzra, another city in Edom, reigned in his stead.
Yovav died, and Husham of the land of the Temanites reigned in his stead. Teman was one of the Edomite chieftains mentioned above (verse 15).
Husham died, and Hadad son of Bedad, who had one notable accomplishment in that he smote Midyan, a mainly nomadic tribe that had settled temporarily near Edom and Moav, in the field of Moav, was the king who reigned in his stead. And the name of his city was Avit.
Hadad died, and Samla of Masreka reigned in his stead.
Samla died, and Shaul of Rehovot on the Euphrates river reigned in his stead.
Shaul died, and Baal Hanan son of Akhbor reigned in his stead.
And Baal Hanan son of Akhbor died, and Hadar reigned in his stead, and the name of the city was Pa’u; and his wife’s name was Mehetavel, daughter of Matred, daughter of Mei Zahav. It is unclear why the name of his wife and her lineage are mentioned here. Mei Zahav is either simply a name without any particular significance, a title meaning goldsmith, 34 or an epithet for a very rich person. Perhaps the wealth of Mehetavel’s grandfather enabled Hadad to stabilize his reign.
And these are the names of the chieftains of Esau, according to their families, according to their places, by their names, as the chieftains of Esau’s descendants ruled in different areas. The chieftain of Timna, the chieftain of Alva, the chieftain of Yetet. Some of these names were already mentioned above, but there are some differences here. For example, the name Timna did not appear earlier as a man’s name. 35
The chieftain of Oholivama; although this is the name of one of Esau’s wives, perhaps the entire tribe or its chieftain was named after her. The chieftain of Ela, the chieftain of Pinon,
the chieftain of Kenaz, the chieftain of Teman, the chieftain of Mivtzar,
the chieftain of Magdiel, the chieftain of Iram. These are the chieftains of Edom, according to their settlements in their apportioned land. He is Esau, father of Edom.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 37
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 37 somebodyUnlike Esau, who left Canaan to settle on Mount Se’ir, Jacob settled, while his father was still alive, in the land of his father’s residence, in the land of Canaan.
This is the legacy of Jacob. Although Jacob remained active upon his return to Canaan, his contributions as a leader and builder started to decrease. Therefore the narrative shifts its primary focus to Joseph. Joseph, seventeen years old, was herding the flock of his household with his brothers, thereby continuing the traditional occupation of their family (see 46:32). And he was a lad, or assistant, with the sons of Bilha, and with the sons of Zilpa, his father’s wives. Jacob himself gave no indication that the sons of the maidservants, Bilha and Zilpa, were of lesser status than the sons of Leah and Rachel. On the contrary, when Jacob blessed his sons, he equated the status of all of them (see 49:16). In practice, however, a disparity existed between them. Joseph became close to the sons of Bilha and Zilpa because he was closer in age to them. Yet Joseph brought evil report of them to their father, slandering their inappropriate behavior. 1
Israel, Jacob, loved Joseph more than all his sons, because he was a son of his old age [ ben zekunim ]. Although Benjamin was even younger than Joseph, and also a son of Jacob’s beloved wife Rachel, his personality was less prominent. Jacob favored Joseph due to his outstanding personality, which becomes apparent in the continuation of the narrative. In fact, Onkelos translates ben zekunim as a wise son. Additionally, Joseph resembled Jacob’s beloved wife Rachel, who had recently died. The verse describes Joseph as being “of fine form, and of fair appearance,” just like his mother (29:17, 39:6). Indeed, Joseph is the only male to be described in such terms by the Torah. Perhaps Joseph’s facial features reminded Jacob of Rachel. It is also easy to imagine that Joseph was preferred over Jacob’s older children because of their problematic behavior: Reuven defiled the family, and Simeon and Levi’s actions in Shekhem were met with Jacob’s disapproval. He, Jacob, made him a fine tunic, a special garment that was distinct from the clothing of the other brothers.
His brothers saw that their father loved him more than all his brothers. Jacob’s preference for Joseph was conspicuous, whether through the way he related to Joseph or from the special tunic that he made for him. And they hated him, and could not speak peaceably to him. They were incapable of maintaining any sort of peaceful dialogue with Joseph. They avoided all conversation with him and distanced themselves from him as much as possible.
Joseph dreamed a dream, and he told it to his brothers, and they hated him even more. Their hatred of Joseph increased because he related to them the details of his dream.
He said to them: Please, hear this dream that I dreamed:
Behold, we were binding sheaves in the field, as we normally do. Although the sons of Jacob were primarily shepherds, they also owned fields. And behold, instead of resting alongside the other sheaves, my sheaf arose, and also stood upright; and behold, your sheaves gathered around, and prostrated themselves to my sheaf.
His brothers, who understood the dream as a metaphor suggesting Joseph’s dominance over them, said to him: Will you reign over us? Will you have dominion over us? There is no chance for that. They hated him even more for his dreams, and for his words. The brother’s hatred of Joseph, which stemmed from his status as favorite son and from the negative reports about them that he would bring to Jacob, was further intensified by the arrogance he expressed through his dreams. Now, in addition to dealing with the fact that Joseph was favored by Jacob, the brothers must contend with a person who entertained megalomaniacal aspirations.
He dreamed yet another dream, presumably on another night, 2 and he related it to his brothers. He said: Behold, I dreamed another dream, and behold, the sun, the moon, and eleven stars prostrated themselves to me.
He related it to his father and to his brothers. Unlike in the first dream, Jacob is represented in this dream. For this reason, Joseph also related the dream to his father. 3 And his father rebuked him, and said to him: What is this dream that you dreamed? This is certainly not a meaningful dream. Considering that the sun and the moon are metaphors for one’s parents, will I and your mother and your brothers come to prostrate ourselves to you to the earth? Surely we will not. Your mother is already dead.
His brothers envied him, whether on account of his abnormal dreams, or because of their father’s relatively mild response. Unlike Joseph’s brothers, Jacob did not rebuke Joseph for expressing undeserved arrogance; he claimed only that the dream could never come to fruition. But his father kept the matter in mind. Despite his stated assertion that Joseph’s dreams were mere fantasy, Jacob kept them in mind, as he believed that there was some significance to them.
His brothers went to herd their father’s flock in Shekhem.
Israel said to Joseph: Aren’t your brothers herding in Shekhem? Go, and I will send you to them. It is normal for a flock to spend weeks or even months outside its pen. Jacob wished to maintain contact with his sons, who had wandered with the flock all the way from Hebron to Shekhem. He, Joseph, said to him: Here I am.
He said to him: Go now, see the status of your brothers and the status of the flock and bring back word. He sent him from the Valley of Hebron. Although Hebron itself is situated on mountainous terrain, it is possible that Jacob’s family dwelled in the valley below. Alternatively, the family lived in Hebron itself, but Jacob accompanied his son until they reached the valley, at which point Jacob sent Joseph on his own. 4 And he, Joseph, came to Shekhem.
A man found him, and behold, he was wandering in the field. Despite the fact that Joseph was seeking an entire group of shepherds herding a large flock, he could not locate them. The man asked him, saying: What do you seek?
He said: I seek my brothers. Please tell me where they are herding. Joseph undoubtedly described their appearances to the man.
The man said: They traveled from here; for I heard them saying to each other: We shall go to Dotan, and it is likely that they arrived there. Joseph went after his brothers, and he found them in Dotan.
They saw him from afar, and he was alone and likely in an isolated place, and before he approached them, they conspired against him to kill him. Their hatred of Joseph was so intense that once they encountered him alone and outside their father’s home, they were stirred to rid themselves of him.
They said one to another: Here comes that dreamer. Joseph’s dreams caused the brothers’ hatred toward him to intensify. By mockingly referring to Joseph as “that dreamer,” the brothers expressed their deep animosity toward him. Furthermore, the word “that” indicates that the brothers viewed Joseph as a hostile stranger, and not as their brother.
Now let us go and kill him and cast him into one of the nearby pits, and we will say: A wild beast devoured him. Since wild animals are commonly found in uninhabited areas, if someone inquires about the fate of Joseph, we will claim that his death was caused by a predatory animal in the area. And we shall see what will become of his dreams.
Reuben, the oldest son, heard, and delivered him from their hand, as he felt responsible for whatever was about to take place; and he said: Let us not smite him mortally; there is no need for us to kill him.
Reuben said to them: Do not shed blood; cast him into this pit that is in the wilderness, but do not lay a hand on him. Left alone, he will die of starvation; there is no need for us to kill him with our own hands. The verse points out that Reuben suggested this course of action only in order to deliver him from their hand, to restore him to his father. Perhaps Reuben did not join his brothers in their hatred of Joseph, and he therefore urged the brothers not to murder Joseph. He then attempted to convince them to cast Joseph into a pit, with the intention to later return and extract Joseph from the pit and bring him home. 5
It was when Joseph came to his brothers that they stripped Joseph of his tunic, the fine tunic that was upon him.
They took him and cast him into the pit; and the pit was empty, there was no water in it. It is not known during which season this event transpired. However, given that the brothers had gone out to pasture their flocks, it would seem that this incident occurred at the beginning of the summer, at the very latest. During this time of year, it is still possible to find pits filled with rainwater. Nevertheless, the brothers refrained from drowning Joseph in such a pit. 6
They sat to eat bread. The brothers saw no fault in their actions, nor did they consider their actions something done in a moment of weakness. Their consciences did not prevent them from sitting down for a meal while their brother cried out from the pit. 7 And they lifted their eyes and saw, and behold, a caravan of Ishmaelites was coming from Gilad on the eastern side of the Jordan River. Until recent times, it was common practice for those traveling from the north down to Egypt, to cross the Jordan River and continue through the Dotan Valley, which borders the Yizre’el Valley, and then on toward the coastal plain. And their camels were bearing various spices [ nekhot ] ; 8 alternatively, nekhot refers to a specific spice. They were also bearing balm, a very valuable spice, and labdanum, a plant used for manufacturing perfume. The caravan was going to take them, these spices, down to Egypt to sell them there .
Judah said to his brothers: What profit is it, what would we gain, 9 if we kill our brother and conceal his blood?
Go and we will sell him as a slave to the arriving Ishmaelites. They will take him far away from here, and at the very least, let our hand not be directly upon him, as after all, he is our brother, our flesh, and we should not harm him. His brothers heeded Judah’s suggestion.
Midyanite men, merchants, passed by, and they pulled and lifted Joseph from the pit. Some commentaries identify the Midyanite merchants with the group of Ishmaelites mentioned previously. The name “Midyanite” can refer generally to nomadic merchants. 10 Others explain that the Midyanites and Ishmaelites were two distinct groups. 11 They sold Joseph to the Ishmaelites. If the Midyanites are not identified with the Ishmaelites, then the brothers sold Joseph to the Ishmaelites who subsequently sold him to the Midyanites. 12 According to another interpretation, the brothers did not actually sell Joseph, and may even have been unaware of the sale; rather, the Midyanites came along while the brothers were eating, extracted him from the pit and sold him to the Ishmaelites. A third possibility is that the brothers had the Midyanites extract Joseph from the pit, and then the brothers themselves sold Joseph. 13 Joseph was sold for twenty silver pieces, a considerable amount, that they divided among themselves. According to the prophet Amos, it was enough for each of them to buy a pair of shoes; 14 and they brought Joseph to Egypt.
Reuben returned to the pit. Evidently, Reuben was not present at the time of the sale. And behold, Joseph was not in the pit; he rent his garments due to his concern regarding Joseph’s fate.
He returned to his brothers, and said: The boy is not there; and I, where do I go? What will happen to me? As the oldest brother, Reuben felt that the responsibility for Joseph rested on his shoulders.
Selling one’s own brother is an especially egregious act. By Torah law, kidnapping and selling any member of Israel into slavery, let alone one’s relative, is a capital offense. The brothers therefore sought to prepare a cover story for Joseph’s disappearance: They took Joseph’s tunic, slaughtered a goat, whose blood resembles human blood, and dipped the tunic in the blood of the goat.
They sent the fine tunic to Jacob, and they brought it to their father and they said: We found this. Identify now: Is it your son’s tunic or not? Clearly this is a fine tunic, but is it Joseph’s? We never paid attention to the details of his tunic, but since you made it, you must recognize it.
He identified it, and said: This is my son’s tunic; clearly an evil beast devoured him; Joseph was mauled. The brothers told Jacob that they discovered only the tunic. They found no traces of Joseph’s body, as the wild beast would have dragged it to its lair. Since the animal would not consume the tunic, it was left and therefore recovered.
Jacob rent his garments in mourning, placed sackcloth on his loins, and mourned his son many days.
All his sons and all his daughters arose to console him; but he refused to be consoled despite the efforts of those around him. He said: Nothing will change the present reality; for I will descend mourning to the grave, to my son. His father wept for him. Although Jacob did not have absolute proof that Joseph died as his body was not recovered, there was significant circumstantial evidence that Joseph was mauled.
The verse turns its focus back to Joseph: The Midyanites, [ medanim ] , 15 sold him, Joseph, to Egypt as a slave to Potifar, who was a courtier [ seris ] of Pharaoh. Although seris literally refers to a eunuch, this is not necessarily its meaning in the verse. Rather, the verse uses it to refer to an officer with a position in the royal palace. 16 Potifar was the chief executioner . 17 It is likely that Joseph was considered quality merchandise. He was of fine form, only seventeen years old, and his health had never been strained by hard work. He would have been sold only to a wealthy individual who could afford Joseph’s worth.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 38
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 38 somebodyIt was at that time; Judah descended from his brothers. Based on chronological considerations, this incident took place shortly before the sale of Joseph. 18 Even after the brothers married and established families of their own, they continued to live in close proximity to one another and worked together. It is unclear whether each brother owned his own property, or if they were partners in a family business. In any case, Judah now left the presence of his brothers to establish his own private business. Judah reached Adulam, a city in the south of Judea, and he turned to an Adulamite man and befriended him, and his name was Hira.
Judah saw there, in Adulam, the daughter of a Canaanite man, and his name was Shua. He took her in marriage, and engaged in intercourse with her.
She conceived and she bore a son; he called his name Er.
She conceived again and bore a son; she called his name Onan. This name might derive from the similar Hebrew word for might or vitality.
She continued and bore a son again, and she called his name Shela. He, Judah, was at the place known as Keziv, when she bore him. Perhaps this parenthetical comment is meant to explain why Shua’s daughter, rather than Judah, named both their second and third sons. Perhaps the standard custom was for parents to alternate naming rights, such that Judah was supposed to name their third son. However, since Judah was in Keziv, his wife named the child.
Judah took a wife for Er his firstborn, and her name was Tamar. Nothing is known of her origins or ethnicity. It is possible that the absence of any background information alludes to the fact that Tamar was not from the local population. Indeed, the Sages identify her as a descendant of Shem. 19 Some suggest she was from Aram Naharayim. 20
Er, Judah’s firstborn, was wicked in the eyes of the Lord; and as punishment for his sins the Lord put him to death while he was still young.
Judah said to Onan: Engage in intercourse with your brother’s wife, and consummate levirate marriage with her. Establish offspring for your brother. The children born from this levirate marriage will be considered the children of the deceased brother. Although the surviving brother is certainly the biological father of these children, he is merely a substitute for his deceased bother. 21
Onan knew that the offspring would not be his, and that any children born from this marriage would not be called by his name, but by the name of his deceased brother. Therefore, it was when he engaged in intercourse with his brother’s wife; he would spill it on the ground, practiced coitus interruptus, so as not to give offspring for his brother . Out of envy, Onan preferred to have no children rather than have children who would be regarded as his brother’s.
That which he did was evil in the eyes of the Lord. Unlike his brother, Onan’s transgression is explicitly stated by the verse. And He put him to death too, and Onan died at a young age.
Judah said to Tamar, his daughter-in-law: Do not remain in my house; rather, remain a widow, alone in your father’s house, until Shela my third son matures. It would appear that Shela had not yet reached marriageable age. Although Shela was supposed to perform levirate marriage when coming of age, Judah was not interested in allowing a marriage between Shela and Tamar, for he said: Lest he too die, like his brothers. He was concerned that Tamar was somehow a dangerous woman who caused the deaths of his first two sons. To protect his youngest son, Judah sent Tamar from his house. 22 So Tamar went and lived in her father’s house.
The days and years accumulated and the unnamed daughter of Shua, wife of Judah, died. After mourning over her death, Judah was comforted and ceased to mourn, and he went up to visit his sheepshearers, who were apparently located a significant distance from Judah’s home. Among other reasons, Judah sought to relieve the grief due to his wife’s death by participating in the shearing of his sheep, typically a festive and joyous occasion. He and Hira, his friend the Adulamite, came to Timna. Perhaps Judah’s close friend came to comfort him, and then decided to accompany Judah to the sheep shearing.
It was told to Tamar, saying: Behold, your father-in-law is going up to Timna to shear his sheep. As Tamar belonged to Judah’s family, she was informed of his trip. She decided to take drastic action.
She removed the garments of her widowhood from upon her. It was customary for widows to wear distinctive garments testifying to their familial status. 23 This custom was especially significant in the case of a widow like Tamar, who was awaiting levirate marriage and was unable to marry whomever she wished. She covered herself with a large veil concealing her entire body, wrapped herself, covering herself completely in the manor of harlots, who wore loose-fitting garments. And she sat at the entrance of a place called Einayim, which is on the road to Timna. Perhaps Einayim was called by this name because there were ma’ayanot , springs, there. 24 Tamar knew that Judah would need to pass through Einayim, so she waited for him there. Her behavior did not stem from some character flaw, but from despair, for she saw that Shela had matured and reached marriageable age, but yet she had not been given to him as a wife. Tamar understood that Judah did not want her to be married to Shela, which meant that she could remain a widow for the rest of her life.
Judah saw her on the road and thought her to be a harlot because she covered her face. Evidently, harlots were known to partially cover their faces.
Because Judah was a lonely widower, when he saw her he turned to her by the road, and he said: Please, let me engage in intercourse with you; for he did not know that she was his daughter-in-law. By Torah law, relations between a father-in-law and daughter-in-law are strictly prohibited, even after the son’s death. Although this incident took place before the Torah was given, it is clear that the laws of the time would have prevented a father-in-law from marrying his daughter-in-law. 25 Therefore, there is no doubt that had Judah known the true identity of this woman, he would not have turned to her. She said: What will you give me that you will engage in intercourse with me? As she was impersonating a harlot, Tamar demanded payment.
He said: I will send you a kid from the flock as payment. She said: If you give me collateral until your sending. To ensure that you provide payment, give me collateral to hold until I receive the kid.
He said: What is the collateral that I should give you? She said: Your signet, which was either on his ring or otherwise held close to his body, and your belt, and your staff that is in your hand. This appears to be a ruler’s staff, as the preceding verses indicate that Judah held some minor governing capacity. He gave them to her, engaged in intercourse with her, and she conceived by him. The fact that Judah gave this unknown woman various personal items including his signet, an item not normally given out or lent, as it is used to certify legal documents, demonstrates that Judah was not acting judiciously at that time.
After Judah left, she arose, went, and removed her veil from upon her, and she donned the garments of her widowhood. Tamar achieved her goal: Through her actions, she effectively guaranteed that Judah would consummate a levirate marriage with her. She succeeded in changing her status from barren widow to married mother, and she fulfilled her desire to be the wife of a member of Judah’s family.
After some time, out of a sense of obligation and a desire to retrieve his collateral, Judah sent the kid to Tamar in the hand of his friend the Adulamite. Since Hira was a close friend, Judah trusted his discretion and was not ashamed to send him on this mission. However, Hira came to the place where Judah initially met the woman, to take the collateral from the woman, but he did not find her.
He asked the men of her place, saying: Where is the harlot, who was at Einayim on the way? They said: There was no harlot here.
He returned to Judah, and said: I did not find her. The men of the place also said: There was no harlot here.
Judah said: If so, let her take it, the collateral, for her, lest we become a laughingstock; behold, I sent this kid, and you did not find her. If she does not want or is unable to claim her payment, then let the collateral remain with her. Although the items Judah deposited with the woman were of importance to him, he did not wish to continue searching for her.
It was some three months later, after Judah’s encounter with Tamar, that it was told to Judah, saying: Tamar, your daughter-in-law, acted licentiously; moreover, this is evidenced by the fact that behold, she conceived through harlotry. Tamar had no qualms about what she had done, as she felt that she had fulfilled the spirit of the law of levirate marriage. She therefore made no attempt to conceal her pregnancy. Nevertheless, since she seduced Judah in a deceitful manner, such that the identity of the father of the fetus was unknown to all except Tamar, she was susceptible to severe consequences, as she was tethered to Judah’s family with a marriage-like bond. The Sages refer to such a woman as a widow awaiting her brother-in-law. 26 Since it was assumed that she became pregnant through a man not from Judah’s family, her fate was to be that of an adulterous woman. Therefore, Judah, her father-in-law, the patriarch of his family, and a distinguished member of his community, said: Take her out, and she shall be burned.
She was taken out to receive her punishment. Since she was imprisoned, she wrapped the items she received from Judah and she sent them by messenger to her father-in-law, saying: By the man whose these are I am with child. She said: Recognize, please, whose signet, belt, and staff are these.
Judah recognized them, his possessions, and said: She is more righteous than I; because indeed, I did not give her to Shela my son. She had some right to be with me, as I did not give her to Shela. Therefore, she cannot be accused of committing adultery. And he was not intimate with her anymore, as he already fulfilled his obligation toward Tamar. Although Judah recognized the legality of Tamar’s actions and the legitimacy of her fetus, he was uninterested in continuing a relationship with her.
It was at the time of her giving birth, and behold, twins were in her womb.
It was as she was giving birth, that one of the twins extended a hand outside the womb. Faced with this unusual situation, the midwife took and bound upon his hand a crimson thread, saying, indicating: This one emerged first and was the firstborn.
However, it was, as he retracted his hand back inside the womb , and behold, his brother emerged from the womb first. Thus, the brother without the crimson thread was ultimately the firstborn. And she said to the child that emerged first: What breach [ paretz ] have you breached for yourself? Your brother was already poised to emerge first. Therefore, he, Judah, called his name Peretz.
Afterward his brother emerged, on whose hand was the crimson thread; he called his name Zerah, literally, “glow,” alluding to the gleaming red thread tied to his hand.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 39
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 39 somebodyJoseph was brought down to Egypt as a slave devoid of rights. Potifar, the courtier of Pharaoh, chief executioner, an Egyptian, bought him from the Ishmaelites, who had brought him down there.
The Lord was with Joseph, and he was a successful man in the house of Potifar. Joseph arrived in Egypt as an inexperienced youth and with no knowledge of the Egyptian language. He also needed to cross the cultural divide between his upbringing in a small village to life in a developed city. Nevertheless, his success was evident for all to see. And he was in the house of his master, the Egyptian.
After some time, his master saw that the Lord was with him, and all that he did, the Lord made his undertaking successful. Potifar took notice of Joseph’s success.
Joseph found favor in his eyes, and he served him as his personal attendant. Following that, Potifar promoted him and he appointed him overseer of his household, and everything that was his he placed in his charge, as Potifar saw Joseph’s successes as well as his honesty.
It was once he appointed him overseer of his household and over everything that was his; the Lord blessed the Egyptian’s house for Joseph’s sake. The blessing of the Lord was in all that he had, in the house and in the field. In addition to Joseph’s personal success, Potifar noticed that he too became prosperous. He sensed that this was due to Joseph’s presence, just as Laban had known to attribute his prosperity to Jacob a generation earlier (see also 30:27).
Therefore, he left everything that he had in Joseph’s charge; and he did not know anything about his doings except the bread that he would eat. In other words, Potifar found it unnecessary for himself to be involved in the affairs of his household, as he trusted Joseph completely; he was therefore present only for his personal needs, such as eating. 27 The Torah adds a comment that will be important in the continuation of the narrative: Joseph, who was probably around eighteen or twenty years old at the time, was of fine form, and handsome. As previously discussed, he bore a resemblance to his mother, who was also described in such terms. 28
It was after these matters, after Joseph was promoted above Potifar’s other servants and presumably began to dress in more impressive clothing, that his master’s wife cast her eyes upon Joseph; she desired him. And she said: Lie with me. Despite his elevated status, Joseph was still a slave. She therefore spoke directly and in unequivocal terms.
He refused to lie with her; and in order not to offend her, Joseph explained that his refusal was not because of her appearance or some other reason. He said to his master’s wife: Behold, my master Potifar does not know anything about what is in the house. He trusts me to such a degree that he has no idea what I do in this house, and he has placed everything that he has in my charge.
There is no one greater in this house than I; he has provided good living conditions for me and he has not withheld anything from me but you, as you are his wife. Furthermore, aside from the fact that lying with you would constitute a betrayal of my master’s trust and a complete lack of appreciation for all that he has provided me, there are also religious grounds for my refusal: How can I do this great wickedness, and sin to God?
Despite Joseph’s refusal, she persisted: It was as she spoke to Joseph day after day, and he did not heed her to lie with her, to be with her. At first, she tried to the best of her ability to seduce Joseph. When he refused, she requested that he lie in her bed beside her. 29 Joseph was torn between temptation and the restraint demanded by his religion and his conscience. Nevertheless, the more she pushed to be with Joseph, the more he took effort to avoid her. 30
It was on a certain day, a festive occasion, 31 that he, Joseph, went into the house to perform his labor, and none of the people of the household were there in the house. Perhaps everyone went to partake in whatever celebrations were taking place on that day. 32 Joseph, as a faithful servant, remained in the house. Potifar’s wife also remained, as she had plans of her own:
She seized him by his garment, saying: Lie with me. He left his garment in her hand. At that time, people wore robes that wrapped around their bodies. Accordingly, when she grabbed Joseph’s garment, he was able to unravel himself from it, leaving it in her hand. Joseph fled, and went outside.
It was when she saw that he had left his garment in her hand, and had fled outside. When she realized that even now, Joseph refused to lie with her, she could no longer rationalize his refusal by claiming that it was as an attempt to tease her, or that he rejected her until a more opportune time would present itself. She now felt immensely insulted, whether because she failed to achieve her desire, or because the lowly servant Joseph had the audacity to refuse her demands.
Potifar’s wife sought to protect her dignity and simultaneously take revenge against Joseph. She called to the people of her household, and spoke to them, saying: See, he, Potifar, brought to us a Hebrew man to ridicule us (see 19:14). Alternatively, the verse means: He brought to us a Hebrew man to abuse us. 33 He came to me to lie with me, and I, being a decent woman, cried out immediately with a loud voice.
It was when he heard; I raised my voice and cried. He left his garment with me, fled, and went outside.
Potifar’s wife did not suffice with relating this tale to the members of the household; rather, she placed his garment beside her, until his master’s arrival to his home.
She spoke to him these words, saying: The Hebrew slave whom you brought to us and whom you promoted, came to me to mock me.
It was as I raised my voice and cried that he left his garment with me and fled outside.
It was when his master heard the words of his wife that she spoke to him, saying: Your slave did to me in this manner, he attempted to rape me, he, Potifar, was incensed. It should be noted that the verse does not state with whom he was incensed.
Joseph’s master took him, without any judicial process, and placed him in the prison in order to punish him, in the place where the king’s prisoners were incarcerated. It later becomes apparent that this prison housed distinguished political prisoners, not convicted criminals. And he was there in the prison as one of the prisoners.
The Lord was with Joseph, and granted him appeal, and put his favor in the eyes of the commandant of the prison. Joseph had the ability to ingratiate himself with people outside of his family.
Joseph’s charm was effective even on the commandant of the prison. He took notice of Joseph, and after some time the commandant of the prison put in Joseph’s charge all the prisoners that were in the prison. Even though Joseph was still a prisoner, he again earned an administrative position. He was considered a loyal and trustworthy prisoner, and an excellent administrator. He was therefore appointed to oversee all the other prisoners. And everything that they did there, he, Joseph, would determine. Joseph was in charge of the daily routine of the prison: meal times, recreational times, and all other daily activities of the prisoners.
Eventually, the commandant of the prison did not oversee anything in his charge. The commandant trusted Joseph completely and did not scrutinize his actions, for all could see that the Lord was with him. That which he did, the Lord made successful. Joseph was not simply a man of fine appearance. His charm captured everyone around him: Potifar, Potifar’s wife, and the commandant of the prison. Later in the narrative, others are also captivated by his charm. Aside from his extraordinary effectiveness, something about Joseph’s personality conveyed to those around him that God was with him, and that he was somehow connected to supreme holiness.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 40
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 40 somebodyIt was after these matters, after Joseph received an important position in the prison, that the butler of the king of Egypt, who was responsible for providing the king with drink, and the baker of the king, sinned against their master, against the king of Egypt.
Pharaoh became angry at his two courtiers, at the chief butler and at the chief baker. The Torah does not elaborate as to why he was angry at them. The Midrash relates that Pharaoh became angry because he discovered foreign objects in his bread and wine. 34
He placed them in custody in the household of the chief executioner , 35 in the prison, the place where Joseph was incarcerated. This prison held distinguished prisoners. Since the courtiers of Pharaoh were men of status who might someday return to their lofty positions, they were provided special privileges.
The chief executioner, Potifar, charged Joseph with them, and he served them, and they were in custody one year . 36
They , the butler and the baker, dreamed a dream both of them – each man his dream during one night, each man in accordance with the interpretation of his dream. The eventual interpretation of each man’s dream, that of the butler and that of the baker of the king of Egypt, who were incarcerated in the prison, would match its content. 37
Joseph came to them in the morning to serve them, and saw them, and behold, they were distressed. As their attendant, Joseph was able to sense the change in their demeanor.
He asked Pharaoh’s courtiers who were with him in the custody of his master’s house, saying: Why are your faces wretched today?
They said to him: We dreamed a dream, and there is no interpreter for it. We sense that our dreams contain an important message, but we are unable to decipher them. Joseph said to them: Aren’t interpretations for God? The interpretation of a dream and its realization lie solely in the hands of God; He can inform us of its meaning. 38 Therefore, please, relate it to me; perhaps I will succeed in interpreting it.
Joseph succeeding in ingratiating himself with these ministers, and they trusted him: The chief butler told his dream to Joseph, and said to him: In my dream, behold, a vine was before me.
On the vine were three tendrils, and it was as though it was budding. Then its blossoms emerged, and its clusters produced ripe grapes.
Pharaoh’s cup was in my hand; I took the grapes, pressed them into Pharaoh’s cup, and I gave the cup into Pharaoh’s hand.
Joseph said to him: This is its interpretation: The three tendrils are three days;
In three more days Pharaoh shall raise your head, your status, and restore you to your original position. Then your dream will materialize in a literal sense, as you will give Pharaoh’s cup into his hand, like the former circumstance where you would provide him with drink.
Joseph demonstrated just how certain he was of the correctness of his interpretation. He requested of the butler: If only you remember me when it shall be well for you, when your dream is realized and you are reinstalled in your position, and please, perform kindness with me and mention me to Pharaoh, and you will thereby help take me out of this house, this prison.
For I was abducted from the land of the Hebrews. I was not born a slave; I am a freeman who was kidnapped. And here too I have done nothing wrong to justify the fact that they placed me in the pit.
The chief baker saw that he interpreted well. Joseph’s interpretation seemed pleasing and accurate to the baker. Some opinions maintain that in addition to their own respective dreams, each minister dreamed the interpretation of the other. Consequently, the baker knew that Joseph correctly interpreted the butler’s dream. 39 And he said to Joseph: I too, in my dream, dreamed that behold, there were three wicker baskets stacked one upon the other on my head. Wicker baskets are typically used to hold baked goods, as the gaps in the weaves allow for air to pass to the goods inside them.
In the uppermost basket there was all manner of food for Pharaoh, baked products; and the birds were eating them from the basket above my head.
Joseph answered and said: This is its interpretation: The three baskets are three days.
In three more days Pharaoh shall raise, remove, your head from upon you, and shall hang you on a tree. The birds shall eat your flesh from upon you. Part of the dream will indeed be fulfilled, as the birds will eat. However, instead of consuming the contents of the wicker baskets, they will consume your flesh. In this dream, unlike in the butler’s dream, the baker’s hoped-for restoration does not occur. Rather, the birds partake of the baked goods in place of Pharaoh.
It was on the third day, the day of Pharaoh’s public birthday celebration, that he made a feast for all his servants; and during that feast he raised the head of the chief butler and the head of the chief baker among his servants. While Pharaoh sat with his entourage, he was reminded of the absence of the butler and the baker. It seems that when the butler and baker committed their offenses, Pharaoh was angered and had them imprisoned without judgement. Now, Pharaoh issued a ruling: He concluded that the chief butler properly executed his duties and was therefore innocent, while the chief baker acted improperly and was therefore guilty.
Accordingly, he, Pharaoh, restored the chief butler to his butlership, and he gave the cup into Pharaoh’s hand;
and he hanged the chief baker, as Joseph interpreted for them.
But despite the fact that the chief butler witnessed the complete accuracy of Joseph’s interpretation, the chief butler did not immediately remember the request that Joseph made of him. Rather, as time progressed he forgot him, as he no longer had any interaction with him.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 41
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 41 somebodyIt was at the conclusion of two years since the chief butler had been restored to his post; Pharaoh was dreaming: Behold, in his dream he stood at the Nile River, upon which all life in Egypt depended.
Behold, coming up from the Nile were seven cows, fair and fat fleshed, and they grazed in the pasture .
Behold, seven other cows were coming up after them from the river, and they were unsightly and lean fleshed, and they stood alongside the other cows on the bank of the Nile.
The unsightly and lean-fleshed cows ate the seven fair and fat cows, and Pharaoh awoke. Presumably, Pharaoh woke up from the shock of seeing cows eat other cows.
He slept and dreamed a second time that same night, and behold, seven ears of grain were growing on one stalk. In years of especially fertile harvests, two or three ears might grow from a single stalk. The vision Pharaoh saw in his dream of seven ears on a single stalk is most unusual. These ears were plump and good.
Behold, he saw seven ears, thin and blighted by the dry east wind. These inferior ears were growing after them.
The thin ears swallowed the seven plump and full ears. This dream is even stranger than the previous one, as in the first dream, cows were eating, and in this dream, ears of grain are eating. And Pharaoh awoke, and behold, this too was only a dream . 1
It was in the morning and his spirit was troubled. Pharaoh was upset by the strong impression the dreams had left upon him. He sent and called for all the magicians of Egypt, its priests, who also engaged in science and medicine, and all its wise men; Pharaoh related his dream to them, but no one could interpret them for Pharaoh. Some commentaries explain that although his advisors were able to suggest interpretations, all of their ideas appeared unsuitable to Pharaoh. 2
The chief butler spoke to Pharaoh, saying: I mention my sins today. Although what I am about to say will include a mention of earlier sins of mine, it is important that I issue my statement nonetheless.
Pharaoh became angry with his servants, and he placed me in the custody of the house of the chief executioner, me and the chief baker.
We dreamed a dream one night, I and he; each of us dreamed in accordance with the interpretation of his dream; we both had dreams that came to pass.
There with us was a Hebrew lad, a slave of the chief executioner; we told him the dreams, and he interpreted our dreams for us; each of us in accordance with his own dream he interpreted, so that each dream and its interpretation suited each other.
Furthermore, it was that as he interpreted to us, so it was. Not only did the interpretation sound convincing, it came true as well: Me, he, Pharaoh, restored to my position, and him, the chief baker, he hanged.
Since he was anxious to find the correct interpretation of his dream, Pharaoh sent and summoned Joseph, and they rushed him from the dungeon. He shaved, so that he would not appear unkempt when he appeared before the king after his lengthy period of imprisonment, he changed his garments to decent clothing, and came to Pharaoh.
Pharaoh said to Joseph: I dreamed a dream, and there is no interpreter of it; and I heard about you, saying: You will hear a dream to interpret it.
Joseph answered Pharaoh, saying: Not by me. You do not need my skills, as I am not the interpreter. Rather, God will respond for Pharaoh’s peace. At most, I can serve as an intermediary.
Pharaoh spoke to Joseph: In my dream, behold, I am standing on the bank of the Nile.
Behold, seven cows, fat fleshed and fair, come up from the Nile, and they grazed in the pasture.
Behold, seven other cows come up after them, scrawny, very unsightly, and lean fleshed. Here Pharaoh adds his own impression of the sight: I have not seen like them in all the land of Egypt for deficiency.
The lean and unsightly cows ate the first seven fat cows.
Pharaoh adds another observation: They came into their innards, but it was not apparent that they came into their innards, as no change was discernible in the scrawny cows; and their appearance was just as unsightly as it was at first, and I awoke.
I saw in my dream, and behold, seven ears of grain growing on one stalk, plump and good.
Behold, seven ears of grain, parched, thin, and blighted by the east wind, growing after them.
The thin ears swallowed the seven good ears. I told it to the magicians, but no one could tell me. Since I have not received a satisfactory interpretation from the magicians, I await your response.
Joseph said to Pharaoh: Although you saw two different dreams, in fact the dream of Pharaoh is one; that which God does, He told Pharaoh. It is a prophetic dream in which you were informed of future events.
The seven good cows are seven years and the seven good ears are seven years: It is one dream. The fact that the two visions are part of one dream is significant, as it bundles the cows and ears together. The cows symbolize growth, life, and abundance, whereas the ears stand for the cycles of growth because, in contrast to the cows, whose productivity is not dependent on the cycle of the year, the crop of grain is renewed on a yearly basis. Thus the seven ears define the timeframe for the abundance represented by the seven cows.
The seven scrawny and unsightly cows that come up after them are seven years, and the seven empty ears blighted by the east wind shall be seven years of famine. In contrast to the polite hesitance with which Joseph began his speech to Pharaoh, here he speaks decisively and in a dramatic, almost poetic style.
That is the matter that I spoke to Pharaoh: That which God does, He showed Pharaoh.
Behold, seven years are coming in which there will be great plenty throughout the land of Egypt. These are represented by the fat cows and the good ears.
However, seven years of famine shall arise after them. These are represented by the unsightly cows and the blighted ears. And all the plenty in the land of Egypt shall be forgotten; the famine shall devastate the land.
The plenty shall not be known in the land due to that famine afterward, for it shall be very severe. Here Joseph interprets Pharaoh’s description of the fact that it was not apparent that the seven fat cows had come to the innards of the scrawny cows. He states that this is an indication that the bad years shall consume all the produce of the good years, of which nothing shall remain.
With regard to the repetition of the dream to Pharaoh twice, it is because the matter is determined by God, and God hastens to perform it. The two parts of the dream complement and clarify one another, as Joseph had explained, yet Pharaoh dreamed them separately. This reiteration is indicative of the finality of the matter and is a sign that the message expressed in the dream will come to pass in the near future. This is similar to a repeated cry at a time of danger.
Now that God has revealed the future to you and sent you a practical warning, let Pharaoh look for an insightful person, one who can anticipate forthcoming events from what he observes in the present, and he must be a wise man, who has seen and heard much and accumulated knowledge, 3 and install him over the land of Egypt. Joseph stresses that this is a position that requires a man of exceptional qualities. Therefore, it is inadvisable for Pharaoh to appoint one of his current ministers.
Pharaoh should proceed and appoint officials over the land, and he shall supply the land of Egypt during the seven years of plenty.
They will gather all the food of these coming good years and amass grain under the control of Pharaoh; they will collect food in the cities and they will preserve it.
The food shall be for a security for the land for the seven years of famine that shall be in the land of Egypt, and the land will not perish in the famine.
The matter was worthy in the eyes of Pharaoh. The interpretation was accepted by Pharaoh, as each of its details matched a feature of his dream. He liked Joseph’s advice because it had great economic potential for the country, and it would concentrate power in Pharaoh’s hands during the years of famine. And the matter was likewise worthy in the eyes of all his servants, perhaps because each of them separately thought that he would be selected as the insightful, wise man who would manage the Egyptian economy in the forthcoming years.
Pharaoh said to his servants: Can we find someone like this, a man in whom there is the spirit of God?
Pharaoh said to Joseph: After God has disclosed all this to you, there is no one as insightful and wise as you. Pharaoh was deeply impressed by Joseph. Perhaps Joseph’s appearance contributed to this, as he appeared in civilian clothes and presumably, by that point, spoke fluent Egyptian. Like most of those who had encountered Joseph, Pharaoh recognized his wisdom and potential, and he realized that Joseph merited even divinely inspired insight.
Consequently, Pharaoh authorized Joseph to act in accordance with his interpretation and suggestions: You will be in charge of my house, and all my people shall be sustained [ yishak ] at your directive . 4 Alternatively, this may be interpreted to mean that the people would be able to bear arms only at Joseph’s directive. 5 Yet another interpretation is that all would come to kiss him, 6 as everyone would honor and admire Joseph and would be subservient to him. These latter interpretations are based on different meanings of the root nun - shin - kuf , which can mean “weapon” or “kiss.” Pharaoh further states: Although your authority is limited to a specific matter, due to its vital nature, only the throne will I make too great for you. I shall not relinquish the throne, but I will empower you to as great an extent as possible.
Pharaoh said to Joseph: See, I have set you over the entire land of Egypt. You are in charge of all of Egypt with regard to these matters.
Pharaoh removed his signet ring from upon his hand. Since the signet ring contained an official seal, its transfer to Joseph was a significant step in his empowerment. And he placed it upon Joseph’s hand; once Joseph was granted his position of authority, he dressed him in garments of linen, and he placed a gold chain on his neck.
He had him ride in the alternate chariot that he had, the chariot he would use when the king’s regular chariot was unavailable. Pharaoh kept his personal chariot exclusively for himself. And they cried before him: Kneel. 7 When Joseph traveled in his chariot, all were obliged to kneel before him. And he was set over the entire land of Egypt. Pharaoh formally and publicly announced that Joseph was in charge of all of Egypt.
Pharaoh summarized the matter and said to Joseph: I am Pharaoh, descendant of the gods, ruler and governor, and yet, beyond that, without you no man shall lift his hand or his foot in the entire land of Egypt. You have full authority over everything that is done in the land.
Pharaoh called Joseph’s name Tzafenat Paneah; and as Joseph was now an important figure, Pharaoh arranged for him to be married: He gave him Asenat, daughter of Poti Fera, priest of On, as a wife. Joseph came out over the land of Egypt; he traversed the land as its ruler and began to organize its internal affairs.
Joseph was thirty years old as he stood before Pharaoh king of Egypt. Thirteen years had passed since his original dreams, due to which he was sold and exiled from his land (37:2). Since that time his status had changed beyond recognition. Joseph came out from before Pharaoh, and he passed through the entire land of Egypt in order to put into practice his advice to Pharaoh.
The earth produced, during the seven years of plenty, in abundance [ kematzim ]. The grains of a single stalk amounted to a handful [ kometz ], or several handfuls. 8 Alternatively, some explain that this means that the earth produced enough to fill the storehouses. 9 In any event, the verse expresses the fact that the yield of the land was extensive.
He, Joseph, gathered all the food of the seven years that was in the land of Egypt and placed food in the cities; he placed the food of the fields that was around the city in it. In every city Joseph stored the produce that grew in its environs, both in order to keep the produce in the local climate to which it was accustomed, and also because each city could estimate accurately the amount of produce required for its inhabitants.
Joseph amassed grain like the sand of the sea, very much, until one stopped counting as it was without number. An enormous amount of produce grew each year. It is possible that this verse should be understood literally: At first they tried keeping records, but eventually they gave up, overwhelmed by the sheer mass of produce.
Two sons were born to Joseph during the years of plenty before the advent of the year of the famine, who were born to him by Asenat, daughter of Poti Fera, priest of On.
Joseph called the name of the firstborn Manasseh, as he felt: God has made me forget [ nashani ] all my toil, my suffering and hardship, and the trouble of my father’s entire house, from which I suffered for many years, as I am now a new person.
He called the name of the second son Efraim, as he said: Not only have I forgotten my suffering, but now God has made me fruitful [ hifrani ] in that I have become successful and risen to prominence in the land of my affliction.
The seven years of plenty that was in the land of Egypt concluded.
The seven years of famine began to come, as Joseph had said. In Egypt, which is mainly dependent not on rainfall but on an irrigation system whose source is the Nile, this transition was sharp. If for whatever reason the water level in the Nile falls lower than required, the land does not produce, resulting in famine. Furthermore, this was not merely a local problem in the mountains of Africa, which failed to provide enough water. Rather, there was famine in all lands, due to climate changes. But in all of the land of Egypt there was bread.
After private stores of food ran out and it became clear that the summer harvest produced a meager yield, all of the land of Egypt was hungry, and the people cried to Pharaoh for bread. The citizens’ direct and indirect complaints were directed at Pharaoh not only because he was their ruler, but also because they attributed divine qualities to him. Pharaoh said to all the Egyptians: Go to Joseph, as he is in charge of dealing with your sustenance; what he says to you, you shall do. Pharaoh sought to spare himself, his ministers, and his close confidants the pressure of handling this problem. As soon as it became necessary to start distributing food in an organized manner, he directed all complaints to Joseph.
The famine was on the entire face of the earth, outside Egypt as well, and therefore it was impossible to import food. And Joseph opened all that was in them, the storehouses, and sold grain to the Egyptians. It is unclear whether in the first stage Joseph bought the produce or whether he collected it as a tax. In any case, at this point he sells it. The famine was intensified in the land of Egypt, as the people had nothing to eat apart from the produce in Joseph’s granaries.
All the land, neighboring countries, came to Egypt to purchase grain from Joseph, for the famine was severe in all the land. Up to this point Joseph’s interpretation of Pharaoh’s dream had come to pass in full.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 42
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 42 somebodyJacob saw that there was grain in Egypt, as Joseph sold produce not only to citizens of Egypt but to foreigners as well. Since Jacob and his sons were mainly shepherds, their distress was less immediate and apparent than that of their neighboring farmers. And therefore Jacob said to his sons: Why are you presenting yourselves? Do not display yourselves as exceptions to the general plight, lest hungry individuals surrounding us become envious of us or even attack us.
He said: Behold, I have heard that there is grain in Egypt. Go down there and acquire grain for us from there that we will live and not die.
Ten of Joseph’s brothers went down to acquire grain from Egypt. The more men who went down, the more produce they could carry back with them.
But Benjamin, Joseph’s brother on his mother’s side as well, Jacob did not send with his other brothers, as he said: Lest disaster befall him.
The sons of Israel, Jacob, came to acquire grain among those others who came from Canaan to acquire grain in Egypt, as the famine was in the land of Canaan.
Joseph was the ruler over the land; he was the provider of grain to all the people of the land. Joseph did not deal merely with the actual sale of food; he was also responsible for providing oversight of the entire process. This meant that he had to take political considerations into account when supplying produce in order to ensure that foreigners would not endanger the security of the country. Joseph’s brothers came, and when they saw the powerful minister they prostrated themselves to him, faces to the earth, like all the other purchasers.
Joseph saw his brothers, and he recognized them. Although he had not seen them for over twenty years and their appearances had certainly changed, Joseph had no difficulty recognizing them, as they had all arrived together and wore their customary garments. But he acted as though he were a stranger to them and spoke harshly to them. Joseph used his authority in order to cause them difficulties. He said to them: From where did you come? They said, in complete innocence: From the land of Canaan to acquire food.
Joseph recognized each of his brothers , 10 but they did not recognize him, as he was older, his clothing had changed, his beard had grown, his hair was presumably cut in the Egyptian style, and everyone called him Tzafenat Paneah. Above all, the brothers presumably thought he had died, and they certainly did not expect him to have risen to a position of such prominence.
Joseph remembered the dreams that he had dreamed about them, as well as all the events that had followed those dreams, and he said to them: You are not mere purchasers of grain, but you are spies; to see the nakedness of the land you have come. You are foreign agents who have been sent to discover Egypt’s weaknesses.
They said to him, in all honesty: No, my lord, but your servants have come to acquire food.
We are all the sons of one man. Yes, we came as a group, but that is due to the fact that we are brothers, not because we are spies. We are sincere; your servants have not been spies. We are simple, honest folk who have never been involved in espionage.
He said to them: No, I do not believe you, but the nakedness of the land you came to see. Your story sounds suspicious to me.
The brothers, simple shepherds, were unsure how to defend themselves from the accusation of the Egyptian viceroy, who was responsible for the security of the entire realm. In their distress, they could do nothing other than tell the truth about themselves, even if the facts they offered had nothing to do with the matter at hand. They said: We, your servants, are twelve brothers, sons of one man in the land of Canaan; and behold, the youngest is with our father today, and one is absent.
Joseph said to them: That is what I spoke to you, saying: You are spies. Your detailed presentation is very convincing, but those very details may be used to expose you as skilled liars and cunning spies.
With this you shall be put to the test: By Pharaoh’s life, you shall not depart from here unless your youngest brother comes here. Swearing on the life of Pharaoh is the most severe oath an Egyptian can utter. Joseph declared that they would not leave until their brother came; only in that way could he confirm their account.
Dispatch one of you, and he will take your brother from his land, and you shall be incarcerated, that your statements will be verified, whether there is truth with you; and if not, by Pharaoh’s life, you are spies. Joseph’s suggestion is based on the reasonable assumption that when spies are captured, those who sent them might try to rescue them, but not by sending an additional agent to directly confront their captors. Therefore, the arrival of their youngest brother would attest to their family ties and refute the charge of military espionage.
He gathered them into custody, where they remained for three days.
Joseph said to them on the third day: Do this and live, as I fear God. I am a fair man, and so far I cannot prove my suspicions.
If you are sincere and your story is true, one of your brothers shall be incarcerated as a guarantee in the place of your custody, and the rest of you, go bring grain for the hunger of your houses. If you indeed came to purchase food, your absence will not only be a source of sorrow for your families but will bring disaster upon them, as they will have no food.
Joseph expresses toward his brothers a measure of compassion tempered by caution: In his compassion he will permit them to return home, but in case they are spies he demands: Bring your youngest brother to me upon your next visit, and your statements will thereby be verified, and you shall not die from hunger or at the hand of my messengers. 11 They did so. Joseph’s orders were followed: The brothers were given food like all other customers and were granted permission to leave.
Up to this point, the Torah has cited Joseph’s statements and his brothers’ replies; it has not related any conversations between the brothers themselves. Perhaps Joseph had them incarcerated in separate cells, and only now did they have the opportunity to talk to one another. Faced with such a baseless accusation, they felt pangs of conscience due to the trauma they remembered so well from years ago, when they sold their brother. They said one to another: But we are indeed guilty with regard to our brother, that we saw the anguish of his soul as he pleaded with us and we did not heed. We were all partners in Joseph’s sale. Benjamin, who was too young at the time, is not with us now either. Having been thrown into the prison dungeon by a force beyond their control, as a result of an unjust accusation, the brothers had a similar experience to that which they had inflicted upon Joseph. They now sensed that they were being punished for their sin, and they declared: For that, this anguish has befallen us as a punishment from Heaven.
Reuben responded to them, saying: Didn’t I say this to you at the time, saying: Do not sin against the child; and you did not heed my words? Now, behold, there is a divine reckoning for his blood. We caused his death, and now we are receiving our punishment.
They did not know that Joseph understood. Although Joseph was standing there while they were talking, it did not occur to them they he might understand what they were saying. To them he was an Egyptian unfamiliar with their language, as the interpreter was between them and had been interpreting all their conversations with Joseph.
He, Joseph, turned from them and wept profusely. And he then returned to them, back in his customary role as the Egyptian leader; he spoke to them, took Simeon from them, and incarcerated him before their eyes. They saw that Joseph’s commands were fulfilled. Simeon’s imprisonment would not be of short duration, since even if the brothers were to return without delay, the journey to Canaan and back would take a considerable time.
Joseph commanded his men that they fill their, his brothers’, vessels with grain, and restore each man’s silver to his sack. Due to his position of authority, Joseph could issue instructions that their payment for the produce should be placed in their sacks. And he gave orders to give them provisions for the way; and he, one of his attendants, did so for them. It is possible that they were not given food when they were incarcerated and had consumed some of their provisions. Joseph therefore provided them with new provisions.
They loaded their grain that they had purchased onto their donkeys and went from there.
On their way back to Canaan, one of them opened his sack to give feed to his donkey at the lodging place. He saw his silver, and behold, it was in the opening of his sack.
He said to his brothers: My silver that I paid for the produce was returned, and behold, it is in my sack. Their hearts sank in shock, and they trembled one with another, saying: What is this that God has done to us? They could not understand how this had happened, and they sensed that the strange and unusual events had befallen them as a punishment for their sins.
They came to their father, Jacob, to the land of Canaan, and they told him all that had befallen them, saying:
The man, lord of the land, spoke harshly with us and accused us as spies of the land.
For our part, we were honest, and we said to him: We are sincere; we have not been spies at any point in our lives.
We are twelve brothers, sons of our father; one is absent, and the youngest is today with our father in the land of Canaan. This is what we said to the man.
The man, lord of the land, said to us: With this I shall know that you are sincere: One of your brothers leave with me, and take grain for the hunger of your households, and go.
Yet you must bring your youngest brother to me, and I shall thereby know that you are not spies, that you are sincere. I will then give you your brother, who is currently incarcerated, and you shall trade in the land. You will be permitted to buy grain and engage in business dealings in Egypt, like all other foreigners who bring commodities from their lands to sell them or exchange them for food. The brothers stressed to their father that Joseph had agreed to grant them full rights once they would be cleared of any suspicion.
It was as they were emptying the grain from their sacks, and behold, they discovered that the money which one of them had found earlier was not an exceptional occurrence, as each man’s packet of silver was in his sack. They and their father saw their packets of silver that had been returned to them, and they were afraid.
Jacob their father said to them: You have bereaved me. Although their father is unaware of the truth about their sale of Joseph, he hurls a general accusation at them: Joseph is not, and now Simeon is also not, as he is incarcerated, and Benjamin you will take. You want me to send Benjamin with you as well? I am still pained by Joseph’s disappearance. All of these are upon me. It is true that you too are affected by these misfortunes, but you are unable to share my grief fully, as these troubles fall chiefly upon me, their father.
Reuben, the firstborn, said to his father as the spokesman for all the sons, saying: Take my two sons as a guarantee until I bring Benjamin back to you, and kill my two sons if I do not bring him to you; place him, Benjamin, in my charge, and I will return him to you. I accept the responsibility of bringing him home safely.
Presumably all of the brothers likewise made offers to guarantee Benjamin’s return, as they all wished to return to Egypt to free Simeon and to make matters right with the Egyptians, but Jacob resisted. He said: My youngest son shall not go down with you, for as you know, his brother is dead, and only he is left from his mother; and if disaster befalls him on the path on which you will go, then you will cause my old age to descend in sorrow to the grave. I will die from the terrible knowledge that Rachel’s two sons have been lost. Therefore, I will not let Benjamin leave my side.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 43
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 43 somebodyJacob does not suggest how Simeon might be freed, nor how the family might find food. He simply expresses his fears and prefers to let matters stand as they are rather than accept the risks proposed by his sons. However, the famine was severe in the land.
It was when they finished the grain that they had brought from Egypt; their father said to them: Return to Egypt and acquire a little more food for us.
Although Judah was only the fourth son, his leadership qualities had already come to the fore at the time of the sale of Joseph. 12 Since his status is comparable to that of a firstborn, Judah now addresses his father. Judah said to him, saying: The man in charge of the land explicitly forewarned us, saying: You shall not see my face, and you will not be permitted to buy anything here, unless your brother is with you.
Consequently, if you send our brother with us, we will go down to Egypt and acquire food for you.
But if you do not send him, we will not go down, for the man said to us: You shall not see my face unless your brother is with you.
Israel, Jacob, once again said: Why have you harmed me, to tell the man that you have another brother? What possible reason could there have been for you to have even mentioned your younger brother? Your unnecessary comment brought about all this trouble.
They said: The man asked with regard to us and with regard to our provenance. He did not start by asking about our brother. First he engaged us in a general conversation about our background. However, during the ensuing investigation he approached the topic, saying: Is your father still alive? Although Joseph had his own reasons for this line of inquiry, from the brothers’ perspective it was a natural question, after they had told him that they were all brothers of a single father. He subsequently asked: Do you have another brother? We told him with regard to those matters, answering his questions honestly. Could we know that he would say: Bring your brother down? Had we suspected that he would issue such a demand, we would certainly have acted with greater caution.
Judah said once again to Israel, his father, more firmly this time: Send the lad with me, and we will arise and go, and we will live and not die, both we, and you, and our children. Our plight is serious.
Finally, Judah promises his father: I will guarantee him and his safe return. From me you may solicit him; if I do not bring him to you and present him before you, I will have sinned to you forever, a blot that will never be wiped clean, neither in my lifetime nor after my death.
Since, had we not tarried until now because you were unwilling to send Benjamin and we did not pressure you to do so, we would by now have traveled to Egypt and returned twice.
Their father Israel said to them: If so, then since there is no alternative, do this: Take of the choice produce of the land in your vessels and take a gift down to the man. A gift can soften even the hearts of nobles. Jacob suggests that they take superior produce that grows in Canaan but not in Egypt: a little balm, used for perfume or medicine that at the time was produced almost exclusively in the Jordan valley; a little honey; spices 13 [ nekhot ], alternatively, some other luxury product; 14 labdanum, a type of cosmetic; as well as pistachio nuts and almonds;
take double the amount of silver in your hand, and the silver that was returned in the opening of your sacks return in your hand. Do not forget it, as they might remember it when you arrive and demand payment. Perhaps it was an oversight, and instead of putting your money away they accidentally placed it in your sacks together with the grain you purchased.
And take your brother, Benjamin, and arise and return to the man.
May God Almighty grant you mercy before the man, and he will send with you your other brother, Simeon, and Benjamin; and me, as I am bereaved, I am bereaved. If I experience another tragedy, so be it, as I am accustomed to tragedy.
The men took that gift, and they took in their hand double the silver and Benjamin; they arose and went down to Egypt, and they stood before Joseph.
Joseph saw Benjamin with them. Perhaps Joseph recognized his maternal brother, and even if his features had changed greatly over the years, he could safely have assumed that the new arrival was their younger brother. And he, Joseph, who had his own palace, complete with attendants and servants, said to the one in charge of his house: Bring the men to me to the house, and slaughter animals and prepare, as the men shall dine with me at noon. They will be my guests. Since Joseph’s Egyptian family was small, when a large group of guests arrived it was necessary to take them into account when planning the meal.
The man did as Joseph said, and the man brought the men to Joseph’s house.
The men were afraid because they were brought to Joseph’s house. Naturally, they wondered why they were being brought to the viceroy’s palace when they had come to buy food. They said: We have been brought on the matter of the silver that was restored to our sacks. The viceroy is certainly plotting to falsely accuse us, attack us, and eventually take us as slaves, and our donkeys.
Therefore, they approached the man in charge of Joseph’s house, and they spoke to him at the entrance of the house before entering.
They said: Please, my lord, 15 we initially descended to acquire food.
It was when we came to the lodging place and we opened our sacks; behold, each man’s silver was at the opening of his sack, our silver in its full weight; and we returned it in our hand. First we wish to return the money, which was no doubt placed in our sacks by mistake.
Additionally, we brought down other silver in our hand to acquire food. We do not know who placed our silver in our sacks. It is not our fault, and we do not know how it happened, but we will certainly pay for everything.
He, the steward, said to them: Peace be with you, fear not; your God and the God of your father, gave you hidden treasure in your sacks; your silver came to me. The money you are obliged to pay has already reached me. It is possible that Joseph, an organized, honest man, had instructed that the payment for the brothers’ food be placed in the royal treasury, which meant that he had placed a gift in their sacks at his own expense. And he, the steward, brought Simeon out to them, presumably in accordance with instructions he had received.
The man brought the men to Joseph’s house as the viceroy’s guests. He gave them water after their long, tiring journey, and they washed their feet, and he gave feed to their donkeys. He took care of all their needs.
They, the brothers, prepared the gift Jacob had sent with them, which up to that point had remained wrapped up on the donkey. They arranged it in a presentable manner until Joseph’s arrival at noon, because they heard that they would eat bread there. Since they had heard from the man that they would be staying to eat with Joseph, they knew that they would have the opportunity to present him with their gift.
Joseph came home, and they brought him the gift that was in their hand to the house, and they prostrated themselves to him to the earth. This is the fulfillment of Joseph’s first dream: His eleven brothers, who now seek grain and are waiting to eat at Joseph’s table, were depicted in the dream as sheaves gathered around and prostrating to his sheaf (37:7).
Their friendly welcome continues, as Joseph himself acts in a friendly manner toward his brothers. He asked them with regard to their wellbeing, and he also said: Is all well with your elderly father whom you mentioned; is he still alive?
They said: All is well with your servant, with our father, he is still alive; they bowed, and they prostrated themselves as a mark of respect and gratitude to the viceroy who had bestowed honor upon them by inquiring into their welfare and asking about their father’s health.
He lifted his eyes and saw his brother Benjamin, his mother’s son, and he said: Is this your youngest brother whom you mentioned to me that you would bring here? He, Joseph, then said: God be gracious to you, my son. Due to Benjamin’s youth, Joseph addressed him as a son.
Joseph hurried, because his mercy was aroused toward his brother, whom he had not seen for many years, and he sought to weep; therefore, he quickly entered the chamber, his private room, and wept there.
He washed his face to hide the fact that he had been weeping and emerged, and he restrained himself and said to his attendants: Serve bread.
They served bread for him by himself, and for them by themselves, and for the Egyptians who were eating with him by themselves. His Egyptian associates and household members had their own table. This was yet another cause of confusion for the brothers: Although he was to all appearances Egyptian, the viceroy chose not to eat with the other Egyptians. The separation between the Egyptians and the Hebrews was because the Egyptians may not eat bread with the Hebrews, as it is an abomination for the Egyptians. The religion of the Egyptians prohibited them from dining with Hebrews.
As their host, Joseph seated his brothers around the table. They sat before him in the places assigned by Joseph, the firstborn according to his seniority and the younger according to his youth, in age order. And the men wondered to one another. Since the differences in age between Jacob’s sons were not great, an outsider would not be able to tell the age order of these grown men.
He gave them gifts from before him, and Benjamin’s gift was five times greater than the gifts of all of them, the other brothers. They drank and became inebriated with him. The meal took on a friendly, even celebratory tone.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 44
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 44 somebodyHe commanded the one in charge of his house, saying: Fill the men’s sacks with food, as much as the sacks are able to carry, and place each man’s silver at the opening of his sack, as on the previous occasion,
However, this time Joseph added another instruction: Place my special goblet, the silver goblet, at the opening of the sack of the youngest brother. In ancient Egypt, silver was occasionally even more valuable than gold, as there were gold deposits in East Africa and other places near Egypt, whereas silver was mostly imported from Asia. Joseph continued: And also insert into the sacks the silver of his purchase of the grain. He, Joseph’s servant, did in accordance with the statement that Joseph had spoken.
It is likely that the brothers had arrived in the afternoon and stayed overnight in Joseph’s house. The next morning broke, and the men were dispatched, they and their donkeys.
They left the city; they had not gone far, and Joseph said to the one in charge of his house: Arise now and pursue the men and overtake them, and say to them: Why have you repaid evil for good? Joseph accused his brothers of theft.
Isn’t this goblet that you stole from Joseph’s house that in which my lord drinks, and moreover, isn’t it the goblet with which he divines? It is no ordinary goblet, but the one with which he performs his divinations. You have done evil in what you did. By stealing the goblet from your host, you have displayed both ingratitude and stupidity, as naturally your theft was discovered immediately.
He overtook them, and he spoke to them those words.
They said to him: Why would my lord speak words like those? Heaven forfend for your servants to act in that manner. It is utterly absurd to suspect us of such a deed, as proven by our actions:
Behold, the silver that we found in the opening of our sacks we returned to you from the land of Canaan. Although the steward in charge of Joseph’s house informed us that we owe nothing, and that the money we found was our treasure, we had brought it with us all the way from Canaan due to the possibility that we owed this money. How would we steal from the house of your lord silver or gold?
Since they were fully confident that none of them had stolen anything, the brothers declared: With whomever of your servants it, the goblet, is found, he shall die, and we too, all of us, will be slaves to my lord.
He said: Now too, it should be in accordance with your words: The criminal deserves the death sentence, and the rest of you, as his accomplices, should become slaves. Nevertheless, I have a more generous offer: He with whom it shall be found shall be a slave to me. I have no intention of putting him to death, but I will take him as a slave; and the rest of you shall be exonerated. Since you did not commit the crime, you will be spared all punishment. 16
Each man hurried and lowered his sack to the ground, and each man opened his sack for inspection.
He, the steward, searched; he began with the eldest, and with the youngest he concluded. He proceeded in this manner both out of politeness and because if he had gone straight to Benjamin’s sack and found the goblet immediately, it would have looked suspicious. He therefore conducted the search in accordance with the brothers’ ages. The goblet was found in Benjamin’s sack.
They rent their garments in shock, shame, helplessness, and terror at the implications of this discovery. The act of rending was also a mark of mourning. Each man loaded his sack onto his donkey, and they returned to the city.
Judah and his brethren came to Joseph’s house, and he, Joseph, was still there. Joseph had, of course, good reason to remain in his house. Once again they fell before him to the ground.
Joseph said to them, in the manner of an important minister: What is this deed that you have done? Don’t you know that a man who is like me will practice divination? By now you are aware of my wisdom and greatness. Did you not fear that I would discover what had happened to my goblet? I cannot comprehend the reason for this foolish act. 17
Judah said: What shall we say to my lord, what shall we speak, and how shall we justify ourselves? After all, the goblet was found in our possession. God has revealed the iniquity of your servants. We cannot account for this matter; it was arranged by Heaven. Behold, we are my lord’s slaves, both we and he in whose possession the goblet was found. Since we came as a single group, take us all as slaves.
He, Joseph, said: Heaven forfend that I should do so. I will not act unjustly. The man in whose hand the goblet was found, he shall be my slave as a punishment; and as for the rest of you, who presumably knew nothing about the offense, I have no claim against you. Therefore, go up in peace to your father.
Judah approached him, Joseph. Judah stands out here from the rest of the brothers as their leader, who takes responsibility for dealing with the situation. And Judah said: Please, my lord, may your servant speak a word in my lord’s ears? I do not wish simply to accept or reject your suggestion, but to explain to you the series of events that led us to this confrontation, as I understand them. Do not become incensed with your servant if I repeat in my own style some information that you already know, as to us you are like Pharaoh. You are the most distinguished person in this place, and therefore I will not fail to address you with reverence and honor; nevertheless, I ask permission to speak my mind.
In our previous encounter, among other questions, my lord asked his servants the following, saying: Do you have a father or a brother?
We said to my lord: We have an elderly father, and a relatively young son of his old age; his brother, the brother of this young son, is dead, and he alone remains from his mother. He is the lone surviving son of his mother, and in addition to these bare facts, his father loves him above all.
You said to your servants: Bring him down to me, and I will set my eye upon him. I will treat him well and pay special attention to him.
We said to my lord: The lad cannot leave his father; for if he leaves his father, then he, the father, would die.
You said to your servants: Nevertheless, if your youngest brother does not come down with you, you shall not see my face again.
It was when we went up to your servant, my father, that we told him the words of my lord.
Eventually, our father said: Return, acquire us a little food.
We said: We cannot go down to Egypt in the same manner as before; if our youngest brother is with us, we will go down, for we cannot see the man’s face unless our youngest brother is with us.
Your servant, my father, said to us: You know that my wife bore me two sons;
the one departed from me, and I said in conjecture: Surely he was mauled. Jacob could not be certain of this claim, as Joseph’s body had not been found; however, there was circumstantial evidence that this was Joseph’s fate. And I have not seen him since;
and if you will take this one too from my presence, and a disaster will befall him, you will thereby cause my old age to descend in woe to the grave. My old age will be even worse than it currently is, and I will be overcome with misery when I pass on from the world.
Until this point, Judah has been recounting previous events. He now begins to offer his own thoughts: Now, when I come home to your servant, my father, and the lad is not with us, and his, my father’s, soul is bound with his son’s soul,
it will be when he sees that the lad is not with us; he will die from excessive grief. Your servants will cause the old age of your servant, my father, to descend in sorrow to the grave. We will have caused our father’s death.
Judah now explains why he is the one speaking on behalf of his brothers: For your servant personally guaranteed the lad to my father, saying: If I do not bring him to you, I will have sinned to my father forever, and my transgression will accompany me always.
Now, please, as it is my responsibility to ensure that Benjamin returns home at whatever cost, I suggest the following: Your servant will remain in place of the lad as a slave to my lord. Take me for a slave in his place; and the lad shall go up, return home, with his brothers.
For how will I go up to my father, and the lad is not with me? I cannot go, lest I see the woe that shall find my father. I am unable to bear the thought of my father’s reaction, and I will do anything to avoid witnessing it with my own eyes. Of course Jacob would not be pleased even if a different brother had to remain as a slave in Egypt, but due to his exceptional love for Benjamin, his loss would be far worse if Joseph’s demand were accepted.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 45
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 45 somebodyJoseph could not restrain from revealing himself, but he nevertheless held back before all those standing before him so as not to embarrass his brothers publicly by disclosing to the servants and guards that were present the fact that they had sold him to Egypt. 1 And he called: Remove every man from before me. No other man stood with him when Joseph revealed himself to his brothers. Another explanation for Joseph’s instructions is that his servants supported Judah’s proposal and attempted to convince Joseph to accept it, as the lost goblet had been found. Furthermore, Judah’s noble offer had left a profound impression on them. Joseph therefore requested that they exit the room. 2
He raised his voice in weeping. Joseph had wept previously, but now he was able to cry openly in his brothers’ presence and did not have to exit the room to do so. 3 The Egyptians heard, and the house of Pharaoh heard. Although the Egyptians who had been present had moved to another room or left the house entirely, they could still hear the sound of his weeping.
Joseph said to his brothers: I am Joseph, and then immediately asked: Does my father still live? And his brothers could not answer him because they were alarmed before him. Joseph, of course, knew who they were the entire time, but the brothers were overcome by confusion and fear over the sudden revelation. Until now, they considered Joseph to be lost, even if they may have dreamt that one day they would discover him as a slave somewhere and possibly even free him. However, now he is present before them as an eminent personality, their apparent antagonist, the ruler in whose hands their fate rests.
Joseph said to his brothers: Please approach me, and they approached silently, as they were not yet able to speak. He said again: I am Joseph your brother whom you sold to Egypt. In this repetition he is no longer revealing his identity; rather, Joseph is emphasizing that he is still their brother.
However, now all that is in the past; do not be sad, and do not become incensed with yourselves that you sold me here; it was for sustenance that God sent me before you. If you wish, you can consider the entire matter from a different perspective. Look at all that transpired in the wake of the sale. Because I was taken to Egypt, I am now capable of supporting our family.
For these past two years the famine is in the midst of the land, and there are an additional five years during which there shall be neither plowing nor harvest, in accordance with Pharaoh’s dream.
God sent me before you to establish for you a remnant in the land, as I will support you, and to sustain you for a great deliverance.
Joseph continues to placate his brothers: Now, you should know that it was not you who sent me here, but God, as you were simply the intermediaries for this great mission. He made me into a father to Pharaoh, a guardian of his kingdom, and into a lord for all his house, and ruler over the entire land of Egypt.
Hurry and go up to my father and say to him: So said your son Joseph: God has made me lord for all Egypt. Now, come down to me to Egypt; do not tarry.
You will live in the land of Goshen, which is on the eastern border of Egypt, near the land of Canaan, and you will be near to me, you, and your children, and your children’s children, and your flocks, and your cattle, and everything that you have.
I will sustain you there, as the Egyptian harvest was more stable than that of Canaan. Even if the produce of this harvest does not suffice, I will make sure to provide you with all of your needs. For there are an additional five years of famine; lest you become impoverished, you, and your household, and everything that you have. If you have to continue to purchase food from Egypt, you will eventually be forced to sell all your property.
Behold, your eyes see, and the eyes of my brother Benjamin, that it is my mouth that is speaking to you in your language. 4 Prior to this point, Joseph had spoken in Egyptian, and the dialogue with the brothers had proceeded with the assistance of an interpreter. In addition to his change of language, here he soothes his brothers by equating them to Benjamin, his maternal brother, who did not participate in the plot against him.
You shall tell my father all my glory in Egypt, and all that you have seen with regard to my capabilities as a ruler; hurry and bring my father down here.
He fell upon the neck of his brother Benjamin, which he was finally able to do freely, and wept over his reuniting with his maternal brother; and Benjamin wept upon his neck, following his elder brother’s example.
He then kissed all his brothers and wept upon them. As mentioned previously, although Joseph was a powerful ruler he could quickly become emotional. 5 The brothers’ shock at the discovery that the ruler of the land was none other than Joseph was replaced by their concern that he might take revenge upon them, a worry that had not abated even many years after they had sold him. They knew that if he sought to punish them, justice would be on his side. And only afterward, upon hearing his statement and seeing his tears and emotion as he approached them, their fears were assuaged, and his brothers spoke with him.
The news was heard in Pharaoh’s house. The men who had been sent outside and were now stationed in the courtyard could hear Joseph crying. Presumably, some had listened through the window or in some similar manner. Consequently, the members of Pharaoh’s household heard the news, saying: Joseph’s brothers have come. Although they could not understand the language that was spoken, they grasped the essence of what had transpired. And it was good in the eyes of Pharaoh and the eyes of his servants. Until now, Pharaoh and the Egyptians had considered Joseph no more than a slave, who presumably came from a family of slaves. Despite his proficiency and success, it was still a disgrace for them to have a slave as their ruler. Therefore, they were pleased to hear that Joseph in fact came from a distinguished family and had originally been a free man.
Pharaoh said to Joseph: Say to your brothers: Do this: Load your animals, and go, and come to the land of Canaan . This suggestion is similar to Joseph’s. Pharaoh might have thought of it independently or heard about the idea from Joseph; either way, he agreed to the plan.
Take your father and the members of your households from Canaan, and come to me and remain in my care in Egypt; I will give you the finest of the land of Egypt, and eat the fat of the land. As Joseph’s brothers and family, you will enjoy all of the benefits that I can offer to those with connections to the royal palace.
To Joseph, Pharaoh said: You are commanded, do this: Take wagons from the land of Egypt. Wagons were rare in Canaan, as they were generally used in cultures more developed than that of shepherds such as the family of Jacob. Use these wagons for your children and for your wives, so that they not experience discomfort on their journey to Egypt. As for the males, they can ride on animals. And in this manner, convey your father and come.
Your eye should not spare your vessels. Do not be concerned about any possessions that might be damaged on your journey, or about items that you are forced to leave at home. In addition, do not travel slowly due to worry over losing your property, for the bounty of the entire land of Egypt is yours, and all your requirements will be met at my expense.
The sons of Israel did so and prepared to return home. Joseph gave them wagons by Pharaoh’s order, and he gave them provisions for the journey. The use of wagons together with strong animals allowed them to take plenty of food, as well as other items.
To all of them he gave each man changes of garments for the journey, and to Benjamin he gave three hundred pieces of silver, as a special gift to his beloved brother, and five changes of garments.
To his father he sent a gift as follows: Ten donkeys laden with the bounty of Egypt, including clothing, vessels, and preserved foods, and ten female donkeys laden with grain, and bread, and food for his father for the journey. During their trip to Canaan, the brothers would certainly endeavor to minimize the amount of food they consumed and to reach their destination as fast as possible. In contrast, the family’s journey to Egypt with the elderly Jacob, their wives, children, and all of their possessions would take significantly longer. Therefore, that journey required far more provisions.
He sent his brothers back to their home, and they went. Following their shocking experience in Egypt, the brothers were liable to blame each other for the selling of Joseph during the trip home. Reuben and Judah both had a certain amount of mercy on their brother and attempted to delay or foil the attempt to kill him, but it is unclear how many of the other brothers, aside from Judah (see 37:26), were active participants in the sale and how many merely refrained from preventing it. Apparently, until now they considered themselves active participants. Now, when it became evident that Joseph was alive and his status was more powerful than theirs, they might use the journey to rehash past events. 6 Consequently, he said to them: Do not quarrel on the way.
They went up from Egypt, and they came to the land of Canaan, to Jacob their father.
They told him, saying: Joseph still lives, and he is ruler over the entire land of Egypt. It is difficult to ascertain whether they presented their father with all the details of the story, or whether they preferred not to mention the events for which they themselves were responsible. It is also unknown whether Jacob ever discovered what had actually happened to Joseph. 7 His heart was faint; it ceased to beat, and perhaps he fainted out of shock, because he did not believe them, as he was not prepared for this astonishing news. Alternatively, he did not trust them and suspected that they had invented the story for some personal benefit.
Due to Jacob’s reaction, they spoke to him in detail all the words of Joseph that he had said to them, and he saw the wagons that Joseph sent to convey him. The presence of the Egyptian wagons, which generally were used for military functions and were not easily transported out of Egypt, corroborated their story. And the spirit of Jacob their father was revived from his faintness, as he gradually became convinced that the report was indeed true. The knowledge that Joseph was alive shocked him, but also revived him.
Israel said: It is enough that Joseph my son is still alive; I need no more than this. 8 I will go and see him before I die. Jacob’s transformation is expressed in the change of his name back to Israel, the name given to him by God (35:10).
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 46
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 46 somebodyIsrael and everything that he had traveled. He likely departed from Hebron, where he lived, and he came to Beersheba, which was located in the south, on the road to Egypt. Apparently, he specifically chose to pass this important landmark, where both Abraham and Isaac had constructed altars, just as he had on his initial journey to Haran (28:10). And there he slaughtered offerings to the God of his father Isaac.
God spoke to Israel in the visions of the night, either a dream or a vision similar to a dream, and said: Jacob, Jacob; and he said: Here I am.
Since Jacob did not see an image but merely heard a voice, God explicitly states that He is the one speaking. He said: I am the God, the God of your father; do not fear to go down to Egypt, as I will make you a great nation there. This promise, that the family of Jacob would be transformed into a nation in Egypt, addressed the concern that they might assimilate into the society of this foreign land.
I will go down with you to Egypt and help you there; and I will also take you up again from Egypt, though not necessarily in your lifetime. You will merit seeing your beloved son, and furthermore, Joseph shall place his hand over your eyes, as he will care for you when you die. It is likely that the act of a son placing his hand over his father’s eyes was part of the preparation ceremony for burial. This final contact of son and father was an expression of closeness and honor. To this day there is a custom among some communities to perform this action upon the death of a father, based on this verse.
Jacob arose from Beersheba. It was easier for him to leave the land of Canaan with God’s approval and His promise to accompany him to a foreign land. And the sons of Israel conveyed Jacob their father, and their children, and their wives, in the wagons that Pharaoh had sent to convey him. The sons rode on the animals, while the elderly and frail Jacob sat in the wagons together with the wives and children.
They took their livestock, which as shepherds was their primary possession, and their movable property that they had acquired in the land of Canaan, and they came to Egypt: Jacob, and all his descendants with him.
His sons and his sons’ sons came with him, his daughters, his daughter and daughters-in-law, as the Torah mentions only one daughter born to Jacob: Dina, and his sons’ daughters, his granddaughter and the wives of his grandsons, as in the following verses only one granddaughter is mentioned: Serah 9 (see 46:17). And all his descendants he brought with him to Egypt.
And these are the names of the children of Israel, the children of Jacob, who ultimately became the heads of families of the Jewish people, who were coming to Egypt, Jacob and his sons: the firstborn of Jacob, Reuben.
And the sons of Reuben: Hanokh, Palu, Hetzron, and Karmi.
The sons of Simeon: Jemuel, Yamin, Ohad, Yakhin, Tzohar, and Shaul, son of the Canaanite woman. This unusual mention of a Canaanite woman might serve to emphasize that none of the other children were the offspring of Canaanites. 10
The sons of Levi: Gershon, Kehat, and Merari.
The sons of Judah: Er, Onan, Shela, who were born to him from the daughter of Shua, Peretz and Zerah, from Tamar; Er and Onan died in the land of Canaan. And the sons of Peretz, who married at a young age and therefore had children prior to the descent to Egypt, were Hetzron and Hamul.
The sons of Issachar: Tola, Puva, Yov, and Shimron.
The sons of Zebulun: Sered, Elon, and Yahle’el.
The list of Jacob’s children is arranged by the maternal line. These are the sons of Leah, whom she bore to Jacob in Padan Aram, with his daughter Dina; all the people, his sons and his daughters, thirty-three.
The sons of Gad: Ziphion, Hagi, Shuni, Etzbon, Eri, Arodi, and Areli.
The sons of Asher: Yimna, Yishva, Yishvi, Beria, and Serah their sister. Perhaps this granddaughter is mentioned because she was the only one born in Canaan. Alternatively, there were other unidentified granddaughters as well, but Serah had a unique personality. The Sages relate that she was very close to Jacob and that she merited numerous blessings, including exceptional longevity. 11 And the sons of Beria: Hever and Malkiel.
These are the sons of Zilpa, whom Laban gave to Leah his daughter; she bore these to Jacob, sixteen souls. The sons of Zilpa form the second largest group, almost half the size of the group of the sons of Leah.
The sons of Rachel, Jacob’s wife: Joseph and Benjamin. Although Joseph did not travel with his brothers to Egypt, he is included in the list of the children of Israel who were there after they all arrived.
To Joseph in the land of Egypt were born, whom Asenat, daughter of Poti Fera, priest of On, bore to him, Manasseh and Ephraim. These three, Joseph and his two sons, are members of the house of Jacob who were already in Egypt. They are mentioned separately again at the conclusion of the count (verse 27).
The sons of Benjamin: Bela, Bekher, Ashbel, Gera, Naaman, Ehi, Rosh, Mupim, Hupim, and Ard.
These are the sons of Rachel, who were born to Jacob; all the people of the descendants of Rachel, including Joseph and his two sons, were fourteen.
The sons of Dan: Hushim. Although Hushim, who is also called Shuham, 12 was the only son of Dan, he is referred to here as “the sons of Dan,” probably due to his numerous descendants, the family of Shuham. For similar usage of the plural terminology, see Numbers 26:8 and II Samuel 23:32.
The sons of Naphtali: Yahtze’el, Guni, Yetzer, and Shilem.
These are the sons of Bilha, whom Laban gave to Rachel his daughter, and these she bore to Jacob; all the people were seven. As in the case of Zilpa and Leah, the descendants of Bilha numbered half of those of her mistress, Rachel.
All the people who were coming with Jacob to Egypt, the products of his loins, aside from the wives of Jacob’s sons, all the people were sixty-six.
The sons of Joseph, who were born to him in Egypt, were two people. If these are counted together with Joseph, and Jacob is also included, then all the people of the house of Jacob, who came to Egypt, were seventy . 13 Alternatively, the number seventy is rounded up from sixty-nine. 14
He, Jacob, sent Judah, who in their encounter with Joseph had become the brothers’ representative, before him to Joseph, to guide him to Goshen. Judah was to show them how precisely to get to Goshen, where they would live, in accordance with Joseph’s plan (45:10). And they subsequently came to the land of Goshen.
Joseph harnessed his chariot and went up toward Israel his father to Goshen, and he, Joseph, appeared to him, Jacob, fell upon his neck, hugging his father, and in his overwhelming emotion, wept on his neck prodigiously.
Israel said to Joseph: I can die now in peace after my seeing your face, for you are still alive, as I myself have witnessed. I traveled here to see you, and now that we have reunited, I have received all that I could wish for and I lack nothing in life.
Joseph said to his brothers and to his father’s household: I will go up to the capital city and tell Pharaoh the news, and I will say to him: My brothers, and my father’s household who were in the land of Canaan, came to me.
The men of my family are shepherds, as they are people of livestock, which has always been their profession; and they have brought their flocks, and their cattle, and everything that they have. I will tell this to Pharaoh, as he might want to meet you personally.
It shall be when Pharaoh shall call you and say: What is your occupation?
You shall say: Your servants have been people of livestock from our youth until now, both we and our fathers; so that you may live in the land of Goshen, for every shepherd is an abomination for the Egyptians. The Egyptians despised shepherding, as it involved the killing of animals, which was against their religion and considered an affront to its believers.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 47
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 47 somebodyJoseph went and told Pharaoh and said: My father and my brothers, and their flocks, and their cattle, and everything that they have, have come from the land of Canaan, and behold, they are in the land of Goshen. It is possible that there was a general regulation in Egypt that shepherds must dwell in Goshen. If so, Joseph reported to Pharaoh that the directive was carried out in this case.
From among his brothers he took five men, and he presented them before Pharaoh. Perhaps Joseph did not deem it appropriate to present all of his eleven brothers, and therefore he selected a few to represent the group. The Sages suggest that Joseph specifically chose those who did not appear particularly strong, to avoid the possibility that Pharaoh would draft them into the Egyptian army. 15 Both Joseph and the brothers were interested in maintaining peaceful relations with Pharaoh so that they could remain in Goshen and pursue their livelihoods untroubled.
As Joseph expected, Pharaoh said to his brothers: What is your occupation? They said to Pharaoh, in accordance with Joseph’s advice: Your servants are shepherds, both we and our fathers.
They further said to Pharaoh: We have come to reside temporarily in the land, not to settle permanently, because there is no pasture for your servants’ flocks, as the famine is severe in the land of Canaan. Now, please, if this is acceptable, may your servants live in the land of Goshen?
After hearing the brothers’ suggestion, Pharaoh chose not to continue the conversation with them, but turned to Joseph instead. Pharaoh spoke to Joseph, saying: Your father and your brothers have come to you.
The land of Egypt is before you, at your disposal; settle your father and your brothers in the best of the land, as I accept their request; they shall live in the land of Goshen, as this is indeed the appropriate location, and if you know any capable and successful men among them, set them chief herders over that which is mine. Although the Egyptians were not shepherds, they did possess some livestock, which was designated not for consumption but for wool, milk, and other such purposes.
Joseph brought Jacob his father, and stood him before Pharaoh. Due to Jacob’s status, his meeting and exchange with Pharaoh differed from that of the brothers. And Jacob blessed Pharaoh. This was probably an accepted formal blessing bestowed upon a king when one enters into an audience with him.
Pharaoh said to Jacob: How many are the days of the years of your life? Jacob appeared exceptionally old to Pharaoh, who inquired into his age out of curiosity or possibly due to etiquette.
Jacob said to Pharaoh: The days of the years of my residing in this world, the years of his life, which he considered a temporary period of wandering, are one hundred and thirty years; few and unfavorable have been the days of the years of my life. Although I have lived longer than many others, I am not exceptionally old. Rather, I appear older than my actual age due to my sufferings. 16 And yet they, my years, have not reached the days of the years of the life of my fathers in the days of their residing, as Abraham and Isaac lived much longer than I have.
Jacob blessed Pharaoh and departed from the presence of Pharaoh.
Joseph settled his father and his brothers and gave them a portion in the land of Egypt, in the best of the land, in the land of Rameses, in Goshen, as Pharaoh commanded.
Joseph provided for his father, his brothers, and his father’s entire household, with bread into the mouths of the children. Despite the lack of a large quantity of food, Joseph was able to provide for the needs of his entire family. 17
There was no bread in all the land, as the famine was very severe, and the land of Egypt and the land of Canaan languished due to the famine.
Since he had amassed grain in Pharaoh’s emergency storehouses, Joseph proceeded to sell it, and thereby collected all the silver that was found in the land of Egypt and in the land of Canaan for the grain which they, the people, were purchasing. Joseph, a faithful agent, brought the large amount of silver to Pharaoh’s house.
After the majority of the population had exhausted the remainder of their produce and had also spent all their savings, the silver was exhausted in the land of Egypt and in the land of Canaan; all the Egyptians came to Joseph, saying: Give us bread to eat; and why should we die in your presence because any silver with which we could purchase food has run out?
Joseph said: Give your livestock, and I will give you food in exchange for your livestock, if silver has run out.
They brought their livestock to Joseph; Joseph gave them bread for the horses, for the livestock of flocks, for the livestock of cattle, and for the donkeys; in exchange for all their livestock he provided them with bread during that year, the second year of the famine.
That year concluded, and they came to him in the second year, the next year, 18 and said to him: We will not conceal from my lord how our silver and the herds of cattle are spent to my lord; nothing remains of our movable property before my lord, except for our bodies and our lands.
Why shall we die before your eyes, both we and our land, if it becomes barren? Purchase us and our land with bread, and we and our land will be slaves to Pharaoh. In essence, the people were suggesting that their status be changed from Egyptian citizens and independent farmers into Pharaoh’s serfs. Give seed that we will live and will not die, and the land will not become desolate.
Joseph purchased all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh because each Egyptian sold his field, for the famine was severe upon them. The land became Pharaoh’s. Once Pharaoh acquired the land, it became his personal property. Likewise, when he purchased the citizens of Egypt, all the farmers became his slaves.
The people, he transferred them to the cities, from one end of the Egyptian border to its other end. The aim of this population transfer was to highlight the fact that the people no longer owned any land and were considered slaves. A person who lives on a particular plot of land, even if he does not possess complete legal ownership of it, still feels that it belongs to him to a certain extent. Joseph transferred and scattered the people in order to uproot their sense that they were living in their homeland, and to eradicate their feelings of ownership and attachment to the soil. They are now sent to work in unfamiliar locations as slaves, with no say in the matter.
The verse notes exception to the above rule: Only the land of the priests he, Joseph, did not buy, for there was an exact allotment of food designated for the priests from Pharaoh, and they ate their allotment that Pharaoh gave them; therefore, they did not sell their land. Since the Egyptian priests did not starve, they were not compelled to sell themselves or their land.
Joseph said to the people: Behold, I have purchased you today and your land for Pharaoh. Here is seed for you, and you shall sow the land. Since Pharaoh was now the owner of the land, it was in his best interest to invest in its development by providing the people with seeds. It is evident from this verse that the famine had become more moderate in Egypt. However, in more distant lands, such as Canaan, it was still causing significant damage, which was preventing any substantial recovery. The residents of these lands were incapable of planting anything, as all the seeds had been consumed. The famine continued in this manner for several years until the populace was able to recover.
In contrast to the situation in other lands, Joseph offered the residents of Egypt seeds to plant, but he also demanded something in return: It shall be at the harvests, after the crops sprout, that you shall give one-fifth of the crop to Pharaoh, and four parts, the four-fifths that will remain in your possession, shall be yours, for seed of the field, and for your food, and for those in your households, and to be eaten by your children.
They said: You have saved our lives. Let us find favor in the eyes of my lord. Please do as you suggested, as this is a generous offer. In their satisfaction, they willingly added: And we will be slaves to Pharaoh.
Joseph instituted it, his condition, as a statute to this day with regard to the land of Egypt: One-fifth of the land was for Pharaoh; only the land of the priests alone did not become Pharaoh’s. As was previously mentioned, the priests, who received support directly from the king, did not sell their land or themselves (verse 22).
Israel, which is used here for the first time as the title of the entire tribe, rather than the individual name of Jacob, lived in the land of Egypt, in the land of Goshen; they settled there. Jacob and his family lived in comfortable conditions, without worries. They dealt with their occupations, while Joseph provided their sustenance. And consequently, they were fruitful and multiplied exceedingly.
Jacob lived in the land of Egypt seventeen years. During this time, the economic reforms described in the previous section (verses 14–26) were instituted, and the famine ceased. The days of Jacob, the years of his life, were seven years and one hundred atnd forty years.
The time for Israel to die approached, as he sensed that he would soon pass away. And he called his son, Joseph, both because he was his favorite son, and because he was the ruler of Egypt, and he said to him: Please, if I have found favor in your eyes, please place your hand under my thigh and swear to me (see 24:2) that you will perform kindness and truth with me; please do not bury me in Egypt. Jacob felt the need to administer an oath to Joseph, since this was not a simple request, as will be seen below.
I shall lie with my fathers after my death, and you will convey me from Egypt and bury me in their, my ancestors’, grave. He, Joseph, said: I will do in accordance with your words.
He, Jacob, said: Take an oath to me, as a declaration of intent alone is insufficient. And he, Joseph, took an oath to him. Israel prostrated himself as a sign of gratitude at the head of the bed. He did not prostrate himself on the ground, in the customary manner, as he was ill and confined to bed.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 48
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 48 somebodyIt was after these matters that one, an unnamed person, said to Joseph: Behold, your father is ill. In the previous episode, Jacob had sensed that he was going to die soon; at this point, he became very ill. He, Joseph, took his two sons, Manasseh and Ephraim, with him.
One told Jacob and said: Behold, your son Joseph is coming to you. Joseph likely lived in the capital city, which was far from Goshen, and therefore he could not visit his father frequently. When he was notified that Joseph was coming to visit, Israel exerted himself, and he sat upon the bed instead of lying on it, as he wanted to greet the viceroy in a dignified manner. In addition, perhaps sitting was the more appropriate position for the nature of the conversation that Jacob wished to conduct with his son.
Jacob said to Joseph: God Almighty appeared to me in Luz, also known as Beit El, in the land of Canaan, and He blessed me.
He said to me: Behold, I will make you fruitful and multiply you, and I will render you an assembly of peoples, and I will give this land to your descendants after you as an eternal portion. Jacob received these two promises in his dream at Beit El on his way to Haran (28:12–15) and in his prophetic vision in the same location many years later, upon his return to Canaan (35:9–12). Although the greatness he was promised had yet to materialize, the assurance gave him the strength and authority to deliver blessings that would shape the future of his family and their land, as though God’s promises had already come to pass at that time.
And now, based on the aforementioned promises, your two sons, who were born to you in the land of Egypt before my coming to you to Egypt, they are mine; I am adopting them as though they were my children. Ephraim and Manasseh, like Reuben and Simeon they shall be for me. Your first and second sons, my grandsons, will be elevated to equivalent status as that of my own first and second sons.
Manasseh and Ephraim were Joseph’s older sons, born before the onset of the years of famine. Even if no children had been born to Joseph during the famine, as the Sages maintain, he likely had others after those difficult years. However, as they were still young at this point, the matter that Jacob is discussing does not apply to them. And therefore, your progeny that you beget after them, after Manasseh and Ephraim, they shall be yours and considered part of your immediate family, not as my adopted sons. This means that they shall be called after the name of their brothers in their inheritance. When the inheritance is divided among the sons of Jacob, those sons shall be considered part of the tribe of Ephraim or of Manasseh.
And I, when coming back from Padan Aram, your mother Rachel died on me in the land of Canaan on the road, while still some distance to arrive at Efrat, not in an inhabited area. And therefore I buried her there on the road to Efrat, which is another name for Bethlehem. Since it was impractical to bring her to the family burial plot in Hebron, I buried her where she died. 1 Indeed, to this day the tombstone assumed to mark Rachel’s grave is located outside the city of Bethlehem. In the past, it was presumably even farther outside of the city than it is currently. 2
Israel saw Joseph’s sons, and he said: Who are these? Perhaps due to the distance between Joseph’s and Jacob’s places of residence, Jacob did not see his grandchildren very often, and therefore he did not recognize them. Although he had met them a few years earlier, their appearances had certainly changed in the meantime. Moreover, Jacob’s vision had deteriorated (verse 10), which may be why he did not immediately identify his grandsons.
Joseph said to his father: They are my sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, whom you mentioned previously, whom God has given me here. Jacob subsequently remembers and identifies the boys. Despite his physical impairment, his mental capacities were still fully intact. Therefore, he said decisively: Please take them to me, and I will bless them.
And the eyes of Israel were heavy with age. At that time there was no way to cure the degeneration of vision in old age. Once one’s vision became cloudy, one could distinguish only between light and darkness. Therefore, he was unable to see anything other than shadows. He, Joseph, had them approach him and he, Jacob, kissed them, and he embraced them.
Israel said to Joseph: I did not expect to see your face after so many years, as I did not believe it was possible, and behold, not only has this occurred, but God has shown me your offspring as well. Before bestowing his blessing, Jacob strengthens himself through this expression of amazement and praise.
Manasseh and Ephraim, who were still young at the time, had been standing between Joseph’s knees. Joseph took them out from between his knees, and he prostrated himself on his face to the earth. Joseph bowed not to Jacob, but to God, in preparation for the upcoming revelation. 3
Joseph took the two of them: He brought Ephraim, his younger son, in his right hand, so that he would be to the left of Israel, who was opposite him, with the younger son on his father’s left side, in the customary manner. And he took Manasseh, his older son, in his left hand, to the right of Israel, and he had them approach him.
Contrary to Joseph’s expectation that Jacob would extend his hands directly across onto his sons’ heads, Israel extended his right hand, which was opposite Manasseh, and laid it upon the head of Ephraim, who was the younger brother, and his left hand he extended upon the head of Manasseh, deliberately placing his hands , 4 as he was aware that Manasseh was the firstborn . 5 Alternatively, the verse means: Although Manasseh was the firstborn. 6
He, Jacob, blessed Joseph and said: The God before whom my fathers, Abraham and Isaac, walked, the God who shepherds, directs, me from my beginnings until this day. Although the blessing was bestowed upon Joseph’s children, a blessing given to children is also automatically a blessing for their father as well. 7
May the angel, a messenger of God, who delivers me from all evil and who has protected me until now, bless the lads, as the representative of God, its sender. And the first blessing is: Let my name and the name of my fathers, Abraham and Isaac, be called upon them, these two children, as well. Having previously adopted them as his own sons, Jacob adds that they shall continue his and his forebears’ legacy. Just as God guided Jacob and his fathers throughout their lives, so too He will lead his grandchildren. The second blessing is: May they proliferate like fish in the midst of the earth . 8
While Jacob was reciting the blessing, Joseph saw that his father had switched his hands, as he would lay his right hand upon the head of Ephraim, and it displeased him. Joseph expected Jacob to give preference to Manasseh, the firstborn, by placing his right hand upon him. Since his father’s vision was impaired, Joseph surmised that he had erred. Perhaps Joseph was displeased because he felt that Jacob thought that Joseph himself had mistakenly placed his sons on the wrong sides. In order to rectify what Joseph perceived as an error, he supported his father’s hand from below, to remove it from the head of Ephraim to the head of Manasseh.
Joseph also said explicitly to his father: Not so, my father, as this one, Manasseh, is the firstborn; place your right hand upon his head.
His father refused and said: I know, my son, I know which is the firstborn, despite my impaired vision. I am not withholding my blessing from the firstborn, Manasseh, as he too shall become a people, and he too shall be great. However, his younger brother Ephraim shall be greater than he with regard to the number of his descendants and their power, and his descendants shall be the plenitude of nations, as they will fill the world.
He blessed them that day, saying: By you shall Israel bless their children, saying: May God make you like Ephraim and like Manasseh, and he placed Ephraim before Manasseh in the text of the blessing. 9 In practice as well, Manasseh was given secondary status, despite the fact that he was the firstborn.
Israel said to Joseph: Behold, I am dying and will not return to the land of Canaan while I am alive. Although nothing was preventing his children from returning there at that time, Jacob knew prophetically that they would not return there in the near future. Nevertheless, he declared to his son: God will be with you, and He will eventually restore you to the land of your fathers.
Consequently, in my capacity as father and the transmitter of the inheritance, I have given to you one portion [ shekhem ] of an inheritance as a gift beyond that of your brothers. Instead of receiving one inheritance, your children will inherit two portions. This is the primary ramification of Ephraim and Manasseh being granted the status of Jacob’s adopted children, on the same level as the other tribes of Israel. This is the portion which I took from the hand of the Emorite with my sword and with my bow. The reference to shekhem here may mean that Jacob gave the city of Shekhem, to Joseph. Indeed, this city was included in the inheritance of his sons, and Joseph himself was buried there. 10
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 49
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 49 somebodyJacob called to his sons, and he said: Gather and I will tell you that which shall befall you at the end of days.
Assemble and hear, sons of Jacob, and heed Israel your father.
Jacob’s first few blessings follow his sons’ order of age. Reuben, you are my firstborn, my strength and the first of my potency; as the eldest, you were born when my strength was at its greatest. Therefore, you should have merited greater honor and greater power and ruled over your brothers. 11
However, because you were impetuous as water, you shall not excel, as you lost your precedence because you mounted your father’s bed, the bed of your father’ wife, which is the prime example of your impetuousness. Then you desecrated he who ascended my couch, yourself. 12 Alternatively, this is referring to the Divine Presence that resides there. 13 Others explain that the phrase “he who ascended [ ala ]” means “removed.” 14 In other words, from that day the couch, or Jacob’s honor, was removed, as he was forced to separate from Bilha due to this incident. Yet another explanation is that Jacob is saying to Reuben: You desecrated my bed and marital activities, which should have been above [ lema’ala ] and beyond your concerns; therefore, you forfeited your status as firstborn.
Simeon and Levi are brothers. These two brothers were apparently very close. They acted together, and Jacob likewise addresses them together. Weapons of villainy are their heritage. 15 They grew up using weapons from a young age.
My self shall not come in their company [ sodam ] . 16 Alternatively, this is referring to their secret [ sod ] actions. With their assembly may my glory not be associated; for in their anger they killed men, the inhabitants of Shekhem, and with their will they hamstrung oxen, they cut the legs of the oxen of those inhabitants, so that they no longer would be usable.
Cursed be their anger, as it is unacceptably fierce , 17 and their wrath, as it is too harsh; I will divide them in Jacob, and I will disperse them in Israel. They will continue to be identified as two tribes, but they will be scattered and will not inherit a permanent portion of land as their brothers will. It should be noted that Jacob did not curse Simeon and Levi themselves, but only their anger.
The Sages state that when Judah heard Jacob’s harsh comments to his three older brothers, he was concerned that his father would rebuke him as well, 18 as he too had sinned in the past. Indeed, he began to retreat in hesitation, but his father called him back: Judah, not only are you not inferior to the others, but you, your brothers shall acknowledge you and give you honor; since your hand shall be at the neck of your enemies, as you will subjugate them. In addition, your father’s sons shall prostrate themselves to you, for you will rule over your brothers.
Judah is the first of many of the sons to be compared to an animal. Judah is a lion cub; from prey, my son, you rose up. Like a predatory lion, you emerge from each battle with the upper hand. Alternatively, this is possibly an allusion to the sale of Joseph. Jacob, who by now was likely aware of the details of the story, states that Judah saved Joseph and prevented his death. 19 He crouched, lay like a lion; and like a great cat, who shall rouse him? Just as no one would challenge a rising lion, so too the tribe of Judah shall be full of warriors, and its fear shall be upon the surrounding region.
In addition to the fact that Judah will remain a tribe of warriors, the scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor the ruler’s staff, a writing tool with which the king writes laws, from between his feet, as his descendants shall continue to rule and legislate the law; until Shilo, the redeemer, the king to whom everything belongs [ shelo ], arrives. To him, nations shall assemble. The tribe of Judah shall continue to lead the people until the coming of the Messiah. 20
Jacob now grants Judah an economic blessing: He shall bind his foal to the vine and will not be concerned about its possible destruction, as grape vines will abound in his inheritance; and to the branch of the vine he shall bind his jenny’s foal. He launders his garments in wine. Due to the abundance of wine flowing from his grapes, he could use it not only for drinking, but also for laundering instead of water. And in the blood of grapes, wine, he shall launder his clothes.
Red-eyed from drinking much wine, and white-toothed from milk.
At this point, Jacob deviates from his sons’ birth order by placing the sons of Leah before those of the maidservants. He also changes the internal order of the sons of Leah, as Zebulun is blessed before the older Issachar. Zebulun shall dwell at the shore of seas; he shall be a shore for ships, as his inheritance will be on the shore of the Mediterranean Sea, and his border will be upon Sidon, as his portion was located in the north. Sidon was always a center of maritime commercial trade. It is possible that the tribe of Zebulun, located in close proximity to Sidon, had significant commercial ties to that city. Zebulun’s border might also have extended to the Sea of Galilee, but the reference here to the shore of seas, and a harbor for ships, refers specifically to the Mediterranean. 21
Issachar is a strong-boned donkey, lying between the sheep folds, places of pasture. Issachar is depicted here as a donkey lying tranquilly. There is nothing negative in this choice of animal, even though the word for donkey [ ĥamor ] was the name of the prince of Shekhem (see 34:2).
He saw rest that it was good, and the land that it was pleasant. Issachar will find blessing and enjoyment by living peacefully in his own land. Generally, he will not participate in major battles of conquest but will be satisfied with his portion. He bowed his shoulder to bear burdens like a donkey, as his tribe would engage in agriculture as a livelihood. And he became an indentured servant. Some explain that the Canaanites left in his inheritance would pay him a tax. 22
After addressing the sons of Leah, Jacob turns to the firstborn of Bilha, Rachel’s maidservant: Dan shall avenge his people , 23 as one of the tribes of Israel. His status will not be lower than the other tribes. 24 Jacob is emphasizing that the sons of his wives and the sons of the maidservants are equal in his eyes. Some explain that this prophetic blessing is referring not to the entire tribe but to the lone hero known from this tribe, Samson. 25
Dan shall be a serpent on the road, a viper on the path, that bites a horse’s heels and his rider falls backward. In this scenario, the horse cannot remain standing, and when it falls, the rider falls with it. This depiction of a biting snake alludes to Samson, who did not engage in a military war and was not the head of an army, but acted alone and killed his enemies in unusual ways. 26
For your salvation I await, Lord. When Jacob saw this terrifying snake in his vision that symbolized Dan, he turned to God and requested salvation from Him. Alternatively, following the explanation that the snake symbolizes Samson, Jacob perceived the suffering and tribulations that accompanied Samson’s heroic actions, and he therefore prayed for his salvation. 27
After the firstborn son of Bilha, Jacob addresses the firstborn of Zilpa, the maidservant of Leah: Gad, a troop, his troops, shall slash his enemies, and he shall slash their heel. ere and elsewhere, Gad is depicted as a tribe of warriors. 28
Jacob blesses Zilpa’s second son: From Asher, his bread is fat, and he shall provide royal delicacies. His fertile land will produce choice foods.
Jacob blesses Bilha’s second son, Naphtali: Naphtali is a doe let loose to run freely, who provides pleasant sayings, fine and praiseworthy statements. Alternatively, this means that from his inheritance good tidings will come. One who returns from the portion of Naphtali will say: I have seen beautiful flowers, good fruits, and the like. 29
The majority of descriptions in Jacob’s blessings involve animals, but in the case of Joseph, the son of Rachel, his father uses imagery of vegetation. Joseph is a fruitful tree , 30 a fruitful tree growing tranquilly alongside a spring, as his needs are provided for him; branches run over the wall. Some explain that this means: Girls shall stroll over the wall. 31 The tribe shall live in tranquility, so that instead of soldiers patrolling the wall, girls will stroll over it.
Jacob describes Joseph’s difficult experiences: They embittered him through their hatred and by selling him, and shot him, 32 and archers hated him.
However, Joseph did not respond in kind. Rather, his bow sat firm without moving, 33 and the arms of his hands were golden. His hands held the bow tightly, prepared to shoot if necessary. 34 All this ability comes to him by the hands of the Mighty One of Jacob , 35 from there, from the strength of the Shepherd of the stone of Israel. Israel is considered as strong as a stone. 36 Alternatively, this stone refers to God, in emphasis of His strength, similar to the more common expression “Rock of Israel.” 37
From the God of your father, and He shall help you, and the Almighty, and He shall bless you. Not only did God’s blessings save you in your most difficult times in the past, but they shall continue to shower you and your descendants with abundance and success: With blessings of heaven above, e.g., rain, and blessings of the depths lying beneath, as the land of your inheritance shall be fertile and moist, as well as blessings of fertility, of breasts and of womb.
The blessings of your father that I am bestowing upon you surpass the blessings of my parents to me, as I am blessing you with strength, courage, and constant support from Heaven, until the edge of the eternal hills, until the end of the world. 38 This is akin to saying: All of the days of the existence of the world. 39 They, these blessings, shall all be like a crown on the head of Joseph, placed on the head of the elect among his brothers, as their king. 40
Benjamin is a wolf that mauls; in the morning he devours prey, and in the evening he divides the spoils of the morning capture. Jacob blesses Benjamin, which is a tribe of warriors, with success in both earlier and later eras of Jewish history: The first king, Saul, came from Benjamin, while the delivery of the Jews from the evil Haman, toward the end of the biblical period, came about through Mordekhai, also a descendant of this tribe. 41
All these are the tribes of Israel, twelve, and this is that which their father spoke to them, and he blessed them; each man in accordance with his blessing he blessed them. This seems inaccurate, as apparently some of the sons did not receive any blessings but only rebuke. However, it stands to reason that Jacob also gave each of his sons a separate personal blessing, in the manner of a father prior to his death, and that is the blessing referred to in this verse. 42
He instructed them and said to them: I am about to die and be gathered to my people; bury me with my ancestors in the cave that is in the field of Efron the Hitite,
in the cave that is in the field of Makhpela, that is opposite Mamre in the land of Canaan, which Abraham had bought with the field from Efron the Hitite as a burial portion.
There they buried Abraham and Sarah, his wife; there they buried Isaac and Rebecca, his wife; and there I buried Leah. My father, mother, grandfather, and grandmother are all interred there, as well as my wife Leah. I wish to be buried there as well.
The purchase of the field and the cave that is in it, the familial burial plot, was acquired by my grandfather from the children of Het.
Jacob concluded instructing his sons. Although he was ill, he spoke while sitting up on the bed. When he sensed he was about to die, he drew his feet to the bed, and in this state he expired, and he was gathered to his people.
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 50
Steinsaltz Tanakh Commentaries | Torah | Steinsaltz on Genesis 50 somebodyJoseph, the most eminent of the brothers, fell upon his father’s face, wept upon him, and kissed him.
Joseph commanded his servants, the physicians, to embalm his father. Joseph had physicians under his jurisdiction who were responsible for embalming the dead, among other duties. This process involved removing the body’s inner organs and filling the body with preservatives, so that its physical form would be preserved. The physicians then embalmed Israel.
Forty days following his death were completed for him, as so are the days of embalming completed. This was the standard period necessary for this process, as preserving the form of the deceased is delicate work that takes an extensive amount of time. Egypt wept for him seventy days. The official mourning began only after Jacob’s body was embalmed and placed in a coffin. In accordance with Egyptian custom, the period of weeping lasted for seventy days. Alternatively, these seventy days include the forty days of embalming, while the remaining thirty days of weeping correspond to the standard Jewish custom of a thirty-day mourning period. 43
The days of his weeping passed, and Joseph spoke to Pharaoh’s household. Joseph did not approach Pharaoh directly, perhaps because he was worried that he might receive a negative response. Rather, he first sent messengers to Pharaoh’s household, saying: Please, if I have found favor in your eyes, please, speak in my name in the ears of Pharaoh, saying:
My father administered an oath to me, saying: Behold, I am dying; in my grave that I dug for me in the land of Canaan, bury me there. Joseph asks of Pharaoh: I will go up to the land of Canaan now and bury my father in the location he requested, and afterward I will return to you.
Pharaoh said: Go up and bury your father, in accordance with the oath he administered to you.
Joseph went up to bury his father, and all the servants of Pharaoh, the elders of his house, and all the elders of the land of Egypt went up with him,
and all of Joseph’s household, and his brothers, and his father’s household. They left only their children, their flocks, and their cattle in the land of Goshen.
He took up with him both chariots and horsemen, possibly sent by Pharaoh to ensure that Joseph would return to Egypt; and the camp was very substantial.
They came to the threshing floor of Atad, which might have been given this name because it was surrounded by thorny atad , or Lycium bushes. 44 That threshing floor is beyond the Jordan, located on their route to Canaan. It is possible that they preferred to travel by this longer path, past the eastern side of the Jordan River, rather than the shorter route, which traverses the land of the Philistines, in order to avoid powerful foreign nations, which might have perceived the large Egyptian convoy as a threat. And they eulogized a very great and substantial eulogy, and Joseph observed mourning for his father seven days.
The inhabitants of the land, the Canaanites, who were unaware of the reason for this great convoy, saw the mourning at the threshing floor of Atad, and they said: This is a substantial mourning [ evel ] for Egypt [ mitzrayim ]. Therefore, it was called, either the entire inhabited area or this specific location which subsequently became a city, Avel Mitzrayim, which is beyond the Jordan.
His, Jacob’s, sons did to him just as he had commanded them.
His sons conveyed him to the land of Canaan, and buried him in the cave of the field of Makhpela, which Abraham had bought with the field, as a burial portion, from Efron the Hitite, opposite Mamre.
Joseph returned to Egypt, he, and his brothers, and all who went up with him to bury his father, after he had buried his father.
Joseph’s brothers saw that their father had died, and they said: Perhaps 45 Joseph will hate us and will repay us for all the evil that we did to him.
They instructed messengers to tell Joseph, as they were too frightened to confront him directly, 46 saying: Your father instructed before his death, saying:
So say to Joseph: Please, forgive the transgression of your brothers and their sin, as they did evil to you. The brothers’ message continues: And now, please fulfill your father’s wishes and forgive the transgression of the servants of the God of your father. Whether Jacob indeed had issued such a request, or whether it was fabricated by the brothers, 47 they emphasize in his name that Joseph should forgive them, as they are all sons of one father who share a common faith. Joseph wept as they spoke to him.
Since Joseph did not respond to their request, the brothers were concerned that they had reminded him of the suffering they caused him all those years ago. Therefore, his brothers too went themselves and fell before him, Joseph, and they said: Behold, we are your slaves.
Joseph said to them: Fear not, for am I in place of God? Only God can grant atonement for your sin; I cannot punish you in His place.
You intended me harm; God intended it for good, in order to engender, as it is today, to bring about the outcome we see today, to keep many people alive. I do not bear any grudge against you, as it was due to your harmful intentions that I ascended to greatness, and it was ultimately because of your scheme that I became capable of sustaining you.
And now, fear not; I will sustain you and your children. He comforted them and spoke to their heart reassuring statements of this kind.
Joseph lived in Egypt, he and his father’s household; Joseph lived one hundred and ten years.
Joseph saw great-grandchildren from Ephraim; also the children of Makhir son of Manasseh were born at Joseph’s knees. Joseph was blessed with a relatively long life, and he lived to see great-grandchildren from both of his sons.
Before his death, Joseph said to his brothers: I am dying, and God will remember you and bring you up from this land to the land about which He took an oath to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob to give to them. I do not know when this will occur, but I am certain that God will take you out of this land.
Joseph administered an oath to the children of Israel, saying: God will remember you, and when that occurs you shall carry up my bones from there, Egypt.
Joseph died at the age of one hundred and ten years. They embalmed him, in accordance with the local custom, and he was placed in a coffin in Egypt.